| Literature DB >> 26371041 |
Mohammed Al Thani1, Al Anoud Al Thani2, Walaa Al-Chetachi3, Badria Al Malki4, Shamseldin A H Khalifa5, Ahmad Haj Bakri6, Nahla Hwalla7, Lara Nasreddine8, Farah Naja9.
Abstract
Women of childbearing age are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of elevated blood pressure (BP), with dietary and lifestyle habits being increasingly recognized as important modifiable environmental risk factors for this condition. Using data from the National STEPwise survey conducted in Qatar in year 2012, we aimed to examine lifestyle patterns and their association with elevated BP among Qatari women of childbearing age (18-45 years). Socio-demographic, lifestyle, dietary, anthropometric and BP data were used (n = 747). Principal component factor analysis was applied to identify the patterns using the frequency of consumption of 13 foods/food groups, physical activity level, and smoking status. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the association of the identified lifestyle patterns with elevated BP and to examine the socio-demographic correlates of these patterns. Three lifestyle patterns were identified: a "healthy" pattern characterized by intake of fruits, natural juices, and vegetables; a "fast food & smoking" pattern characterized by fast foods, sweetened beverages, and sweets, in addition to smoking; and a "traditional sedentary" pattern which consisted of refined grains, dairy products, and meat in addition to low physical activity. The fast food & smoking and the traditional & sedentary patterns were associated with an approximately 2-fold increase in the risk of elevated BP in the study population. The findings of this study highlight the synergistic effect that diet, smoking and physical inactivity may have on the risk of elevated BP among Qatari women.Entities:
Keywords: Qatar; elevated blood pressure; factor analysis; lifestyle pattern; women
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26371041 PMCID: PMC4586550 DOI: 10.3390/nu7095355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Weighted socio-demographics, lifestyle and anthropometric characteristics of study participants by blood pressure status a (n = 747).
| Variable Name | Total | Normal Blood Pressure | Elevated Blood † Pressure | Significance †† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31.0 ± 7.0 | 30.5 ± 6.9 | 33.5 ± 6.9 | ||
| Up to intermediate level b | 140 (20) | 113 (17.6) | 24 (22.9) | |
| Finished high school | 280 (40) | 248 (38.7) | 35 (33.3) | |
| University/graduate level | 326 (43.7) | 280 (43.7) | 46 (43.8) | |
| Not married | 261 (34.9) | 233 (36.3) | 28 (26.4) | |
| Married | 486 (65.1) | 409 (63.7) | 78 (73.6) | |
| Governmental employee | 356 (47.7) | 309 (48.1) | 47 (44.8) | |
| Non-governmental employee c | 30 (4.0) | 26 (4.0) | 4 (3.8) | |
| Not working | 140 (18.7) | 124 (19.3) | 16 (15.2) | |
| Housewife | 221 (29.6) | 183 (28.5) | 38 (36.2) | |
| No | 485 (64.9) | 417 (65.0) | 68 (64.8) | |
| Yes | 262 (35.1) | 225 (35.0) | 37 (35.2) | |
| No | 240 (32.1) | 207 (32.2) | 33 (31.4) | |
| Yes | 507 (67.9) | 435 (67.8) | 72 (68.6) | |
| No | 267 (35.7) | 243 (37.9) | 24 (22.6) | |
| Yes | 480 (64.3) | 399 (62.1) | 82 (77.4) | |
| Vegetable oil | 714 (96.4) | 613 (96.2) | 101 (97.1) | |
| Animal oil | 27 (3.6) | 24 (3.8) | 3 (2.9) | |
| 2.4 ± 2.3 | 2.5 ± 2.4 | 2.1 ± 2.0 | ||
| Non smoker | 730 (97.7) | 628 (97.8) | 102 (97.1) | |
| Past smoker | 6 (0.8) | 6 (0.9) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Current smoker | 11 (1.5) | 8 (1.2) | 3 (2.9) | |
| 1.2 ± 2.9 | 1.2 ± 2.9 | 1.3 ± 3.0 | ||
| Low | 416 (55.8) | 352 (54.9) | 64 (61.0) | |
| Moderate | 162 (21.7) | 144 (22.5) | 18 (17.1) | |
| High | 168 (22.5) | 145 (22.6) | 23 (21.9) | |
| 389.9 ± 761.9 | 394.5 ± 772.7 | 369.2 ± 701.5 | ||
| 26.2 ± 37.7 | 25.5 ± 37.2 | 31.7 ± 40.6 | ||
| 55.5 ± 40.8 | 55.6 ± 41.1 | 54.3 ± 39.8 | ||
| 18.3 ± 30.8 | 18.9 ± 31.7 | 14.1 ± 23.9 | ||
| 183.6 ± 168.3 | 183.0 ± 164.4 | 189.5 ± 191.2 | ||
| 29.1 ± 7.2 | 28.7 ± 7.1 | 30.9 ± 6.9 | ||
| Obese(≥30 kg/m2) | 279 (37.3) | 226 (35.2) | 53 (50.0) |
Elevated blood pressure in this study was defined as either systolic pressure ≥130 or diastolic pressure ≥85 mm Hg; p-values were derived from t test and Chi Square test for continuous and categorical variables respectively; a Percentages are within column; b This category includes: no schooling, elementary and intermediate schooling; c This category includes: private and own business; d This includes passive smoking from family members and at work; * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 1Scree plot showing eigenvalues for the 15 components, extracted in weighted factor analysis of lifestyle and dietary data of study participants (n = 747).
