Literature DB >> 26376884

Comparison of radiographic joint space width and magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of knee replacement: A longitudinal case-control study from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Felix Eckstein1, Robert Boudreau2, Zhijie Wang3, Michael J Hannon3, Jeff Duryea4, Wolfgang Wirth5, Sebastian Cotofana5, Ali Guermazi6, Frank Roemer6,7, Michael Nevitt8, Markus R John9, Christoph Ladel10, Leena Sharma11, David J Hunter12, C Kent Kwoh13.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether change in fixed-location measures of radiographic joint space width (JSW) and cartilage thickness by MRI predict knee replacement.
METHODS: Knees replaced between 36 and 60 months' follow-up in the Osteoarthritis Initiative were each matched with one control by age, sex and radiographic status. Radiographic JSW was determined from fixed flexion radiographs and subregional femorotibial cartilage thickness from 3 T MRI. Changes between the annual visit before replacement (T0) and 2 years before T0 (T-2) were compared using conditional logistic regression.
RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen knees from 102 participants (55.5 % women; age 64.2 ± 8.7 [mean ± SD] years) were studied. Fixed-location JSW change at 22.5 % from medial to lateral differed more between replaced and control knees (case-control [cc] OR = 1.57; 95 % CI: 1.23-2.01) than minimum medial JSW change (ccOR = 1.38; 95 % CI: 1.11-1.71). Medial femorotibial cartilage loss displayed discrimination similar to minimum JSW, and central tibial cartilage loss similar to fixed-location JSW. Location-independent thinning and thickening scores were elevated prior to knee replacement.
CONCLUSIONS: Discrimination of structural progression between knee pre-placement cases versus controls was stronger for fixed-location than minimum radiographic JSW. MRI displayed similar discrimination to radiography and suggested greater simultaneous cartilage thickening and loss prior to knee replacement. KEY POINTS: • Fixed-location JSW predicts surgical knee replacement more strongly than minimum JSW. • MRI predicts knee replacement with similar accuracy to radiographic JSW. • MRI reveals greater cartilage thinning and thickening prior to knee replacement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical validation; Knee osteoarthritis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Measurement performance; Radiographic joint space width (JSW)

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26376884      PMCID: PMC4794411          DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3977-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  28 in total

1.  Three year joint space narrowing predicts long term incidence of knee surgery in patients with osteoarthritis: an eight year prospective follow up study.

Authors:  O Bruyere; F Richy; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Five-year followup of knee joint cartilage thickness changes after acute rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  F Eckstein; W Wirth; L S Lohmander; M I Hudelmaier; R B Frobell
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 10.995

3.  Comparison of conventional standing knee radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging in assessing progression of tibiofemoral joint osteoarthritis.

Authors:  F Cicuttini; J Hankin; G Jones; A Wluka
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 4.  What is the predictive value of MRI for the occurrence of knee replacement surgery in knee osteoarthritis?

Authors:  J-P Pelletier; C Cooper; C Peterfy; J-Y Reginster; M-L Brandi; O Bruyère; R Chapurlat; F Cicuttini; P G Conaghan; M Doherty; H Genant; G Giacovelli; M C Hochberg; D J Hunter; J A Kanis; M Kloppenburg; J-D Laredo; T McAlindon; M Nevitt; J-P Raynauld; R Rizzoli; C Zilkens; F W Roemer; J Martel-Pelletier; A Guermazi
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Can structural joint damage measured with MR imaging be used to predict knee replacement in the following year?

Authors:  Frank W Roemer; C Kent Kwoh; Michael J Hannon; David J Hunter; Felix Eckstein; Zhijie Wang; Robert M Boudreau; Markus R John; Michael C Nevitt; Ali Guermazi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Imaging of cartilage and bone: promises and pitfalls in clinical trials of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  F Eckstein; A Guermazi; G Gold; J Duryea; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; W Wirth; C G Miller
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 7.  The role of imaging in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Frank W Roemer; Felix Eckstein; Daichi Hayashi; Ali Guermazi
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.098

8.  Trajectory of cartilage loss within 4 years of knee replacement--a nested case-control study from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  F Eckstein; R M Boudreau; Z Wang; M J Hannon; W Wirth; S Cotofana; A Guermazi; F Roemer; M Nevitt; M R John; C Ladel; L Sharma; D J Hunter; C K Kwoh
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Rate of cartilage loss at two years predicts subsequent total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study.

Authors:  F M Cicuttini; G Jones; A Forbes; A E Wluka
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Risk factors associated with the loss of cartilage volume on weight-bearing areas in knee osteoarthritis patients assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Pelletier; Jean-Pierre Raynauld; Marie-Josée Berthiaume; François Abram; Denis Choquette; Boulos Haraoui; John F Beary; Gary A Cline; Joan M Meyer; Johanne Martel-Pelletier
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  13 in total

1.  The contribution of 3D quantitative meniscal and cartilage measures to variation in normal radiographic joint space width-Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative healthy reference cohort.

Authors:  Melanie Roth; Wolfgang Wirth; Katja Emmanuel; Adam G Culvenor; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Changes in the structural features of osteoarthritis in a year of weight loss.

Authors:  S R Jafarzadeh; M Clancy; J-S Li; C M Apovian; A Guermazi; F Eckstein; D T Felson
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 3.  Imaging of osteoarthritis-recent research developments and future perspective.

Authors:  Daichi Hayashi; Frank W Roemer; Ali Guermazi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Evaluation of Chondrocalcinosis and Associated Knee Joint Degeneration Using MR Imaging: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Alexandra S Gersing; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Ursula Heilmeier; Gabby B Joseph; Luca Facchetti; Martin Kretzschmar; John A Lynch; Charles E McCulloch; Michael C Nevitt; Lynne S Steinbach; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Effect of Intra-Articular Sprifermin vs Placebo on Femorotibial Joint Cartilage Thickness in Patients With Osteoarthritis: The FORWARD Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Marc C Hochberg; Ali Guermazi; Hans Guehring; Aida Aydemir; Stephen Wax; Patricia Fleuranceau-Morel; Asger Reinstrup Bihlet; Inger Byrjalsen; Jeppe Ragnar Andersen; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Subregional laminar cartilage MR spin-spin relaxation times (T2) in osteoarthritic knees with and without medial femorotibial cartilage loss - data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI).

Authors:  W Wirth; S Maschek; P Beringer; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Fully Automatic Knee Joint Segmentation and Quantitative Analysis for Osteoarthritis from Magnetic Resonance (MR) Images Using a Deep Learning Model.

Authors:  Xiongfeng Tang; Deming Guo; Aie Liu; Dijia Wu; Jianhua Liu; Nannan Xu; Yanguo Qin
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-06-14

8.  Sensitivity to change and association of three-dimensional meniscal measures with radiographic joint space width loss in rapid clinical progression of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Melanie Roth; Katja Emmanuel; Wolfgang Wirth; C Kent Kwoh; David J Hunter; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Differences in tibial subchondral bone structure evaluated using plain radiographs between knees with and without cartilage damage or bone marrow lesions - the Oulu Knee Osteoarthritis study.

Authors:  Jukka Hirvasniemi; Jérôme Thevenot; Ali Guermazi; Jana Podlipská; Frank W Roemer; Miika T Nieminen; Simo Saarakkala
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Comparison of 2 Radiographic Techniques for Measurement of Tibiofemoral Joint Space Width.

Authors:  Nabil Mehta; Jeffrey Duryea; Gary J Badger; Matthew R Akelman; Morgan H Jones; Kurt P Spindler; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-09-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.