Literature DB >> 20433773

A supermatrix-based molecular phylogeny of the family Drosophilidae.

Kim van der Linde1, David Houle, Greg S Spicer, Scott J Steppan.   

Abstract

The genus Drosophila is diverse and heterogeneous and contains a large number of easy-to-rear species, so it is an attractive subject for comparative studies. The ability to perform such studies is currently compromised by the lack of a comprehensive phylogeny for Drosophila and related genera. The genus Drosophila as currently defined is known to be paraphyletic with respect to several other genera, but considerable uncertainty remains about other aspects of the phylogeny. Here, we estimate a phylogeny for 176 drosophilid (12 genera) and four non-drosophilid species, using gene sequences for up to 13 different genes per species (average: 4333 bp, five genes per species). This is the most extensive set of molecular data on drosophilids yet analysed. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted with maximum-likelihood (ML) and Bayesian approaches. Our analysis confirms that the genus Drosophila is paraphyletic with 100% support in the Bayesian analysis and 90% bootstrap support in the ML analysis. The subgenus Sophophora, which includes Drosophila melanogaster, is the sister clade of all the other subgenera as well as of most species of six other genera. This sister clade contains two large, well-supported subclades. The first subclade contains the Hawaiian Drosophila, the genus Scaptomyza, and the virilis-repleta radiation. The second contains the immigrans-tripunctata radiation as well as the genera Hirtodrosophila (except Hirtodrosophila duncani), Mycodrosophila, Zaprionus and Liodrosophila. We argue that these results support a taxonomic revision of the genus Drosophila.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20433773     DOI: 10.1017/S001667231000008X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)        ISSN: 0016-6723            Impact factor:   1.588


  46 in total

1.  Complex constraints on allometry revealed by artificial selection on the wing of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Geir H Bolstad; Jason A Cassara; Eladio Márquez; Thomas F Hansen; Kim van der Linde; David Houle; Christophe Pélabon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Macroevolutionary speciation rates are decoupled from the evolution of intrinsic reproductive isolation in Drosophila and birds.

Authors:  Daniel L Rabosky; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Patterns of molecular evolution of the germ line specification gene oskar suggest that a novel domain may contribute to functional divergence in Drosophila.

Authors:  Abha Ahuja; Cassandra G Extavour
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 0.900

4.  Mutation predicts 40 million years of fly wing evolution.

Authors:  David Houle; Geir H Bolstad; Kim van der Linde; Thomas F Hansen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Upper thermal limits of Drosophila are linked to species distributions and strongly constrained phylogenetically.

Authors:  Vanessa Kellermann; Johannes Overgaard; Ary A Hoffmann; Camilla Fløjgaard; Jens-Christian Svenning; Volker Loeschcke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Terrace Aware Data Structure for Phylogenomic Inference from Supermatrices.

Authors:  Olga Chernomor; Arndt von Haeseler; Bui Quang Minh
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  Plasticity for desiccation tolerance across Drosophila species is affected by phylogeny and climate in complex ways.

Authors:  Vanessa Kellermann; Ary A Hoffmann; Johannes Overgaard; Volker Loeschcke; Carla M Sgrò
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Epithelial Patterning, Morphogenesis, and Evolution: Drosophila Eggshell as a Model.

Authors:  Miriam Osterfield; Celeste A Berg; Stanislav Y Shvartsman
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 12.270

9.  Behavioral and environmental contributions to drosophilid social networks.

Authors:  Jacob A Jezovit; Rebecca Rooke; Jonathan Schneider; Joel D Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Simulating natural light and temperature cycles in the laboratory reveals differential effects on activity/rest rhythm of four Drosophilids.

Authors:  Priya M Prabhakaran; Vasu Sheeba
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.