Weighted factor loading matrix of the three identified lifestyle patterns among a nationally representative sample of Qatari women a (n = 747).
| Lifestyle Patterns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy | Fast Food & Smoking | ||
| Fruits | −0.20 | ||
| Beans | 0.27 | ||
| Natural juices | |||
| Vegetables | |||
| Fish | −0.21 | ||
| Dairy | 0.24 | 0.21 | |
| Fast foods | |||
| Sweetened beverages | |||
| Sweets | |||
| Smoking | |||
| Poultry | |||
| Refined grains | 0.22 | ||
| Whole grains | −0.21 | ||
| Physical activity (Mets/day) | |||
| Meat | |||
| Percent variance explained | 12.4 | 12.1 | 9.6 |
a Factor loadings of less than |0.2| were not listed in the table for simplicity. Loadings ≥ 0.3 are bolded.
Weighted dietary intake, smoking, and physical activity of study participants by tertiles of the three identified patterns’ scores a (n = 747).
| Factor Items | Healthy | Fast Food & Smoking | Traditional Sedentary | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Tertile | 3rd Tertile | 1st Tertile | 3rd Tertile | 1st Tertile | 3rd Tertile | |
| Mean ± SD | ||||||
| 1.2 ± 1.4 | 5.1 ± 2.4 ** | 3.6 ± 2.7 | 2.3 ± 2.3 ** | 3.5 ± 2.7 | 2.7 ± 2.3 * | |
| 0.8 ± 0.9 | 2.7 ± 2.1 ** | 1.3 ± 1.4 | 2.0 ± 2.1 ** | 1.2 ± 1.4 | 2.1 ± 2.0 ** | |
| 1.9 ± 2.0 | 5.3 ± 2.3 ** | 3.4 ± 2.7 | 3.5 ± 2.7 | 3.8 ± 2.8 | 3.0 ± 2.5 * | |
| 4.0 ± 2.7 | 6.5 ± 1.4 ** | 5.7 ± 2.2 | 5.0 ± 2.5 * | 5.5 ± 2.3 | 5.4 ± 2.3 | |
| 0.8 ± 0.8 | 2.2 ± 1.6 ** | 1.6 ± 1.3 | 1.3 ± 1.3 * | 1.7 ± 1.5 | 1.1 ± 1.1 ** | |
| 5.4 ± 2.5 | 6.2 ± 1.8 ** | 5.9 ± 2.1 | 5.9 ± 2.2 | 5.5 ± 2.4 | 6.3 ± 1.7 ** | |
| 1.7 ± 1.9 | 1.9 ± 2.0 | 0.6 ± 0.8 | 3.6 ± 2.3 ** | 1.9 ± 2.2 | 1.3 ± 1.4 ** | |
| 2.9 ± 2.9 | 2.2 ± 2.7 * | 0.6 ± 1.2 | 5.1 ± 2.6 ** | 2.2 ± 2.7 | 2.4 ± 2.7 * | |
| 4.3 ± 2.8 | 4.2 ± 2.6 | 2.4 ± 2.3 | 5.9 ± 1.9 ** | 3.9 ± 2.7 | 4.7 ± 2.6 * | |
| Non smoker | 239 (97.2) | 229 (99.1) | 259 (100.0) | 205 (94.0) ** | 233 (94.7) | 248 (100.0) ** |
| Past smoker | 1 (0.4) | 2 (0.9) | 0 (0.0) | 10 (4.6) | 3 (1.2) | 0 (0) |
| Current smoker | 6 (2.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (1.4) | 10 (4.1) | 0 (0) |
| 5.4 ± 2.2 | 4.7 ± 2.1 * | 4.0 ± 2.3 | 5.9 ± 1.8 ** | 4.4 ± 2.3 | 5.6 ± 2.0 ** | |
| 5.6 ± 2.4 | 5.2 ± 2.5 | 4.7 ± 2.8 | 5.8 ± 2.1 ** | 2.9 ± 2.5 | 7.0 ± 0.2 ** | |
| 0.9 ± 1.9 | 2.8 ± 2.9 ** | 2.6 ± 2.9 | 1.4 ± 2.3 ** | 4.0 ± 3.0 | 0.4 ± 1.1 ** | |
| 450 ± 770 | 372.3 ± 672.9 | 386.0 ± 677.9 | 463.5 ± 844.9 | 627.5 ± 1054.0 | 203.4 ± 429.0 ** | |
| 1.3 ± 1.4 | 2.0 ± 1.6 ** | 1.4 ± 1.3 | 1.9 ± 1.8 * | 1.2 ± 1.4 | 2.1 ± 1.8 ** | |
a Intake of the various food groups referred to frequency of consumption as expressed by number of days per week the food/food group was consumed; b For smoking the numbers represent n (%); * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.001.
Weighted odds ratio and their 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for the association of the identified lifestyle patterns with elevated blood pressure in the study population (n = 747).
