Literature DB >> 32134456

Unmet information needs of clinical teams delivering care to complex patients and design strategies to address those needs.

Deborah J Cohen1,2, Tamar Wyte-Lake1, David A Dorr2, Rachel Gold3,4, Richard J Holden5, Richelle J Koopman6, Joshua Colasurdo2, Nathaniel Warren4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify the unmet information needs of clinical teams delivering care to patients with complex medical, social, and economic needs; and to propose principles for redesigning electronic health records (EHR) to address these needs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this observational study, we interviewed and observed care teams in 9 community health centers in Oregon and Washington to understand their use of the EHR when caring for patients with complex medical and socioeconomic needs. Data were analyzed using a comparative approach to identify EHR users' information needs, which were then used to produce EHR design principles.
RESULTS: Analyses of > 300 hours of observations and 51 interviews identified 4 major categories of information needs related to: consistency of social determinants of health (SDH) documentation; SDH information prioritization and changes to this prioritization; initiation and follow-up of community resource referrals; and timely communication of SDH information. Within these categories were 10 unmet information needs to be addressed by EHR designers. We propose the following EHR design principles to address these needs: enhance the flexibility of EHR documentation workflows; expand the ability to exchange information within teams and between systems; balance innovation and standardization of health information technology systems; organize and simplify information displays; and prioritize and reduce information.
CONCLUSION: Developing EHR tools that are simple, accessible, easy to use, and able to be updated by a range of professionals is critical. The identified information needs and design principles should inform developers and implementers working in community health centers and other settings where complex patients receive care.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  community health centers, qualitative research; electronic health records; primary health care; social determinants of health

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32134456      PMCID: PMC7647291          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  34 in total

1.  A typology of electronic health record workarounds in small-to-medium size primary care practices.

Authors:  Asia Friedman; Jesse C Crosson; Jenna Howard; Elizabeth C Clark; Maria Pellerano; Ben-Tzion Karsh; Benjamin Crabtree; Carlos Roberto Jaén; Deborah J Cohen
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  "Community vital signs": incorporating geocoded social determinants into electronic records to promote patient and population health.

Authors:  Andrew W Bazemore; Erika K Cottrell; Rachel Gold; Lauren S Hughes; Robert L Phillips; Heather Angier; Timothy E Burdick; Mark A Carrozza; Jennifer E DeVoe
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  TURF: toward a unified framework of EHR usability.

Authors:  Jiajie Zhang; Muhammad F Walji
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Who governs federally qualified health centers?

Authors:  Brad Wright
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.265

5.  Closing the loop with an enhanced referral management system.

Authors:  Harley Ramelson; Amanda Nederlof; Sam Karmiy; Pamela Neri; David Kiernan; Rajlakshmi Krishnamurthy; Adrienne Allen; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Primary care physician insights into a typology of the complex patient in primary care.

Authors:  Danielle F Loeb; Ingrid A Binswanger; Carey Candrian; Elizabeth A Bayliss
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Rework and workarounds in nurse medication administration process: implications for work processes and patient safety.

Authors:  Jonathon R B Halbesleben; Grant T Savage; Douglas S Wakefield; Bonnie J Wakefield
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2010 Apr-Jun

8.  Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety.

Authors:  Ross Koppel; Tosha Wetterneck; Joel Leon Telles; Ben-Tzion Karsh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Physicians' perceptions of the impact of the EHR on the collection and retrieval of psychosocial information in outpatient diabetes care.

Authors:  Charles Senteio; Tiffany Veinot; Julia Adler-Milstein; Caroline Richardson
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 4.046

10.  Patient complexity: more than comorbidity. the vector model of complexity.

Authors:  Monika M Safford; Jeroan J Allison; Catarina I Kiefe
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  3 in total

1.  Celebrating the International Year of the Nurse and Midwife: A look at nursing in JAMIA.

Authors:  Suzanne Bakken; Gregory Alexander
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Documentation and review of social determinants of health data in the EHR: measures and associated insights.

Authors:  Michael Wang; Matthew S Pantell; Laura M Gottlieb; Julia Adler-Milstein
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 7.942

3.  A roadmap for cardiovascular care after release from incarceration: uses of a smartphone application.

Authors:  Pamela J Surkan; Lisa B Puglisi; Karim Butler; Nika Elmi; Wayne W Zachary
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 7.942

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.