Julio Garcia1, Alex J Barker1, Ian Murphy1, Kelly Jarvis2, Susanne Schnell1, Jeremy D Collins1, James C Carr1, S Chris Malaisrie3, Michael Markl4. 1. Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, 737 N Michigan, Suite 1600, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, 737 N Michigan, Suite 1600, Chicago, IL 60611, USA Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. 3. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, 737 N Michigan, Suite 1600, Chicago, IL 60611, USA Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA mmarkl@northwestern.edu.
Abstract
AIMS: Four-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was employed for the simultaneous assessment of morphometry and flow parameters along the thoracic aorta to investigate associations between flow, age, aorta diameter, and aortic valve morphology. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-five subjects, 65 controls, 50 patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), and 50 patients with a dilated aorta, and a tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) underwent 4D flow MRI. Following 3D segmentation of the aorta, a vessel centreline was calculated and used to extract aorta diameter, peak systolic velocity, and normalized systolic flow displacement. Validation of 4D flow MRI-based morphometric measurements compared with manual diameter measurements from standard contrast-enhanced MR angiography in 20 controls showed good agreement (mean difference = 0.4 mm, limits of agreement = ±1.31 mm) except at the sinus of valsalva. BAV showed significant differences in average peak velocity (PV; P < 0.016) compared with TAV and controls between the left ventricle outflow tract to sino-tubular junction (BAV: 1.3 ± 0.3 m/s; TAV: 1.2 ± 0.2 m/s; controls: 1.0 ± 0.1 m/s) and the ascending aorta for average normalized flow displacement (BAV: 0.11 ± 0.02; TAV: 0.09 ± 0.02; controls: 0.06 ± 0.01, P < 0.016) despite similar average aortic dimensions for BAV (37 ± 1 mm) and TAV (39 ± 1 mm). Multivariate linear regression showed a significant correlation of maximal aortic diameter to age, PV, and normalized flow displacement (R(2) = 0.413, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A single acquisition of 4D flow MRI characterized local morphological and haemodynamic differences between groups along the aorta. BAV showed altered haemodynamics when compared with TAV in spite of having similar aorta dimensions. Maximal aorta diameter was associated with age, PV, and normalized flow displacement. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: Four-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was employed for the simultaneous assessment of morphometry and flow parameters along the thoracic aorta to investigate associations between flow, age, aorta diameter, and aortic valve morphology. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-five subjects, 65 controls, 50 patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), and 50 patients with a dilated aorta, and a tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) underwent 4D flow MRI. Following 3D segmentation of the aorta, a vessel centreline was calculated and used to extract aorta diameter, peak systolic velocity, and normalized systolic flow displacement. Validation of 4D flow MRI-based morphometric measurements compared with manual diameter measurements from standard contrast-enhanced MR angiography in 20 controls showed good agreement (mean difference = 0.4 mm, limits of agreement = ±1.31 mm) except at the sinus of valsalva. BAV showed significant differences in average peak velocity (PV; P < 0.016) compared with TAV and controls between the left ventricle outflow tract to sino-tubular junction (BAV: 1.3 ± 0.3 m/s; TAV: 1.2 ± 0.2 m/s; controls: 1.0 ± 0.1 m/s) and the ascending aorta for average normalized flow displacement (BAV: 0.11 ± 0.02; TAV: 0.09 ± 0.02; controls: 0.06 ± 0.01, P < 0.016) despite similar average aortic dimensions for BAV (37 ± 1 mm) and TAV (39 ± 1 mm). Multivariate linear regression showed a significant correlation of maximal aortic diameter to age, PV, and normalized flow displacement (R(2) = 0.413, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A single acquisition of 4D flow MRI characterized local morphological and haemodynamic differences between groups along the aorta. BAV showed altered haemodynamics when compared with TAV in spite of having similar aorta dimensions. Maximal aorta diameter was associated with age, PV, and normalized flow displacement. