Literature DB >> 15772663

Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search.

Jiri Najemnik1, Wilson S Geisler.   

Abstract

To perform visual search, humans, like many mammals, encode a large field of view with retinas having variable spatial resolution, and then use high-speed eye movements to direct the highest-resolution region, the fovea, towards potential target locations. Good search performance is essential for survival, and hence mammals may have evolved efficient strategies for selecting fixation locations. Here we address two questions: what are the optimal eye movement strategies for a foveated visual system faced with the problem of finding a target in a cluttered environment, and do humans employ optimal eye movement strategies during a search? We derive the ideal bayesian observer for search tasks in which a target is embedded at an unknown location within a random background that has the spectral characteristics of natural scenes. Our ideal searcher uses precise knowledge about the statistics of the scenes in which the target is embedded, and about its own visual system, to make eye movements that gain the most information about target location. We find that humans achieve nearly optimal search performance, even though humans integrate information poorly across fixations. Analysis of the ideal searcher reveals that there is little benefit from perfect integration across fixations--much more important is efficient processing of information on each fixation. Apparently, evolution has exploited this fact to achieve efficient eye movement strategies with minimal neural resources devoted to memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15772663     DOI: 10.1038/nature03390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  187 in total

Review 1.  Contributions of ideal observer theory to vision research.

Authors:  Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Dynamic integration of information about salience and value for saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Alexander C Schütz; Julia Trommershäuser; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A probabilistic model of eye movements in concept formation.

Authors:  Jonathan D Nelson; Garrison W Cottrell
Journal:  Neurocomputing       Date:  2007-01-02       Impact factor: 5.719

4.  Looking versus seeing: Strategies alter eye movements during visual search.

Authors:  Marcus R Watson; Allison A Brennan; Alan Kingstone; James T Enns
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

5.  Initial eye movements during face identification are optimal and similar across cultures.

Authors:  Charles C-F Or; Matthew F Peterson; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Choice of saccade endpoint under risk.

Authors:  John F Ackermann; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Psychometric functions of uncertain template matching observers.

Authors:  Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Visual memory during pauses between successive saccades.

Authors:  Timothy M Gersch; Eileen Kowler; Brian S Schnitzer; Barbara A Dosher
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The role of peripheral vision in saccade planning: learning from people with tunnel vision.

Authors:  Gang Luo; Fernando Vargas-Martin; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Of bits and wows: A Bayesian theory of surprise with applications to attention.

Authors:  Pierre Baldi; Laurent Itti
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2009-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.