Literature DB >> 21770989

Microbial contamination of fuel ethanol fermentations.

M Beckner1, M L Ivey, T G Phister.   

Abstract

Microbial contamination is a pervasive problem in any ethanol fermentation system. These infections can at minimum affect the efficiency of the fermentation and at their worse lead to stuck fermentations causing plants to shut down for cleaning before beginning anew. These delays can result in costly loss of time as well as lead to an increased cost of the final product. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are the most common bacterial contaminants found in ethanol production facilities and have been linked to decreased ethanol production during fermentation. Lactobacillus sp. generally predominant as these bacteria are well adapted for survival under high ethanol, low pH and low oxygen conditions found during fermentation. It has been generally accepted that lactobacilli cause inhibition of Saccharomyces sp. and limit ethanol production through two basic methods; either production of lactic and acetic acids or through competition for nutrients. However, a number of researchers have demonstrated that these mechanisms may not completely account for the amount of loss observed and have suggested other means by which bacteria can inhibit yeast growth and ethanol production. While LAB are the primary contaminates of concern in industrial ethanol fermentations, wild yeast may also affect the productivity of these fermentations. Though many yeast species have the ability to thrive in a fermentation environment, Dekkera bruxellensis has been repeatedly targeted and cited as one of the main contaminant yeasts in ethanol production. Though widely studied for its detrimental effects on wine, the specific species-species interactions between D. bruxellensis and S. cerevisiae are still poorly understood.
© 2011 The Authors. Letters in Applied Microbiology © 2011 The Society for Applied Microbiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21770989     DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2011.03124.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0266-8254            Impact factor:   2.858


  30 in total

1.  Use of non-conventional yeast improves the wine aroma profile of Ribolla Gialla.

Authors:  Sofia Dashko; Nerve Zhou; Tinkara Tinta; Paolo Sivilotti; Melita Sternad Lemut; Kajetan Trost; Amparo Gamero; Teun Boekhout; Lorena Butinar; Urska Vrhovsek; Jure Piskur
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Microbial diversity in sugarcane ethanol production in a Brazilian distillery using a culture-independent method.

Authors:  Ohana Yonara Assis Costa; Betulia Morais Souto; Daiva Domenech Tupinambá; Jessica Carvalho Bergmann; Cynthia Maria Kyaw; Ricardo Henrique Kruger; Cristine Chaves Barreto; Betania Ferraz Quirino
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Analysis for low-molecular-weight carbohydrates is needed to account for all energy-contributing nutrients in some feed ingredients, but physical characteristics do not predict in vitro digestibility of dry matter.

Authors:  D M D L Navarro; E M A M Bruininx; L de Jong; H H Stein
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Characterization of microbial communities in ethanol biorefineries.

Authors:  Fernanda C Firmino; Davide Porcellato; Madison Cox; Garret Suen; Jeffery R Broadbent; James L Steele
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 5.  Conventional and nonconventional strategies for controlling bacterial contamination in fuel ethanol fermentations.

Authors:  Sandra Regina Ceccato-Antonini
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Lactococcus lactis metabolism and gene expression during growth on plant tissues.

Authors:  Benjamin L Golomb; Maria L Marco
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Biotechnological potential of yeast isolates from cachaça: the Brazilian spirit.

Authors:  Luís Eduardo Fernandes Rodrigues da Conceição; Margarete Alice Fontes Saraiva; Raphael Hermano Santos Diniz; Juliana Oliveira; Gustavo Dimas Barbosa; Florencia Alvarez; Lygia Fátima da Mata Correa; Hygor Mezadri; Mauricio Xavier Coutrim; Robson José de Cássia Franco Afonso; Candida Lucas; Ieso Miranda Castro; Rogelio Lopes Brandão
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  Bacterial Community Structure and Dynamics During Corn-Based Bioethanol Fermentation.

Authors:  Qing Li; E Patrick Heist; Luke A Moe
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Bioprocessing of shrimp wastes to obtain chitosan and its antimicrobial potential in the context of ethanolic fermentation against bacterial contamination.

Authors:  Isabella C Tanganini; Ligianne D Shirahigue; Mariana Altenhofen da Silva; Kelly R Francisco; Sandra R Ceccato-Antonini
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 10.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for second-generation ethanol production: from academic exploration to industrial implementation.

Authors:  Mickel L A Jansen; Jasmine M Bracher; Ioannis Papapetridis; Maarten D Verhoeven; Hans de Bruijn; Paul P de Waal; Antonius J A van Maris; Paul Klaassen; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.