| Literature DB >> 31265481 |
Mariam Ali Abdulmalik1, Jennifer J Ayoub2, Amira Mahmoud3, Lara Nasreddine2, Farah Naja2.
Abstract
Accumulating evidence has highlighted the role of maternal nutritional status on fetal development, birth outcomes and child health. The Mother and Infant Nutritional Assessment (MINA) cohort is a 3-year follow-up study of pregnant women and their children in Qatar and Lebanon. This study reports on the characteristics and determinants of pre-pregnancy BMI and Gestational Weight Gain (GWG) of MINA particiants, as well as birth outcomes. A total of 272 pregnant women were recruited during their first trimester from primary healthcare centers as well as private clinics in Beirut (n = 194) and Doha (n = 147). During the first visit, data collection included pre-pregnancy weight, sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics. The weight before delivery and neonatal outcomes were extracted from the medical records. GWG was calculated as the difference between weight before delivery and pre-pregnancy weight and was classified into insufficient, adequate, and excessive, as per the IOM criteria. Overall, 42.1% of women had a pre-pregnancy BMI≥25 Kg/m2 (58% in Qatar vs 30.8% in Lebanon, p<0.001). Only 30.2% of women had adequate GWG, while 25.7% and 44.1% of women had insufficient and excessive GWG, respectively. In the cohort 68.7% of infants had a weight adequate-for-gestational age (AGA), 6.7% were SGA and 24.6% were LGA. The proportions of LGA were higher with greater GWG (p<0.05). After adjustment, Qatari women were 3 times more likely to be overweight or obese before pregnancy while a higher education level was associated with significantly lower odds of pre-pregnancy BMI≥25 Kg/m2. Pre-pregnancy BMI≥25 Kg/m2 and regular breakfast consumption were predictors of excessive GWG (OR: 3.20, CI: 1.48-6.91; OR: 2.84, CI: 1.15-7.02, respectively). The high prevalence of pre-pregnancy overweight and excessive GWG among MINA participants underscores the need for culture-specific intervention programs to promote healthy body weight in women of childbearing age, and prevent excessive weight gain during pregnancy.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31265481 PMCID: PMC6605672 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219248
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flow chart of the MINA cohort subjects’ recruitment, in Lebanon and Qatar.
Distribution of socio-demographic and lifestyle characteristics of pregnant women enrolled in the MINA*.
| Total (n = 341) | Lebanese (n = 194) | Qatari (n = 147) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.59 | ||||
| 18–24.9 | 77 (22.7) | 42 (21.6) | 35 (24.1) | |
| 25–29.9 | 125 (36.9) | 76 (39.2) | 49 (33.8) | |
| ≥30 | 137 (40.4) | 76 (39.2) | 61 (42.1) | |
| 0 | 123 (38.2) | 78 (44.6) | 45 (30.6) | |
| ≥ 1 | 199 (61.8) | 97 (55.4) | 102 (69.4) | |
| Up to high school | 115 (33.8) | 44 (22.7) | 71(48.6) | |
| University or higher | 225 (66.2) | 150 (77.3) | 75(51.4) | |
| Employee | 156(46.3) | 108 (56.5) | 48 (32.9) | |
| Housewife | 181(53.7) | 83 (43.5) | 98 (67.1) | |
| Yes | 55(16.3) | 18 (9.3) | 37 (25.5) | |
