Literature DB >> 26374879

Does the aortic annulus undergo conformational change throughout the cardiac cycle? A systematic review.

Dominika Suchá1, Volkan Tuncay2, Niek H J Prakken3, Tim Leiner4, Peter M A van Ooijen5, Matthijs Oudkerk3, Ricardo P J Budde4.   

Abstract

Accurate annular sizing in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) planning is essential. It is now widely recognized that the annulus is an oval structure in most patients, but it remains unclear if the annulus undergoes change in size and shape during the cardiac cycle that may impact prosthesis size selection. Our aim was to assess whether the aortic annulus undergoes dynamic conformational change during the cardiac cycle and to evaluate possible implications for prosthesis size selection. We performed a systematic search in PubMed and Embase databases and reviewed all available literature on aortic annulus measurements in at least two cardiac phases. Twenty-nine articles published from 2001 to 2014 were included. In total, 2021 subjects with and without aortic stenosis were evaluated with a mean age ranging from 11 ± 3.6 to 84.9 ± 7.2 years. Two- and three-dimensional echocardiography was performed in six studies each, magnetic resonance imaging was used in one and computed tomography in 17 studies. In general, the aortic annulus was more circular in systole and predominantly oval in diastole. Whereas the annular long-axis diameter showed insignificant change throughout the cycle, the short-axis diameter, area, and perimeter were significantly larger in systole compared with diastole. Hence, the aortic annulus does undergo dynamic changes during the cardiac cycle. In patients with large conformational changes, diastolic compared with systolic measurements can result in undersizing TAVI prostheses. Due to the complex annular anatomy and dynamic change, three-dimensional assessment in multiple phases has utmost importance in TAVI planning to improve prosthesis sizing. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic annulus; Conformational change; Imaging parameter; TAVI sizing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26374879     DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jev210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  14 in total

Review 1.  CT support of cardiac structural interventions.

Authors:  Michaela M Hell; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Assessment of aortic valve tract dynamics using automatic tracking of 3D transesophageal echocardiographic images.

Authors:  Sandro Queirós; Pedro Morais; Wolfgang Fehske; Alexandros Papachristidis; Jens-Uwe Voigt; Jaime C Fonseca; Jan D'hooge; João L Vilaça
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance as a reliable alternative to cardiovascular computed tomography and transesophageal echocardiography for aortic annulus valve sizing.

Authors:  Riccardo Faletti; Marco Gatti; Stefano Salizzoni; Laura Bergamasco; Rodolfo Bonamini; Domenica Garabello; Walter Grosso Marra; Michele La Torre; Mara Morello; Simona Veglia; Paolo Fonio; Mauro Rinaldi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Is MRI equivalent to CT in the guidance of TAVR? A pilot study.

Authors:  Agnes Mayr; Gert Klug; Sebastian J Reinstadler; Hans-Josef Feistritzer; Martin Reindl; Christian Kremser; Christof Kranewitter; Nikolaos Bonaros; Guy Friedrich; Gudrun Feuchtner; Bernhard Metzler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Recommendations in pre-procedural imaging assessment for TAVI intervention: SIC-SIRM position paper part 2 (CT and MR angiography, standard medical reporting, future perspectives).

Authors:  Riccardo Marano; Gianluca Pontone; Eustachio Agricola; Brunilda Alushi; Antonio Bartorelli; Matteo Cameli; Nazario Carrabba; Antonio Esposito; Riccardo Faletti; Marco Francone; Nicola Galea; Paolo Golino; Marco Guglielmo; Anna Palmisano; Sonia Petronio; Maria Petullà; Silvia Pradella; Flavio Ribichini; Francesco Romeo; Vincenzo Russo; Salvatore Scandura; Nicolò Schicchi; Carmen Spaccarotella; Fabrizio Tomai; Ciro Indolfi; Maurizio Centonze
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 6.  Preoperative TAVR Planning: How to Do It.

Authors:  Rodrigo Petersen Saadi; Ana Paula Tagliari; Eduardo Keller Saadi; Marcelo Haertel Miglioranza; Carisi Anne Polanczyck
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Comparison of Dacron ring and suture annuloplasty for aortic valve repair-a porcine study.

Authors:  Leila Louise Benhassen; Diana Mathilde Ropcke; Mona Sharghbin; Troels Lading; Jens Kæstel Skov; Marcell Juan Tjørnild; Karen Bagger Poulsen; Tommy Bechsgaard; Søren Nielsen Skov; Sten Lyager Nielsen; John Michael Hasenkam
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-05

8.  Structural Responses of Integrated Parametric Aortic Valve in an Electro-Mechanical Full Heart Model.

Authors:  Adi Morany; Karin Lavon; Danny Bluestein; Ashraf Hamdan; Rami Haj-Ali
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Asymmetric Dynamics of the Native Aortic Annulus Evaluated by Force Transducer and Sonomicrometry in a Porcine Model.

Authors:  Leila Louise Benhassen; Diana Mathilde Ropcke; Troels Lading; Jens Kæstel Skov; Tommy Bechsgaard; Søren Nielsen Skov; Sten Lyager Nielsen; John Michael Hasenkam
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.495

Review 10.  Multimodality Imaging of the Anatomy of the Aortic Root.

Authors:  Vera Lucia Paiocchi; Francesco F Faletra; Enrico Ferrari; Susanne Anna Schlossbauer; Laura Anna Leo; Francesco Maisano
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2021-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.