Literature DB >> 27038022

The sex-limited effects of mutations in the EGFR and TGF-β signaling pathways on shape and size sexual dimorphism and allometry in the Drosophila wing.

Nicholas D Testa1,2, Ian Dworkin3,4,5.   

Abstract

Much of the morphological diversity in nature-including among sexes within a species-is a direct consequence of variation in size and shape. However, disentangling variation in sexual dimorphism for both shape (SShD), size (SSD), and their relationship with one another remains complex. Understanding how genetic variation influences both size and shape together, and how this in turn influences SSD and SShD, is challenging. In this study, we utilize Drosophila wing size and shape as a model system to investigate how mutations influence size and shape as modulated by sex. Previous work has demonstrated that mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling components can influence both wing size and shape. In this study, we re-analyze this data to specifically address how they impact the relationship between size and shape in a sex-specific manner, in turn altering the pattern of sexual dimorphism. While most mutations influence shape overall, only a subset have a genotypic specific effect that influences SShD. Furthermore, while we observe sex-specific patterns of allometric shape variation, the effects of most mutations on allometry tend to be small. We discuss this within the context of using mutational analysis to understand sexual size and shape dimorphism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allometry; Drosophila; Geometric morphometrics; Mutational analysis; Sexual dimorphism; Shape; Signal transduction; Size

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27038022      PMCID: PMC4899140          DOI: 10.1007/s00427-016-0534-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Genes Evol        ISSN: 0949-944X            Impact factor:   0.900


  56 in total

1.  Sexual conflict in wing size and shape in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J K Abbott; S Bedhomme; A K Chippindale
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 2.411

2.  Evolution of sexual dimorphism and male dimorphism in the expression of beetle horns: phylogenetic evidence for modularity, evolutionary lability, and constraint.

Authors:  Douglas J Emlen; John Hunt; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Splitting the Hedgehog signal: sex and patterning in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jamila I Horabin
Journal:  Development       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 6.868

4.  The evolution of sexual dimorphism in animals: Hypotheses and tests.

Authors:  A V Hedrick; E J Temeles
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Diversification of doublesex function underlies morph-, sex-, and species-specific development of beetle horns.

Authors:  Teiya Kijimoto; Armin P Moczek; Justen Andrews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Epidermal growth factor receptor and transforming growth factor-beta signaling contributes to variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Ian Dworkin; Greg Gibson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: testing two hypotheses for Rensch's rule in the water strider Aquarius remigis.

Authors:  Daphne J Fairbairn
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 8.  Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences.

Authors:  Arjun Raj; Alexander van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  The pace of morphological change: historical transformation of skull shape in St Bernard dogs.

Authors:  Abby Grace Drake; Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Generation of multiple antagonistic domains along the proximodistal axis during Drosophila leg development.

Authors:  M Abu-Shaar; R S Mann
Journal:  Development       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  5 in total

1.  In vivo severity ranking of Ras pathway mutations associated with developmental disorders.

Authors:  Granton A Jindal; Yogesh Goyal; Kei Yamaya; Alan S Futran; Iason Kountouridis; Courtney A Balgobin; Trudi Schüpbach; Rebecca D Burdine; Stanislav Y Shvartsman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Why does allometry evolve so slowly?

Authors:  David Houle; Luke T Jones; Ryan Fortune; Jacqueline L Sztepanacz
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

3.  Regulation of Drosophila Lifespan by bellwether Promoter Alleles.

Authors:  Júlia Frankenberg Garcia; Mary Anna Carbone; Trudy F C Mackay; Robert R H Anholt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Drosophila models of pathogenic copy-number variant genes show global and non-neuronal defects during development.

Authors:  Tanzeen Yusuff; Matthew Jensen; Sneha Yennawar; Lucilla Pizzo; Siddharth Karthikeyan; Dagny J Gould; Avik Sarker; Erika Gedvilaite; Yurika Matsui; Janani Iyer; Zhi-Chun Lai; Santhosh Girirajan
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  MAPPER: An Open-Source, High-Dimensional Image Analysis Pipeline Unmasks Differential Regulation of Drosophila Wing Features.

Authors:  Nilay Kumar; Francisco J Huizar; Keity J Farfán-Pira; Pavel A Brodskiy; Dharsan K Soundarrajan; Marcos Nahmad; Jeremiah J Zartman
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.772

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.