Literature DB >> 29054879

Domain Specificity of Oculomotor Learning after Changes in Sensory Processing.

Yuliy Tsank1, Miguel P Eckstein2.   

Abstract

Humans visually process the world with varying spatial resolution and can program their eye movements optimally to maximize information acquisition for a variety of everyday tasks. Diseases such as macular degeneration can change visual sensory processing, introducing central vision loss (a scotoma). However, humans can learn to direct a new preferred retinal location to regions of interest for simple visual tasks. Whether such learned compensatory saccades are optimal and generalize to more complex tasks, which require integrating information across a large area of the visual field, is not well understood. Here, we explore the possible effects of central vision loss on the optimal saccades during a face identification task, using a gaze-contingent simulated scotoma. We show that a new foveated ideal observer with a central scotoma correctly predicts that the human optimal point of fixation to identify faces shifts from just below the eyes to one that is at the tip of the nose and another at the top of the forehead. However, even after 5000 trials, humans of both sexes surprisingly do not change their initial fixations to adapt to the new optimal fixation points to faces. In contrast, saccades do change for tasks such as object following and to a lesser extent during search. Our findings argue against a central brain motor-compensatory mechanism that generalizes across tasks. They instead suggest task specificity in the learning of oculomotor plans in response to changes in front-end sensory processing and the possibility of separate domain-specific representations of learned oculomotor plans in the brain.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The mechanism by which humans adapt eye movements in response to central vision loss is still not well understood and carries importance for gaining a fundamental understanding of brain plasticity. We show that although humans adapt their eye movements for simpler tasks such as object following and search, these adaptations do not generalize to more complex tasks such as face identification. We provide the first computational model to predict where humans with central vision loss should direct their eye movements in face identification tasks, which could become a critical tool in making patient-specific recommendations. Based on these results, we suggest a novel theory for oculomotor learning: a distributed representation of learned eye-movement plans represented in domain-specific areas of the brain.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/3711469-16$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  foveation; optimality; saccades; scotoma

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29054879      PMCID: PMC5700427          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1208-17.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  37 in total

1.  Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information.

Authors:  Philippe G Schyns; Lizann Bonnar; Frédéric Gosselin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-09

2.  Evaluation of a new quantitative technique to assess the number and extent of preferred retinal loci in macular disease.

Authors:  M D Crossland; M Sims; R F Galbraith; G S Rubin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Choice of saccade endpoint under risk.

Authors:  John F Ackermann; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Transmitting and decoding facial expressions.

Authors:  Marie L Smith; Garrison W Cottrell; Frédéric Gosselin; Philippe G Schyns
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-03

5.  Faces in the eye of the beholder: unique and stable eye scanning patterns of individual observers.

Authors:  Eyal Mehoudar; Joseph Arizpe; Chris I Baker; Galit Yovel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination.

Authors:  A E Burgess; R F Wagner; R J Jennings; H B Barlow
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Visual search under scotopic lighting conditions.

Authors:  Vivian C Paulun; Alexander C Schütz; Melchi M Michel; Wilson S Geisler; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Looking just below the eyes is optimal across face recognition tasks.

Authors:  Matthew F Peterson; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Two fixations suffice in face recognition.

Authors:  Janet Hui-wen Hsiao; Garrison Cottrell
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-10

10.  Perception and Processing of Faces in the Human Brain Is Tuned to Typical Feature Locations.

Authors:  Benjamin de Haas; D Samuel Schwarzkopf; Ivan Alvarez; Rebecca P Lawson; Linda Henriksson; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  3 in total

1.  Introduction to Special Issue on Perceptual Learning.

Authors:  Miguel P Eckstein; Cong Yu; Dov Sagi; Marisa Carrasco; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Eye Movements in Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Preeti Verghese; Cécile Vullings; Natela Shanidze
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 7.745

3.  Initial eye gaze to faces and its functional consequence on face identification abilities in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Kimberly B Schauder; Woon Ju Park; Yuliy Tsank; Miguel P Eckstein; Duje Tadin; Loisa Bennetto
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2019-12-28       Impact factor: 4.025

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.