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Jelena Bock; Alex Frydrychowicz; Aurélien F Stalder; Thorsten A Bley; Hans Burkhardt; Jürgen Hennig; Michael Markl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Christian Meierhofer; Eike Philipp Schneider; Christine Lyko; Andrea Hutter; Stefan Martinoff; Michael Markl; Alfred Hager; John Hess; Heiko Stern; Sohrab Fratz Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-12-09 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Raimund Erbel; Victor Aboyans; Catherine Boileau; Eduardo Bossone; Roberto Di Bartolomeo; Holger Eggebrecht; Arturo Evangelista; Volkmar Falk; Herbert Frank; Oliver Gaemperli; Martin Grabenwöger; Axel Haverich; Bernard Iung; Athanasios John Manolis; Folkert Meijboom; Christoph A Nienaber; Marco Roffi; Hervé Rousseau; Udo Sechtem; Per Anton Sirnes; Regula S von Allmen; Christiaan J M Vrints Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2014-08-29 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Julio Garcia; Michael Markl; Susanne Schnell; Bradley Allen; Pegah Entezari; Riti Mahadevia; S Chris Malaisrie; Philippe Pibarot; James Carr; Alex J Barker Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Subodh Verma; Bobby Yanagawa; Sameer Kalra; Marc Ruel; Mark D Peterson; Michael H Yamashita; Andrew Fagan; Maria E Currie; Christopher W White; Stephane Leung Wai Sang; Cristian Rosu; Steve Singh; Holly Mewhort; Nandini Gupta; Paul W M Fedak Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2013-08-26 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Julio Garcia; Oscar R Marrufo; Alfredo O Rodriguez; Eric Larose; Philippe Pibarot; Lyes Kadem Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2012-04-06 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Michael B Scott; Hyungkyu Huh; Pim van Ooij; Vincent Chen; Brenda Herrera; Mohammed Elbaz; Patrick McCarthy; S Chris Malaisrie; James Carr; Paul W M Fedak; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-03-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Julio Garcia; Roel L F van der Palen; Emilie Bollache; Kelly Jarvis; Michael J Rose; Alex J Barker; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Joshua Robinson; Cynthia K Rigsby; Michael Markl Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-05-26 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Hector I Michelena; Alessandro Della Corte; Arturo Evangelista; Joseph J Maleszewski; William D Edwards; Mary J Roman; Richard B Devereux; Borja Fernández; Federico M Asch; Alex J Barker; Lilia M Sierra-Galan; Laurent De Kerchove; Susan M Fernandes; Paul W M Fedak; Evaldas Girdauskas; Victoria Delgado; Suhny Abbara; Emmanuel Lansac; Siddharth K Prakash; Malenka M Bissell; Bogdan A Popescu; Michael D Hope; Marta Sitges; Vinod H Thourani; Phillippe Pibarot; Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran; Patrizio Lancellotti; Michael A Borger; John K Forrest; John Webb; Dianna M Milewicz; Raj Makkaar; Martin B Leon; Stephen P Sanders; Michael Markl; Victor A Ferrari; William C Roberts; Jae-Kwan Song; Philipp Blanke; Charles S White; Samuel Siu; Lars G Svensson; Alan C Braverman; Joseph Bavaria; Thoralf M Sundt; Gebrine El Khoury; Ruggero De Paulis; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Jeroen J Bax; Catherine M Otto; Hans-Joachim Schäfers Journal: Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging Date: 2021-07-22
Authors: Ozair Rahman; Michael Markl; Pallavi Balte; Haben Berhane; Carmen Blanken; Kenichiro Suwa; Stephen Dashnaw; Oliver Wieben; David A Bluemke; Martin R Prince; Joao Lima; Erin Michos; Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Eric A Hoffman; Antoinette S Gomes; Karol Watson; Yanping Sun; James Carr; R Graham Barr Journal: Radiology Date: 2019-07-23 Impact factor: 29.146