| No | 283(83.7) | 175 (90.7) | 108 (74.5) | |
| Low | 28(14.5) | 24(18.3) | 4(6.5) | |
| Middle | 44(22.8) | 38(29.0) | 6(9.7) | |
| High | 121(62.7) | 69(52.7) | 52(83.9) | |
| | ||||
| Non smoker | 322(94.7) | 176(90.7) | 146(100.0) | |
| Smoker | 18(5.3) | 18(9.3) | 0(0.0) | |
| | ||||
| Non smoker | 330 (97.6) | 186 (95.9) | 144 (100) | |
| Smoker | 8 (2.4) | 8 (4.1) | 0 (0) | |
| | 0.56 | |||
| Not regular | 137(41.1) | 76(39.8) | 61(43.0) | |
| Regular | 196(58.9) | 115(60.2) | 81(57.0) | |
| | ||||
| Not regular | 89(26.8) | 37(19.5) | 52(36.6) | |
| Regular | 243(73.2) | 153(80.5) | 90(63.4) | |
| | ||||
| No | 241(71.9) | 125(65.4) | 116(80.6) | |
| Yes | 94(28.1) | 66(34.6) | 28(19.4) | |
| 0.89 | ||||
| No | 50(15.1) | 28(14.8) | 22(15.4) | |
| Yes | 282(84.9) | 161(85.2) | 121(84.6) | |
| 0.88 | ||||
| Low | 74(32.5) | 51(33.1) | 23(31.1) | |
| Moderate | 76(33.3) | 52(33.8) | 24(32.4) | |
| Vigorous | 78(34.2) | 51(33.1) | 27(36.5) | |
| 33.1±6.0 | 33.5±5.8 | 32.5±6.3 | 0.12 | |
| 0.10 | ||||
| Up to high school | 118 (34.6) | 60 (30.9) | 58 (39.5) | |
| University or higher | 223 (65.4) | 134 (69.1) | 89 (60.5) |
Numbers in bold face are statistically significant (p-value ≤0.05).
*Values in this table represent mean ±SD and n (%) for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.
**p-values were derived from independent t-test and chi-square test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively, comparing Lebanon and Qatar.
⁑ Including technical diploma
Pregnancy characteristics and birth outcomes in the MINA cohort *.
| Total | Lebanon | Qatar | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <25 Kg/m2 | 183(57.9) | 128(69.2) | 55(42.0) | |
| ≥25 Kg/m2 | 133(42.1) | 57(30.8) | 76(58.0) | |
| Insufficient | 52(25.7) | 27(21.3) | 25(33.3) | 0.12 |
| Adequate | 61(30.2) | 43(33.9) | 18(24.0) | |
| Excessive | 89(44.1) | 57(44.9) | 32(42.7) | |
| 38.59±1.59 | 38.39±1.31 | 38.80±1.60 | ||
| 3.23±0.49 | 3.24±0.48 | 3.23±0.51 | 0.87 | |
| 50.15±2.50 | 49.77±2.42 | 50.55±2.53 | ||
| <37 weeks (preterm) | 22 (8.5) | 10 (7.7) | 12 (9.3) | 0.64 |
| ≥37 weeks | 237 (91.5) | 120 (92.3) | 117 (90.7) | |
| 0.75 | ||||
| Low birthweight (<2.5 Kg) | 14(5.5) | 6(4.6) | 8(6.4) | |
| Normal birthweight (2.5–4.0 Kg) | 231(90.2) | 120(91.6) | 111(88.8) | |
| Macrosomia (>4.0 Kg) | 11(4.3) | 5(3.8) | 6(4.8) | |
| 0.08 | ||||
| SGA (< 10th centile) | 17(6.7) | 5(3.9) | 12(9.8) | |
| AGA (10th–90th centile) | 173(68.7) | 87(67.4) | 86(69.9) | |
| LGA (> 90th centile) | 62(24.6) | 37(28.7) | 25(20.3) | |
Abbreviations: BMI: body mass index; GWG: gestational weight gain; SGA: small-for-gestational age; AGA: adequate-for-gestational age; LGA: large-for-gestational age
Numbers in bold face are statistically significant (p-value ≤0.05).
*Values in this table represent mean ±SD and n (%) for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.
**p values were derived from independent t-test and chi-square test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively, comparing Lebanon and Qatar.
Fig 2Distribution (%) of SGA, AGA and LGA birthweights according to the various categories of GWG in the study population.
