| Literature DB >> 27271596 |
Mohammed Al Thani1, Al Anoud Al Thani2, Walaa Al-Chetachi3, Badria Al Malki4, Shamseldin A H Khalifa5, Ahmad Haj Bakri6, Nahla Hwalla7, Lara Nasreddine8, Farah Naja9.
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of lifestyle patterns, as a combination of diet, physical activity and smoking, on Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) among Qatari women of childbearing age (n = 418), a population group particularly vulnerable to the health sequela of this syndrome. Using data from the National WHO STEPwise survey conducted in Qatar in 2012, Principal Component Factor Analysis was performed to derive lifestyle patterns with survey variables related to the frequency of consumption of 13 foods/food groups, physical activity levels, and smoking status. MetS was diagnosed using ATPIII criteria. Three lifestyle patterns were identified: 'High Risk' pattern, characterized by intakes of fast foods, sweets and sugar sweetened beverages, in addition to lower levels of physical activity and higher smoking prevalence; 'Prudent' pattern, driven mainly by higher intakes of fruits, vegetables, fish, and whole grains; and 'Traditional' pattern which included beans, meat, dairy products, and a low prevalence of smoking. Among these three lifestyle patterns, only the 'High Risk' was associated with MetS, whereby subjects belonging to the third tertile of this pattern's score had 2.5 times the odds of MetS compared to those belonging to the first tertile. The findings of this study demonstrated the synergy among high risk behaviors among Qatari women in increasing the odds of MetS; the latter being a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases.Entities:
Keywords: factor analysis; lifestyle patterns; metabolic syndrome; nutritional epidemiology; women of childbearing age
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27271596 PMCID: PMC4926323 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17060698
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Prevalence of Metabolic syndrome and its abnormalities in the study sample * (n = 584). The following cut points were used: (1) WC over 88 cm; (2) fasting triglyceride (TG) level over 150 mg/dL (Or on drug treatment for elevated triglycerides); (3) fasting high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level less 50 mg/dL (Or on drug treatment for reduced HDL-C); (4) blood pressure ≥ 130/85 mmHg (or on antihypertensive drug treatment in a patient with a history of hypertension); and (5) fasting blood sugar ≥ 100 mg/dL (or on drug treatment for elevated glucose). MetS was defined by the ATPIII criteria, whereby MetS is present if a woman had three or more of the aforementioned five criteria.
Socio-demographics, lifestyle and anthropometric characteristics of study participants and their association with MetS (n = 418).
| Total | Women without MetS | Women with MetS | OR (95% CI) a | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 30.89 ± 6.96 | 30.50 ± 7.02 | 34.41 ± 5.26 | 1.09 (1.04–1.14) * |
| 18–24 | 72(17.2) | 70(18.6) | 2(4.9) | - |
| 25–34 | 217(51.9) | 197(52.3) | 20(48.8) | 3.37 (0.80-14.15) |
| 35–45 | 129(30.9) | 110(29.2) | 19(46.3) | 5.83 (1.38-24.67) * |
| Education | ||||
| Up to intermediate level | 72(17.3) | 63(16.8) | 9(22.0) | - |
| Finished high school | 154(37.0) | 144(38.4) | 10(24.4) | 0.48 (0.19–1.22) |
| University/graduate level | 190(45.7) | 168(44.8) | 22(53.7) | 0.90 (0.40–2.05) |
| Marital status | ||||
| Not married | 149(35.7) | 140(37.2) | 9(22.0) | - |
| Married | 268(64.3) | 236(62.8) | 32(78.0) | 0.49 (0.23–1.05) |
| Job type | ||||
| Housewife | 125(29.9) | 110(29.3) | 15(35.7) | - |
| Not working | 77(18.4) | 71(18.9) | 6(14.3) | 0.59 (0.21–1.62) |
| Non-governmental employee | 17(4.1) | 15(4.0) | 2(4.8) | 1.09 (0.24–4.90) |
| Governmental employee | 199(47.6) | 180(47.9) | 19(45.2) | 0.78 (0.38–1.61) |
| Parental consanguinity | ||||
| No | 288(68.9) | 259(68.9) | 29(69.0) | - |
