Literature DB >> 35187620

Technical Standards for Cancer Surgery: Commission on Cancer Standards 5.3-5.8.

Matthew H G Katz1, Amanda B Francescatti2, Kelly K Hunt3.   

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines in oncology have typically focused on workup, disease staging, and medical management. Although recommendations for surgical care have been included in these guidelines, those recommendations have primarily addressed issues such as the role of surgery or the incorporation of surgery into multidisciplinary treatment strategies, not the technical performance of the operative procedures themselves. Therefore, the quality of surgery, the only component of multidisciplinary cancer care proven to be potentially curative, has been poorly controlled. During the past decade, the American College of Surgeons (ACS) cancer programs have attempted to fill this gap by developing "operative standards" for cancer surgery. This report discusses the history of the operative standards, highlights evidence to demonstrate their efficacy, and describes the activities of the ACS Commission on Cancer and Cancer Surgery Standards Program toward disseminating and implementing them.
© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35187620     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11375-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   4.339


  4 in total

1.  Improving lung cancer outcomes by improving the quality of surgical care.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

2.  Adherence to surgical and oncologic standards improves survival in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Beiqun Zhao; Catherine Tsai; Kelly K Hunt; Sarah L Blair
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Erratum to: A Novel Treatment Schedule for Rapid Completion of Surgery and Radiation in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Tina J Hieken; Robert W Mutter; James W Jakub; Judy C Boughey; Amy C Degnim; William R Sukov; Stephanie Childs; Kimberly S Corbin; Keith M Furutani; Thomas J Whitaker; Sean S Park
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Long-term results of a prospective surgical trial comparing 2 cm vs. 4 cm excision margins for 740 patients with 1-4 mm melanomas.

Authors:  C M Balch; S J Soong; T Smith; M I Ross; M M Urist; C P Karakousis; W J Temple; M C Mihm; R L Barnhill; W R Jewell; H J Wanebo; R Desmond
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.344

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.