Literature DB >> 26371319

Complex constraints on allometry revealed by artificial selection on the wing of Drosophila melanogaster.

Geir H Bolstad1, Jason A Cassara2, Eladio Márquez2, Thomas F Hansen3, Kim van der Linde2, David Houle2, Christophe Pélabon4.   

Abstract

Precise exponential scaling with size is a fundamental aspect of phenotypic variation. These allometric power laws are often invariant across taxa and have long been hypothesized to reflect developmental constraints. Here we test this hypothesis by investigating the evolutionary potential of an allometric scaling relationship in drosophilid wing shape that is nearly invariant across 111 species separated by at least 50 million years of evolution. In only 26 generations of artificial selection in a population of Drosophila melanogaster, we were able to drive the allometric slope to the outer range of those found among the 111 sampled species. This response was rapidly lost when selection was suspended. Only a small proportion of this reversal could be explained by breakup of linkage disequilibrium, and direct selection on wing shape is also unlikely to explain the reversal, because the more divergent wing shapes produced by selection on the allometric intercept did not revert. We hypothesize that the reversal was instead caused by internal selection arising from pleiotropic links to unknown traits. Our results also suggest that the observed selection response in the allometric slope was due to a component expressed late in larval development and that variation in earlier development did not respond to selection. Together, these results are consistent with a role for pleiotropic constraints in explaining the remarkable evolutionary stability of allometric scaling.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allometry; artificial selection; comparative analyses; developmental constraints; pleiotropy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26371319      PMCID: PMC4629349          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1505357112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  31 in total

1.  Reevaluation of phylogeny in the Drosophila obscura species group based on combined analysis of nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  P M O'Grady
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.286

Review 2.  The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution.

Authors:  S J Arnold; M E Pfrender; A G Jones
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Evolutionary constraint and ecological consequences.

Authors:  Douglas J Futuyma
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Developmental constraints on the evolution of wing-body allometry in Manduca sexta.

Authors:  Alexandra Tobler; H Frederik Nijhout
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.930

5.  Natural selection and developmental constraints in the evolution of allometries.

Authors:  W Anthony Frankino; Bas J Zwaan; David L Stern; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The Croonian Lecture, 1991. Genostasis and the limits to evolution.

Authors:  A D Bradshaw
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1991-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Exploring evolutionary constraints is a task for an integrative evolutionary biology.

Authors:  P M Brakefield; J C Roskam
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Internal and external constraints in the evolution of morphological allometries in a butterfly.

Authors:  W Anthony Frankino; Bas J Zwaan; David L Stern; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  A supermatrix-based molecular phylogeny of the family Drosophilidae.

Authors:  Kim van der Linde; David Houle; Greg S Spicer; Scott J Steppan
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Automated measurement of Drosophila wings.

Authors:  David Houle; Jason Mezey; Paul Galpern; Ashley Carter
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  30 in total

1.  Evolvability and nonevolvability of allometric slopes.

Authors:  Jon F Harrison
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Why does allometry evolve so slowly?

Authors:  David Houle; Luke T Jones; Ryan Fortune; Jacqueline L Sztepanacz
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

Review 3.  Correlational selection in the age of genomics.

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Stevan J Arnold; Reinhard Bürger; Katalin Csilléry; Jeremy Draghi; Jonathan M Henshaw; Adam G Jones; Stephen De Lisle; David A Marques; Katrina McGuigan; Monique N Simon; Anna Runemark
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Mutation predicts 40 million years of fly wing evolution.

Authors:  David Houle; Geir H Bolstad; Kim van der Linde; Thomas F Hansen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Burrowing below ground: interaction between soil mechanics and evolution of subterranean mammals.

Authors:  Angelo Rosario Carotenuto; Federico Guarracino; Radim Šumbera; Massimiliano Fraldi
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  A Multivariate Genome-Wide Association Study of Wing Shape in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  William Pitchers; Jessica Nye; Eladio J Márquez; Alycia Kowalski; Ian Dworkin; David Houle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The sex-limited effects of mutations in the EGFR and TGF-β signaling pathways on shape and size sexual dimorphism and allometry in the Drosophila wing.

Authors:  Nicholas D Testa; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 0.900

8.  Modularity: genes, development and evolution.

Authors:  Diogo Melo; Arthur Porto; James M Cheverud; Gabriel Marroig
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 13.915

9.  Conserved G-matrices of morphological and life-history traits among continental and island blue tit populations.

Authors:  B Delahaie; A Charmantier; S Chantepie; D Garant; M Porlier; C Teplitsky
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Selection on skewed characters and the paradox of stasis.

Authors:  Suzanne Bonamour; Céline Teplitsky; Anne Charmantier; Pierre-André Crochet; Luis-Miguel Chevin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.