| Literature DB >> 23887285 |
J-P Pelletier1, C Cooper, C Peterfy, J-Y Reginster, M-L Brandi, O Bruyère, R Chapurlat, F Cicuttini, P G Conaghan, M Doherty, H Genant, G Giacovelli, M C Hochberg, D J Hunter, J A Kanis, M Kloppenburg, J-D Laredo, T McAlindon, M Nevitt, J-P Raynauld, R Rizzoli, C Zilkens, F W Roemer, J Martel-Pelletier, A Guermazi.
Abstract
Knee osteoarthritis is associated with structural changes in the joint. Despite its many drawbacks, radiography is the current standard for evaluating joint structure in trials of potential disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs. MRI is a non-invasive alternative that provides comprehensive imaging of the whole joint. Frequently used MRI measurements in knee osteoarthritis are cartilage volume and thickness; others include synovitis, synovial fluid effusions, bone marrow lesions (BML) and meniscal damage. Joint replacement is considered a clinically relevant outcome in knee osteoarthritis; however, its utility in clinical trials is limited. An alternative is virtual knee replacement on the basis of symptoms and structural damage. MRI may prove to be a good alternative to radiography in definitions of knee replacement. One of the MRI parameters that predicts knee replacement is medial compartment cartilage volume/thickness, which correlates with radiographic joint space width, is sensitive to change, and predicts outcomes in a continuous manner. Other MRI parameters include BML and meniscal lesions. MRI appears to be a viable alternative to radiography for the evaluation of structural changes in knee osteoarthritis and prediction of joint replacement.Entities:
Keywords: Knee Osteoarthritis; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Outcomes research
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23887285 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203631
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Rheum Dis ISSN: 0003-4967 Impact factor: 19.103