Literature DB >> 18410217

Intention to communicate BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic test results to the family.

Andrea M Barsevick1, Susan V Montgomery, Karen Ruth, Eric A Ross, Brian L Egleston, Ruth Bingler, John Malick, Suzanne M Miller, Terrence P Cescon, Mary B Daly.   

Abstract

Guided by the theory of planned behavior, this analysis explores the communication skills of women who had genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2. The key outcome was intention to tell test results to adult first-degree relatives. The theory predicts that global and specific attitudes, global and specific perceived social norms, and perceived control will influence the communication of genetic test results. A logistic regression model revealed that global attitude (p < .05), specific social influence (p < .01), and perceived control (p < .05) were significant predictors of intention to tell. When gender and generation of relatives were added to the regression, participants were more likely to convey genetic test results to female than to male relatives (p < .05) and were also more likely to communicate test results to children (p < .01) or siblings (p < .05) than to parents. However, this association depended on knowing the relative's opinion of genetic testing. Intention to tell was lowest among participants who did not know their relative's opinion. These results extend the theory of planned behavior by showing that gender and generation influence intention when the relative's opinion is unknown. (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18410217     DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.22.2.303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Psychol        ISSN: 0893-3200


  14 in total

1.  An exploration of the communication preferences regarding genetic testing in individuals from families with identified breast/ovarian cancer mutations.

Authors:  Paboda Ratnayake; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser; Graeme Suthers; Melanie A Price; Jessica Duffy; Kathy Tucker
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Family communication following BRCA1/2 genetic testing: a close look at the process.

Authors:  Darquise Lafrenière; Karine Bouchard; Béatrice Godard; Jacques Simard; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  The big reveal: Family disclosure patterns of BRCA genetic test results among young Black women with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Claire C Conley; Dana Ketcher; Maija Reblin; Monica L Kasting; Deborah Cragun; Jongphil Kim; Kimlin Tam Ashing; Cheryl L Knott; Chanita Hughes-Halbert; Tuya Pal; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Patients' Attitudes Towards Disclosure of Genetic Test Results to Family Members: The Impact of Patients' Sociodemographic Background and Counseling Experience.

Authors:  Roy Gilbar; Stavit Shalev; Ronen Spiegel; Elon Pras; Michal Berkenstadt; Michal Sagi; Adi Ben-Yehuda; Pnina Mor; Shlomit Perry; Tzipora Falik Zaccai; Zvi Borochowitz; Sivia Barnoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Awareness and preferences regarding BRCA1/2 genetic counseling and testing among Latinas and non-Latina white women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Amanda Dawn Gammon; Erin Rothwell; Rebecca Simmons; Jan T Lowery; Lori Ballinger; Deirdre A Hill; Kenneth M Boucher; Anita Yeomans Kinney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Discussion of photoprotection, screening, and risk behaviors with children and grandchildren after melanoma genetic testing.

Authors:  Yelena P Wu; Lisa G Aspinwall; Timothy C Michaelis; Tammy Stump; Wendy G Kohlmann; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-06-23

Review 7.  Care delivery considerations for widespread and equitable implementation of inherited cancer predisposition testing.

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Anita Y Kinney; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 5.225

8.  Preparing individuals to communicate genetic test results to their relatives: report of a randomized control trial.

Authors:  Susan V Montgomery; Andrea M Barsevick; Brian L Egleston; Ruth Bingler; Karen Ruth; Suzanne M Miller; John Malick; Terrence P Cescon; Mary B Daly
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  A family genetic risk communication framework: guiding tool development in genetics health services.

Authors:  Miriam E Wiens; Brenda J Wilson; Christina Honeywell; Holly Etchegary
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-01-15

10.  Do Breast Cancer Patients Tested in the Oncology Care Setting Share BRCA Mutation Results with Family Members and Health Care Providers?

Authors:  Susan T Vadaparampil; Teri Malo; Cara de la Cruz; Juliette Christie
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.