Literature DB >> 7598451

Minimally invasive surgery.

M Vierra1.   

Abstract

With the widespread introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in late 1989, the practice and expectations of general surgery were changed forever. The techniques of laparoscopy were not new--they had been adopted by gynecologists and orthopedic surgeons at least a decade before--but it was laparoscopic cholecystectomy that captured the attention of the surgical profession and the public and spawned the tremendous growth in what has come to be called minimally invasive surgery. Although this surgery has tremendous appeal, offering quicker recovery, less pain, and possibly greater safety, it presents new challenges in the areas of training, credentialing, and quality assessment and raises serious questions about the real benefits of new technology at a time when the political and economic sensitivity of these issues is greater than ever. In this chapter I limit myself to a discussion of laparoscopy in general surgery, with a focus on what we have learned from laparoscopic cholecystectomy and on what this knowledge suggests for the future of other laparoscopic general surgical procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7598451     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.med.46.1.147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Med        ISSN: 0066-4219            Impact factor:   13.739


  7 in total

Review 1.  Possibilities and limitations of current stereo-endoscopy.

Authors:  U D A Mueller-Richter; A Limberger; P Weber; K W Ruprecht; W Spitzer; M Schilling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria.

Authors:  S Nahum Goldberg; Clement J Grassi; John F Cardella; J William Charboneau; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra Gervais; Alice R Gillams; Robert A Kane; Fred T Lee; Tito Livraghi; John McGahan; David A Phillips; Hyunchul Rhim; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Clinical validation of percutaneous cochlear implant surgery: initial report.

Authors:  Robert Frederick Labadie; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Ramya Balachandran; Omid Majdani; J Michael Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 4.  Adrenal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a step too far?

Authors:  Hrishikesh Salgaonkar; Rajeev Parameswaran
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-07

5.  Inclusion of a nitric oxide congener in the insufflation gas repletes S-nitrosohemoglobin and stabilizes physiologic status during prolonged carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  Kazufumi Shimazutsu; Kenichiro Uemura; Kathryn M Auten; Matthew F Baldwin; Samuel W Belknap; Francisco La Banca; Maximilian C Jones; Deborah J McClaine; Rebecca J McClaine; W Steve Eubanks; Jonathan S Stamler; James D Reynolds
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.689

6.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: the evolution and technique of minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Toshitaka Hoppo; Blair A Jobe; John G Hunter
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Laparoscopic gastric tube formation with pyloromyotomy for reconstruction in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jin Won Lee; Sook Whan Sung; Jae Kil Park; Cho Hyun Park; Kyo Young Song
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 1.859

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.