Literature DB >> 10068920

"INTERMED": a method to assess health service needs. II. Results on its validity and clinical use.

F C Stiefel1, P de Jonge, F J Huyse, P Guex, J P Slaets, J S Lyons, J Spagnoli, M Vannotti.   

Abstract

The validity and clinical use of a recently developed instrument to assess health care needs of patients with a physical illness, called INTERMED, is investigated. The INTERMED combines data reflecting patients' biological, psychological, and social characteristics with information on health care utilization characteristics. An example of a patient population in which such an integral assessment can contribute to the appropriateness of care, are patients with low back pain of degenerative or unknown origin. It supports the validity and the clinical usefulness of the INTERMED when clinically relevant subgroups in this heterogeneous population can be identified and described based on their INTERMED scores. The INTERMED was utilized in a group of patients (N = 108) having low back pain who vary on the chronicity of complaints, functional status, and associated disability. All patients underwent a medical examination and responded to a battery of validated questionnaires assessing biological, psychological, and social aspects of their life. In addition, the patients were assessed by the INTERMED. It was studied whether it proved to be possible to form clinically meaningful groups of patients based on their INTERMED scores; for this, a hierarchical cluster analysis was performed. In order to clinically describe them, the groups of patients were compared with the data from the questionnaires. The cluster analysis on the INTERMED scores revealed three distinguishable groups of patients. Comparison with the questionnaires assessing biological, psychological, and social aspects of disease showed that one group can be characterized as complex patients with chronic complaints and reduced capacity to work who apply for a disability compensation. The other groups differed explicitly with regard to chronicity, but also on other variables. By means of the INTERMED, clinically relevant groups of patients can be identified, which supports its use in clinical practice and its use as a method to describe case mix for scientific or health care policy purposes. In addition, the INTERMED is easy to implement in daily clinical practice and can be of help to ease the operationalization of the biopychosocial model of disease. More information on its validity in different patient populations is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10068920     DOI: 10.1016/s0163-8343(98)00061-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry        ISSN: 0163-8343            Impact factor:   3.238


  26 in total

1.  Subclassification of low back pain: a cross-country comparison.

Authors:  Evdokia V Billis; Christopher J McCarthy; Jacqueline A Oldham
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The INTERMED: a screening instrument to identify multiple sclerosis patients in need of multidisciplinary treatment.

Authors:  E L J Hoogervorst; P de Jonge; B Jelles; F J Huyse; I Heeres; H M van der Ploeg; B M J Uitdehaag; C H Polman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Primary care physician insights into a typology of the complex patient in primary care.

Authors:  Danielle F Loeb; Ingrid A Binswanger; Carey Candrian; Elizabeth A Bayliss
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 4.  Definition of patient complexity in adults: A narrative review.

Authors:  Stefanie Nicolaus; Baptiste Crelier; Jacques D Donzé; Carole E Aubert
Journal:  J Multimorb Comorb       Date:  2022-02-25

Review 5.  Screening tools to identify patients with complex health needs at risk of high use of health care services: A scoping review.

Authors:  Valérie Marcoux; Maud-Christine Chouinard; Fatoumata Diadiou; Isabelle Dufour; Catherine Hudon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Reliability of INTERMED Spanish version and applicability in liver transplant patients: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Elena Lobo; M José Rabanaque; M Luisa Bellido; Antonio Lobo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Predicting non return to work after orthopaedic trauma: the Wallis Occupational Rehabilitation RisK (WORRK) model.

Authors:  François Luthi; Olivier Deriaz; Philippe Vuistiner; Cyrille Burrus; Roger Hilfiker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Clinician and Patient-reported Outcomes Are Associated With Psychological Factors in Patients With Chronic Shoulder Pain.

Authors:  Adrian Wolfensberger; Philippe Vuistiner; Michel Konzelmann; Chantal Plomb-Holmes; Bertrand Léger; François Luthi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  BMI Course Over 10 Years After Bariatric Surgery and Biopsychosocial Complexity Assessed with the INTERMED: a Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Yann Corminboeuf; Beate Wild; Catherine Zdrojewski; Dieter Schellberg; Lucie Favre; Michel Suter; Friedrich Stiefel
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Intoxicated persons showing challenging behavior demand complexity interventions: a pilot study at the interface of the ER and the complexity intervention unit.

Authors:  Stefan M H Verheesen; Freek Ten Doesschate; Maarten A van Schijndel; Rutger Jan van der Gaag; Wiepke Cahn; Jeroen A van Waarde
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-12       Impact factor: 5.270

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.