| Yes | 130(31.1) | 117(31.1) | 13(31.0) | 0.99 (0.50–1.99) |
| Family history of diabetes | ||||
| No | 124(29.7) | 117(31.1) | 7(16.7) | - |
| Yes | 294(70.3) | 259(68.9) | 35(83.3) | 2.45 (1.03–5.82) * |
| Family history of high blood pressure | ||||
| No | 143(34.2) | 129(34.3) | 14(33.3) | - |
| Yes | 275(65.8) | 247(65.7) | 28(66.7) | 1.05 (0.53–2.07) |
| Number of meals not eaten at home (per week) | 2.48 ± 2.25 | 2.50 ± 2.27 | 2.24±2.10 | 0.95 (0.81–1.10) |
| Smoking status | ||||
| Nonsmoker or past smoker | 408(97.8) | 370(98.4) | 38(92.7) | - |
| Current smoker | 9(2.2) | 6(1.6) | 3(7.3) | 5.46 (1.40–21.25) * |
| Exposure to passive smoking (days/week) | 1.28 ± 3.10 | 1.29 ± 3.14 | 1.19 ± 2.76 | 0.99 (0.89–1.10) |
| Total physical activity (Met-minutes per day) | 420 ± 779 | 415 ± 773 | 466 ± 836 | 1 (1.0–1.0) |
| Physical activity level b | ||||
| Low | 227(54.2) | 207(55.1) | 20(46.5) | - |
| Moderate | 89(21.2) | 78(20.7) | 11(25.6) | 1.42 (0.64–3.13) |
| High | 103(24.6) | 91(24.2) | 12(27.9) | 1.34 (0.62–2.89) |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 29.03 ± 7.52 | 28.29 ± 7.27 | 35.70 ± 6.48 | 1.11 (1.07–1.15) ** |
| Obese(≥30 kg/m2) | 151(36.1) | 116(30.9) | 35(83.3) | 10.97 (4.75–25.33) ** |
a OR(s) are derived from bivariate logistic regression; b The moderate and high levels of physical activity were assigned as per Bauman, A., et al. [18]: Moderate category if a minimum of one of the following three criteria is met: (a) Three days of vigorous activity of at least 20 min per day; (b) 5 days of moderate-intensity activity or walking for more than 30 min per day with each activity lasting for more than 10 min each time; or (c) 5 days of any combination of activities totaling to a minimum of 600 MET-minutes/week; High category if one of the following two criteria is met: (a) Vigorous-intensity activity on more than 3 days/week and totaling to a minimum of 1500 MET-minutes/week; or (b) more than 5 days of any combination of activities achieving a minimum of 3000 MET-minutes/week; Low category if none of the criteria for the Moderate or the High categories apply. * Significant at p < 0.05, ** significant at p < 0.001.
Figure 2Scree plot of the PCFA using the 15 dietary and lifestyle characteristics of women participating in the study (n = 418).
Factor loading matrix of the three identified lifestyle patterns among a nationally representative sample of Qatari women a (n = 418).
| Lifestyle Patterns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| High Risk | Prudent | Traditional | |
| Fast foods | 0.63 | ||
| Sweetened beverages | 0.58 | ||
| Whole grains | −0.51 | 0.30 | |
| Sweets | 0.51 | ||
| Refined grains | 0.49 | −0.22 | 0.33 |
| Poultry | 0.47 | ||
| Physical activity | −0.36 | ||
| Fruits | 0.71 | ||
| Vegetables | 0.65 | ||
| Natural juices | 0.62 | ||
| Fish and sea food | 0.57 | ||
| Beans | 0.70 | ||
| Meats | 0.62 | ||
| Milk and milk products | 0.44 | ||
| Smoking | 0.26 | −0.35 | |
| Percent variance explained | 12.59 | 12.51 | 9.12 |
a Factor loadings of less than 0.2 were not listed in the table for simplicity.
Dietary intake, smoking, and physical activity of study participants by tertiles of scores corresponding to the three identified lifestyle pattern a b (n = 418).
| High Risk Pattern | Prudent Pattern | Traditional Pattern | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Tertile | 3rd Tertile | 1st Tertile | 3rd Tertile | 1st Tertile | 3rd Tertile | |
| Lifestyle characteristics and dietary intake | n(%) or mean ± SD | |||||
| Fast foods (days/week) | 0.67 ± 1.01 | 3.78 ± 2.3 ** | 2.04 ± 2.06 | 2.09 ± 2.18 | 2.09 ± 2.16 | 2.26 ± 2.22 |
| Sweetened beverages (days/week) | 0.76 ± 1.22 | 4.86 ± 2.65 ** | 2.92 ± 2.81 | 1.93 ± 2.4 ** | 2.6 ± 2.96 | 2.72 ± 2.73 |
| Whole grains(days/week) | 3.51 ± 2.96 | 0.65 ± 1.39 ** | 1.17 ± 2.2 | 2.75 ± 2.82 ** | 2.08 ± 2.73 | 1.6 ± 2.38 |
| Sweets (days/week) | 2.5 ± 2.21 | 5.66 ± 2.07 ** | 3.98 ± 2.67 | 4.16 ± 2.59 | 4.32 ± 2.65 | 4.34 ± 2.57 |
