Literature DB >> 15692049

Natural selection and developmental constraints in the evolution of allometries.

W Anthony Frankino1, Bas J Zwaan, David L Stern, Paul M Brakefield.   

Abstract

In animals, scaling relationships between appendages and body size exhibit high interspecific variation but low intraspecific variation. This pattern could result from natural selection for specific allometries or from developmental constraints on patterns of differential growth. We performed artificial selection on the allometry between forewing area and body size in a butterfly to test for developmental constraints, and then used the resultant increased range of phenotypic variation to quantify natural selection on the scaling relationship. Our results show that the short-term evolution of allometries is not limited by developmental constraints. Instead, scaling relationships are shaped by strong natural selection.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15692049      PMCID: PMC3198854          DOI: 10.1126/science.1105409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  8 in total

1.  Developmental interactions and the constituents of quantitative variation.

Authors:  J B Wolf; W A Frankino; A F Agrawal; E D Brodie; A J Moore
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  The development and evolution of exaggerated morphologies in insects.

Authors:  D J Emlen; H F Nijhout
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  Costs and the diversification of exaggerated animal structures.

Authors:  D J Emlen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Habitat fragmentation and insect flight: a changing 'design' in a changing landscape?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Captivity masks inbreeding effects on male mating success in butterflies.

Authors:  Mathieu Joron; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-07-10       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Selection on wing allometry in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K E Weber
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny.

Authors:  S J Gould
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1966-11

Review 8.  The developmental basis for allometry in insects.

Authors:  D L Stern; D J Emlen
Journal:  Development       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.868

  8 in total
  40 in total

1.  A general basis for quarter-power scaling in animals.

Authors:  Jayanth R Banavar; Melanie E Moses; James H Brown; John Damuth; Andrea Rinaldo; Richard M Sibly; Amos Maritan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Complex constraints on allometry revealed by artificial selection on the wing of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Geir H Bolstad; Jason A Cassara; Eladio Márquez; Thomas F Hansen; Kim van der Linde; David Houle; Christophe Pélabon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress.

Authors:  Luc F Bussière; John Hunt; Kai N Stölting; Michael D Jennions; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 4.  Hormone-mediated suites as adaptations and evolutionary constraints.

Authors:  Joel W McGlothlin; Ellen D Ketterson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Internal and external constraints in the evolution of morphological allometries in a butterfly.

Authors:  W Anthony Frankino; Bas J Zwaan; David L Stern; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  How much do genetic covariances alter the rate of adaptation?

Authors:  Aneil F Agrawal; John R Stinchcombe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Availability of public goods shapes the evolution of competing metabolic strategies.

Authors:  Herwig Bachmann; Martin Fischlechner; Iraes Rabbers; Nakul Barfa; Filipe Branco dos Santos; Douwe Molenaar; Bas Teusink
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Diversity trends and their ontogenetic basis: an exploration of allometric disparity in rodents.

Authors:  Laura A B Wilson; Marcelo R Sánchez-Villagra
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Why does allometry evolve so slowly?

Authors:  David Houle; Luke T Jones; Ryan Fortune; Jacqueline L Sztepanacz
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

10.  The pace of morphological change: historical transformation of skull shape in St Bernard dogs.

Authors:  Abby Grace Drake; Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.