Simple logistic regression analysis for the association of study characteristics with a pre-pregnancy BMI ≥25 kg/m2 among MINA cohort participants*.
| Pre-pregnancy BMI | ||
|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | p-value | |
| 18–24.9 | Ref. | |
| 25–29.9 | 1.63(0.87–3.05) | 0.13 |
| ≥ 30 | ||
| Lebanese | Ref. | |
| Qatari | ||
| 0 | Ref. | |
| ≥ 1 | ||
| Up to high school | Ref. | |
| University or higher | ||
| Employed | Ref. | |
| Housewife | 0.95(0.63–1.49) | 0.82 |
| No | Ref. | |
| Yes | 1.32(0.71–2.44) | 0.38 |
| Up to high school | Ref. | |
| University or higher | ||
| Low Income | Ref. | |
| Middle Income | 1.10(0.42–2.89) | 0.85 |
| High Income | 0.68(0.29–1.59) | 0.37 |
| Non-smoker | Ref. | |
| Smoker | 0.19(0.02–1.57) | 0.12 |
| Not regularly | Ref. | |
| Regularly | 1.03(0.65–1.63) | 0.91 |
Abbreviations: BMI: body mass index
Numbers in bold face are statistically significant (p-value ≤0.05).
*Values in this table represent OR and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals
**The reference category is pre-pregnancy BMI <25 kg/m2
⁑ Including technical diploma
Simple multinomial logistic regression analysis for the association of participants’ characteristics with GWG among study participants *.
| Gestational Weight Gain (GWG) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insufficient GWG | p-value | Excessive GWG | p-value | |
| 18–24.9 | Ref. | Ref. | ||
| 25–29.9 | 1.64(0.62–4.29) | 0.32 | 2.13(0.91–4.96) | 0.08 |
| ≥30 | 2.21(0.85–5.74) | 0.10 | ||
| Lebanese | Ref. | |||
| Qatari | 1.34(0.67–2.70) | 0.41 | ||
| 0 | Ref. | Ref. | ||
| ≥ 1 | 1.79(0.78–4.07) | 0.17 | 0.77(0.38–1.53) | 0.46 |
| Up to high school | Ref. | Ref. | ||
| University or higher | 0.62(0.28–1.36) | 0.23 | .80(0.39–1.63) | 0.54 |
| Employed | Ref. | Ref. | ||
| Housewife | 1.21(0.57–2.56) | 0.62 | 0.61(0.31–1.18) | 0.14 |
| No | Ref. | Ref. | ||
| Yes | 1.89(0.62–5.74) | 0.26 | 1.65(0.60–4.57) | 0.34 |
| Up to high school | Ref. | Ref. | ||
| University or higher | 0.57(0.26–1.24) | 0.16 | 1.20(0.58–2.48) | 0.62 |
| Low | Ref. | Ref. | ||
| Middle | 0.62(0.12–3.22) | 0.57 | 2.07(0.37–11.53) | 0.41 |
| High | 0.66(0.15–2.80) | 0.57 | 2.06(0.42–10.11) | 0.37 |
| Non-smoker | Ref. | Ref. | ||
| Smoker | 0.57(0.10–3.26) | 0.53 | 0.32(0.06–1.82) | 0.20 |
| <25 Kg/m2 | Ref | Ref | ||
| > = 25 Kg/m2 | 0.53(0.22–1.27) | 0.15 | ||
| Not regularly | Ref. | Ref. | ||
| Regularly | 1.16(0.50–2.69) | 0.74 | ||
| No | Ref. | Ref. | ||
| Yes | 0.93(0.31–2.76) | 0.89 | 1.13(0.42–3.06) | 0.81 |
| Low | Ref | Ref | ||
| Moderate | 0.83(0.30–2.27) | 0.71 | 0.89(0.37–2.16) | 0.80 |
| Vigorous | 1.29(0.48–3.44) | 0.62 | 0.96(0.39–2.37) | 0.92 |
Abbreviations: BMI: body mass index; GWG: gestational weight gain
Numbers in bold face are statistically significant (p-value ≤0.05).
*Values in this table represent OR and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals
**The reference category is “within recommendations”
⁑ Including technical diploma