Literature DB >> 26380183

Improving lung cancer outcomes by improving the quality of surgical care.

Raymond U Osarogiagbon1, Thomas A D'Amico1.   

Abstract

Surgical resection remains the most important curative treatment modality for non-small cell lung cancer, but variations in short- and long-term surgical outcomes jeopardize the benefit of surgery for certain patients, operated on by certain types of surgeons, at certain types of institutions. We discuss current understanding of surgical quality measures, and their role in promoting understanding of the causes of outcome disparities after lung cancer surgery. We also discuss the use of minimally invasive surgical resection approaches to expand the playing field for surgery in lung cancer care, and end with a discussion of the future role of surgery in a world of alternative treatment possibilities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Quality improvement; comparative effectiveness; outcomes of care; surgical resection; survival

Year:  2015        PMID: 26380183      PMCID: PMC4549482          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2015.08.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res        ISSN: 2218-6751


  87 in total

1.  Anatomic segmentectomy in the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Matthew J Schuchert; Brian L Pettiford; Samuel Keeley; Thomas A D'Amato; Arman Kilic; John Close; Arjun Pennathur; Ricardo Santos; Hiran C Fernando; James R Landreneau; James D Luketich; Rodney J Landreneau
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  A meta-analysis of unmatched and matched patients comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and conventional open lobectomy.

Authors:  Christopher Cao; Con Manganas; Su C Ang; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

3.  Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS database.

Authors:  Subroto Paul; Nasser K Altorki; Shubin Sheng; Paul C Lee; David H Harpole; Mark W Onaitis; Brendon M Stiles; Jeffrey L Port; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Patterns of surgical care of lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Alex G Little; Valerie W Rusch; James A Bonner; Laurie E Gaspar; Mark R Green; W Richard Webb; Andrew K Stewart
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Mediastinal lymph node examination and survival in resected early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Xinhua Yu
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer.

Authors:  P B Bach; L D Cramer; D Schrag; R J Downey; S E Gelfand; C B Begg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Impact of adjuvant treatment for microscopic residual disease after non-small cell lung cancer surgery.

Authors:  Jacquelyn G Hancock; Joshua E Rosen; Alberto Antonicelli; Amy Moreno; Anthony W Kim; Frank C Detterbeck; Daniel J Boffa
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus lobectomy for operable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomised trials.

Authors:  Joe Y Chang; Suresh Senan; Marinus A Paul; Reza J Mehran; Alexander V Louie; Peter Balter; Harry J M Groen; Stephen E McRae; Joachim Widder; Lei Feng; Ben E E M van den Borne; Mark F Munsell; Coen Hurkmans; Donald A Berry; Erik van Werkhoven; John J Kresl; Anne-Marie Dingemans; Omar Dawood; Cornelis J A Haasbeek; Larry S Carpenter; Katrien De Jaeger; Ritsuko Komaki; Ben J Slotman; Egbert F Smit; Jack A Roth
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Prognostic assessment after surgical resection for non-small cell lung cancer: experiences in 2083 patients.

Authors:  Joachim Pfannschmidt; Thomas Muley; Heinrich Bülzebruck; Hans Hoffmann; Hendrik Dienemann
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 5.705

10.  A randomized trial of systematic nodal dissection in resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yi long Wu; Zhi-fan Huang; Si-yu Wang; Xue-ning Yang; Wei Ou
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.705

View more
  9 in total

1.  One, two, three or four ports… does it matter? Priorities in lung cancer surgery.

Authors:  Herbert Decaluwé
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Patients reported outcomes in thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Cecilia Pompili; Kate Absolom; Galina Velikova; Leah Backhus
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  ERAS in VATS-do we really need to follow the trend?

Authors:  Hussein Elkhayat; Diego Gonzalez-Rivas
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12

4.  Utility of the surgical Apgar score for predicting the short- and long-term outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients who undergo surgery.

Authors:  Akihiro Nagoya; Ryu Kanzaki; Kenji Kimura; Eriko Fukui; Takashi Kanou; Naoko Ose; Soichiro Funaki; Masato Minami; Makoto Fujii; Yasushi Shintani
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-07-09

Review 5.  Technical Standards for Cancer Surgery: Commission on Cancer Standards 5.3-5.8.

Authors:  Matthew H G Katz; Amanda B Francescatti; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 4.339

6.  Volume-Based Care Regionalization: Pitfalls and Challenges.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 50.717

7.  The pilot project of the National Cancer Network in Poland: Assessment of the functioning of the National Cancer Network and results from quality indicators for lung cancer (2019-2021).

Authors:  Łukasz Trembecki; Aleksandra Sztuder; Izabella Dębicka; Rafał Matkowski; Adam Maciejczyk
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Institutional-Level Differences in Quality and Outcomes of Lung Cancer Resections in the United States.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Helmneh M Sineshaw; Chun Chieh Lin; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Positive Surgical Margins in the 10 Most Common Solid Cancers.

Authors:  Ryan K Orosco; Viridiana J Tapia; Joseph A Califano; Bryan Clary; Ezra E W Cohen; Christopher Kane; Scott M Lippman; Karen Messer; Alfredo Molinolo; James D Murphy; John Pang; Assuntina Sacco; Kathryn R Tringale; Anne Wallace; Quyen T Nguyen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.