| Dietary Patterns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy | Fast Food & Smoking | Traditional Sedentary | |
| Age adjusted model | |||
| 1st tertile | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| 2nd tertile | 1.3 (0.8–2.1) | 2.1 (1.2–3.5) | |
| 3rd tertile | 1.6 (0.9–2.5) | 1.2 (0.7–2.0) | |
| Multivariate model 2 a | |||
| 1st tertile | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| 2nd tertile | 1.3 (0.8–2.2) | ||
| 3rd tertile | 1.4 (0.9–2.2) | 1.1 (0.7–2.0) | |
a This model is adjusted for age, education, marital status, parental consanguinity, family history of blood pressure, number of meals not eaten at home, exposure to passive smoking and Body mass index (BMI).
Summary of studies investigating lifestyle factors and their associations with disease among adults.
| Authors’s Name | Study Population | Disease Outcome | Lifestyle Factors | Main Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Navarro Silvera | Subtypes of Esophageal and Gastric Cancer a | Meat & nitrate Fruit & vegetable Smoking & alcohol Legume & meat alternate Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) & body mass index (BMI) Fish & vitamin C | “Meat & nitrate” intake associated with increased risk of EA, GCA, and OGA “Fruit & vegetable” associated with reduced risk of EA, ESCC, and GCA “Smoking & alcohol” associated with increased risk of ESCC “GERD & obesity” associated with increased risk of EA and ESCC “Fish & vitamin C” associated with increased risk of ESCC | |
| Steele | N/A | Prudent pattern: regular consumption of fruit and vegetables, daily fresh-fruit juice, and fat-reduced milk; physical activity practice, protection against UV radiation, reduced soft drink consumption Risky pattern: fat-rich meat consumption, excessive alcoholic beverage intake, current smoking, excess TV watching (especially in men), regular soft drink consumption (especially in women) | N/A | |
| Waidyatilaka | Cardiometabolic risk variables b | Pattern 1: rice and rice flour-based products, pulses, seafood, fruits, vegetables and green leafy vegetables Pattern 2: wheat, wheat based products and tubers, red meat, and processed meat Pattern 3: snacks dairy products and poultry, low physical activity | Pattern 1 has no association with dysglycaemic risk Patterns 2 and 3 positively associated with dysglycaemic risk. Pattern 1 associated with increased HDL and reduced TC and TAG Pattern 2 associated with increased WC, BMI, FM% and hs-CRP and reduced FFM% and HDL Pattern 3 associated with increased WC, BMI, FM%, HbA1c, FBS, TC, TAG, and hs-CRP and reduced FFM% and HDL |
a Subtypes of Esophageal and Gastric Cancer: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA), other gastric cancers (OGA); b Cardiometabolic risk variables: dysglycaemic risk, waist circumference (WC), fat mass percentage (FM%), fat-free mass percentage (FFM%), glycosylated Hb (HbA1c), fasting blood sugar (FBS), total cholesterol (TC), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), High Density Lipoproteins (HDL); TriAcylGlycerids (TAG).