| Refined grains (days/week) | 3.59 ± 2.71 | 6.41 ± 1.43 ** | 5.88 ± 2.05 | 4.56 ± 2.62 ** | 3.92 ± 2.73 | 6.12 ± 1.79 ** |
| Poultry (days/week) | 3.81 ± 2.06 | 5.8 ± 1.74 ** | 5.36 ± 2.07 | 4.7 ± 1.99 * | 5.15 ± 2.18 | 5.33 ± 1.9 |
| Total physical activity (Met-minutes per day) | 558 ± 1063 | 323 ± 558* | 455 ± 780 | 393 ± 639 | 566 ± 953 | 480 ± 729 * |
| Fruits (days/week) | 3.74 ± 2.77 | 2.56 ± 2.49 ** | 1.01 ± 1.19 | 5.2 ± 2.23 ** | 2.43 ± 2.51 | 3.58 ± 2.57 ** |
| Vegetables (days/week) | 5.46 ± 2.38 | 5.06 ± 2.55 | 3.26 ± 2.52 | 6.79 ± 0.89 ** | 5.15 ± 2.51 | 5.26 ± 2.58 |
| Natural juices (days/week) | 3.83 ± 2.64 | 3.51 ± 2.56 | 1.83 ± 1.97 | 5.57 ± 2.19 ** | 3.31 ± 2.78 | 4.1 ± 2.72 * |
| Fish and sea food(days/week) | 1.86 ± 1.5 | 1.3 ± 1.12 * | 0.83 ± 0.71 | 2.41 ± 1.56 ** | 1.78 ± 1.63 | 1.44 ± 1.23 * |
| Beans (days/week) | 1.55 ± 1.49 | 1.79 ± 1.79 | 1.42 ± 1.68 | 2.06 ± 1.67 * | 0.67 ± 0.84 | 2.89 ± 2.04 ** |
| Meats (days/week) | 1.49 ± 1.38 | 2.03 ± 1.74 * | 1.88 ± 1.87 | 1.81 ± 1.36 | 0.88 ± 0.89 | 3.04 ± 1.91 ** |
| Milk and milk products(days/week) | 5.82 ± 2.01 | 5.9 ± 2.07 | 5.85 ± 2.18 | 5.93 ± 1.98 | 4.86 ± 2.63 | 6.53 ± 1.32 ** |
| Smoking | ||||||
| Nonsmoker or past smoker | 131(100) | 144(94.7) * | 130(97.0) | 149(98.7) | 127(92.7) | 155(100) ** |
| Current smoker | 0(0.0) | 8(5.3) | 4(3.0) | 2(1.3) | 10(7.3) | 0(0.0) |
* p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.001, a Intake of the various food groups referred to frequency of consumption as expressed by number of days per week the food/food group was consumed; b Significance was derived from ANOVA test for continuous variables and chi square test for categorical variables.
Odds of the metabolic abnormalities and MetS across tertiles of factor scores assessed by multivariate logistic regression a in the study population (n = 418).
| Elevated WC b | Hyper Triglyceridemia c | Low HDL-C d | Elevated Blood Pressure e | Hyperglycemia f | MetS g | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lifestyle Patterns | ||||||
| 1st tertile | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2nd tertile | 0.99 (0.58–1.69) | 0.71 (0.33–1.55) | 1.30 (0.77–2.20) | 0.91 (0.40–2.07) | 1.59 (0.75–3.38) | 1.06 (0.41–2.75) |
| 3rd tertile | 0.94 (0.55–1.63) | 0.68 (0.30–1.54) | 1.19 (0.70–2.04) | 1.96 (1.02–4.70) | 1.72 (0.80–3.68) | 2.47 (1.04–5.39) |
| 1st tertile | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2nd tertile | 1.52 (0.89–2.67) | 0.89 (0.39–2.05) | 0.99 (0.59–1.67) | 1.72 (0.784–3.806) | 0.61 (0.28–1.32) | 1.69 (0.65–4.39) |
| 3rd tertile | 1.03 (0.60–1.77) | 0.81 (0.36–1.81) | 0.75 (0.44–1.27) | 1.33 (0.596–2.989) | 1.08 (0.53–2.19) | 2.05 (0.81–5.15) |
| 1st tertile | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2nd tertile | 0.80 (0.47–1.37) | 1.55 (0.71–3.41) | 0.89 (0.52–1.52) | 1.35 (0.62–2.92) | 1.64 (0.81–3.34) | 1.16 (0.49–2.73) |
| 3rd tertile | 1.45 (0.85–2.46) | 0.84 (0.37–1.91) | 1.67 (0.97–2.68) | 1.51 (0.71–3.21) | 1.11 (0.52–2.36) | 1.13 (0.49–2.63) |
a Values presented in the table are OR and 95% CI. ORs were adjusted for age, education, marital status, job type, parental consanguinity, family history of diabetes, family history of high blood pressure, passive smoking, number of meals not eaten at home; b Elevated Waist circumference (≥88 cm); c High Fasting Triglycerides: ≥150 mg/dL; d Low HDL(<50 mg/dL); e High Blood Pressure: SBP ≥ 130 mmhg or DBP ≥ 85 mmhg; f hyperglycemia:fasting blood glucose ≥100 mg/dL; g MetS was diagnosed if a woman had three or more of the following five criteria: WC over 88 cm, blood pressure ≥ 130/85 mmHg (or on antihypertensive drug treatment in a patient with a history of hypertension), fasting triglyceride (TG) level over 150 mg/dL (Or on drug treatment for elevated triglycerides), fasting high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level less 50 mg/dL (Or on drug treatment for reduced HDL-C) and fasting blood sugar ≥100 mg/dL (or on drug treatment for elevated glucose) [19].