Literature DB >> 29766345

Visual function assessed by visually evoked potentials in optic pathway low-grade gliomas with and without neurofibromatosis type 1.

Patrícia de Freitas Dotto1, Adriana Berezovsky1, Andrea Maria Cappellano2, Nasjla Saba da Silva2, Paula Yuri Sacai1, Frederico Adolfo B Silva2, Arthur Gustavo Fernandes1, Daniel Martins Rocha1, Solange Rios Salomão3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the contribution of full-field transient pattern-reversal visually evoked potentials (PRVEP) on cross-sectional evaluations of visual function in patients with and without neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) affected by optic pathway low-grade gliomas (OPLGG).
METHODS: Participants were children and adolescents referred for visual function evaluation and receiving treatment for OPLGG, linked (NF1-OPLGG) or not to NF1 (Non-NF1-OPLGG). An age-adjusted control group was included for comparison. Monocular full-field PRVEPs were recorded from each eye in accordance with ISCEV standards. Parameters of peak-to-peak P100 amplitude (µV) and P100 peak time (ms) were measured. Cutoff normative values obtained from controls for 15' and 60' check sizes were ≥ 9.0 µV for N75-P100 amplitude and ≤ 103.0 ms for P100 peak time. The association of age, gender, tumor resection and NF1 with P100 amplitude reduction and P100 peak time delay was explored by Firth logistic regression modeling.
RESULTS: Participants were 30 patients (15 males, 60% Non-NF1) with ages from 3.6 to 19.9 years (mean ± SD = 9.2 ± 3.8 years; median = 8.4 years) and 19 controls (12 males) with ages from 3.7 to 19.9 years (mean ± SD = 10.4 ± 4.9 years; median = 9.5 years). Overall, 68% of tested eyes presented reduced P100 amplitudes for both check sizes (46% in the NF-1 and 83% in the Non-NF1) and delayed P100 for both check sizes (38% in NF1 and 89% in Non-NF1). Absence of NF1 adjusted for age, gender and tumor resection was significantly associated with marginally reduced P100 amplitude for 15' checks [odds ratio (OR): 6.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.96-40.94; p = 0.055].
CONCLUSIONS: Full-field PRVEP on cross-sectional evaluations contributed to detect visual dysfunction in two-thirds of patients with OPLGG by highlighting subclinical evidence of visual loss. Abnormalities were more frequent and more severe in OPLGG not linked to NF1 than in NF1-OPLGG; however, there was a difference in surgical management between these groups. PRVEP parameters may provide reliable evidence of visual pathway involvement in OPLGG, helping to hasten treatment before optic atrophy is detected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Childhood; Optic pathway glioma; Pattern reversal; Visual pathways; Visually evoked potentials

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29766345     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-018-9635-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  63 in total

1.  Visual evoked potential abnormalities in chiasmal lesions.

Authors:  J Brecelj; M Denislic; M Skrbec
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sheryl Nehamkin; Michael Windom; Tanvir U Syed
Journal:  Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol       Date:  2008-12

3.  Can screening for optic nerve gliomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type I be performed with visual-evoked potential testing?

Authors:  Darcy H Wolsey; Scott A Larson; Donnel Creel; Robert Hoffman
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials: (2016 update).

Authors:  J Vernon Odom; Michael Bach; Mitchell Brigell; Graham E Holder; Daphne L McCulloch; Atsushi Mizota; Alma Patrizia Tormene
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 5.  The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.

Authors:  David N Louis; Arie Perry; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Webster K Cavenee; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Paul Kleihues; David W Ellison
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 17.088

6.  Electrophysiological findings in neurofibromatosis type 1.

Authors:  Deniz Yerdelen; Filiz Koc; Murat Durdu; Mehmet Karakas
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-04-17       Impact factor: 3.181

Review 7.  Low Grade Gliomas in Children.

Authors:  Alan Chalil; Vijay Ramaswamy
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.987

8.  Optic pathway/hypothalamic gliomas: a dilemma in management.

Authors:  H J Hoffman; R P Humphreys; J M Drake; J T Rutka; L E Becker; D Jenkin; M Greenberg
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.162

Review 9.  Visual electrophysiology in the clinical evaluation of optic neuritis, chiasmal tumours, achiasmia, and ocular albinism: an overview.

Authors:  Jelka Brecelj
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 10.  The Changing Landscape of Pediatric Low-Grade Gliomas: Clinical Challenges and Emerging Therapies.

Authors:  Ana S Guerreiro Stucklin; Uri Tabori; Michael A Grotzer
Journal:  Neuropediatrics       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 1.947

View more
  3 in total

1.  Central and peripheral steady-state visual evoked potentials in children with optic pathway gliomas.

Authors:  Sarah Zakaib Rassi; Luis H Ospina; Ariane Bochereau; Yvan Samson; Sébastien Perreault; Dave Saint-Amour
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 2.  Clinical electrophysiology of the optic nerve and retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Oliver R Marmoy; Suresh Viswanathan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  What can visual electrophysiology tell about possible visual-field defects in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Siân E Handley; Maja Šuštar; Manca Tekavčič Pompe
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.775

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.