OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ability of different MRI sequences to detect chondrocalcinosis within knee cartilage and menisci, and to analyze the association with joint degeneration. METHODS: Subjects with radiographic knee chondrocalcinosis (n = 90, age 67.7 ± 7.3 years, 50 women) were selected from the Osteoarthritis Initiative and matched to controls without radiographic chondrocalcinosis (n = 90). Visualization of calcium-containing crystals (CaC) was compared between 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo (T1GE), 3D dual echo steady-state (DESS), 2D intermediate-weighted (IW), and proton density (PD)-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) sequences obtained with 3T MRI and correlated with a semiquantitative CaC score obtained from radiographs. Structural abnormalities were assessed using Whole-Organ MRI Score (WORMS) and logistic regression models were used to compare cartilage compartments with and without CaC. RESULTS: Correlations between CaC counts of MRI sequences and degree of radiographic calcifications were highest for GE (rT1GE = 0.73, P < 0.001; rDESS = 0.68, P < 0.001) compared to other sequences (P > 0.05). Meniscus WORMS was significantly higher in subjects with chondrocalcinosis compared to controls (P = 0.005). Cartilage defects were significantly more frequent in compartments with CaC than without (patella: P = 0.006; lateral tibia: P < 0.001; lateral femur condyle: P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Gradient-echo sequences were most useful for the detection of chondrocalcinosis and presence of CaC was associated with higher prevalence of cartilage and meniscal damage. KEY POINTS: • Magnetic resonance imaging is useful for assessing burden of calcium-containing crystals (CaC). • Gradient-echo sequences are superior to fast spin echo sequences for CaC imaging. • Presence of CaC is associated with meniscus and cartilage degradation.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ability of different MRI sequences to detect chondrocalcinosis within knee cartilage and menisci, and to analyze the association with joint degeneration. METHODS: Subjects with radiographic knee chondrocalcinosis (n = 90, age 67.7 ± 7.3 years, 50 women) were selected from the Osteoarthritis Initiative and matched to controls without radiographic chondrocalcinosis (n = 90). Visualization of calcium-containing crystals (CaC) was compared between 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo (T1GE), 3D dual echo steady-state (DESS), 2D intermediate-weighted (IW), and proton density (PD)-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) sequences obtained with 3T MRI and correlated with a semiquantitative CaC score obtained from radiographs. Structural abnormalities were assessed using Whole-Organ MRI Score (WORMS) and logistic regression models were used to compare cartilage compartments with and without CaC. RESULTS: Correlations between CaC counts of MRI sequences and degree of radiographic calcifications were highest for GE (rT1GE = 0.73, P < 0.001; rDESS = 0.68, P < 0.001) compared to other sequences (P > 0.05). Meniscus WORMS was significantly higher in subjects with chondrocalcinosis compared to controls (P = 0.005). Cartilage defects were significantly more frequent in compartments with CaC than without (patella: P = 0.006; lateral tibia: P < 0.001; lateral femur condyle: P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Gradient-echo sequences were most useful for the detection of chondrocalcinosis and presence of CaC was associated with higher prevalence of cartilage and meniscal damage. KEY POINTS: • Magnetic resonance imaging is useful for assessing burden of calcium-containing crystals (CaC). • Gradient-echo sequences are superior to fast spin echo sequences for CaC imaging. • Presence of CaC is associated with meniscus and cartilage degradation.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cartilage imaging; Chondrocalcinosis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Musculoskeletal imaging; Osteoarthritis
Authors: T Neogi; M Nevitt; J Niu; M P LaValley; D J Hunter; R Terkeltaub; L Carbone; H Chen; T Harris; K Kwoh; A Guermazi; D T Felson Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2006-06
Authors: Judong Pan; Jean-Baptiste Pialat; Tom Joseph; Daniel Kuo; Gabby B Joseph; Michael C Nevitt; Thomas M Link Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-09-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: M Kretzschmar; W Lin; L Nardo; G B Joseph; D D Dunlop; U Heilmeier; M C Nevitt; H Alizai; C E McCulloch; J A Lynch; T M Link Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Christoph Stehling; Hans Liebl; Roland Krug; Nancy E Lane; Michael C Nevitt; John Lynch; Charles E McCulloch; Thomas M Link Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Yubo Sun; David R Mauerhan; Patrick R Honeycutt; Jeffrey S Kneisl; H James Norton; Natalia Zinchenko; Edward N Hanley; Helen E Gruber Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Gabby B Joseph; Charles E McCulloch; Michael C Nevitt; Jan Neumann; Alexandra S Gersing; Martin Kretzschmar; Benedikt J Schwaiger; John A Lynch; Ursula Heilmeier; Nancy E Lane; Thomas M Link Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Sarah C Foreman; Jan Neumann; Gabby B Joseph; Michael C Nevitt; Charles E McCulloch; Nancy E Lane; Thomas M Link Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Sara K Tedeschi; Fabio Becce; Tristan Pascart; Ali Guermazi; Jean-François Budzik; Nicola Dalbeth; Georgios Filippou; Annamaria Iagnocco; Minna J Kohler; Jean-Denis Laredo; Stacy E Smith; F Joseph Simeone; Janeth Yinh; Hyon Choi; Abhishek Abhishek Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 5.178
Authors: S C Foreman; A S Gersing; C E von Schacky; G B Joseph; J Neumann; N E Lane; C E McCulloch; M C Nevitt; T M Link Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Magdalena Posadzy; Gabby B Joseph; Charles E McCulloch; Michael C Nevitt; John A Lynch; Nancy E Lane; Thomas M Link Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2020-06-22 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Pia M Jungmann; Thomas Baum; Michael C Nevitt; Lorenzo Nardo; Alexandra S Gersing; Nancy E Lane; Charles E McCulloch; Ernst J Rummeny; Thomas M Link Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sarah C Foreman; Yao Liu; Michael C Nevitt; Jan Neumann; Gabby B Joseph; Nancy E Lane; Charles E McCulloch; Thomas M Link Journal: Cartilage Date: 2020-06-21 Impact factor: 3.117