Literature DB >> 27538937

[Characteristics, advantages, and limits of matrix tests].

T Brand1,2, K C Wagener3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deterioration of communication abilities due to hearing problems is particularly relevant in listening situations with noise. Therefore, speech intelligibility tests in noise are required for audiological diagnostics and evaluation of hearing rehabilitation.
OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed the characteristics of matrix tests assessing the 50 % speech recognition threshold in noise. What are their advantages and limitations?
METHODS: Matrix tests are based on a matrix of 50 words (10 five-word sentences with same grammatical structure). In the standard setting, 20 sentences are presented using an adaptive procedure estimating the individual 50 % speech recognition threshold in noise. At present, matrix tests in 17 different languages are available.
RESULTS: A high international comparability of matrix tests exists. The German language matrix test (OLSA, male speaker) has a reference 50 % speech recognition threshold of -7.1 (± 1.1) dB SNR.
CONCLUSION: Before using a matrix test for the first time, the test person has to become familiar with the basic speech material using two training lists. Hereafter, matrix tests produce constant results even if repeated many times. Matrix tests are suitable for users of hearing aids and cochlear implants, particularly for assessment of benefit during the fitting process. Matrix tests can be performed in closed form and consequently with non-native listeners, even if the experimenter does not speak the test person's native language. Short versions of matrix tests are available for listeners with a shorter memory span, e.g., children.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Cochlear implant; Hearing loss; Rehabilitation; Speech intelligibility tests

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27538937     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-016-0224-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  18 in total

1.  [Speech audiometry and new word-tests].

Authors:  K H HAHLBROCK
Journal:  Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd       Date:  1953

2.  A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise.

Authors:  Sabine Hochmuth; Thomas Brand; Melanie A Zokoll; Franz Zenker Castro; Nina Wardenga; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.

Authors:  Giuseppina Emma Puglisi; Anna Warzybok; Sabine Hochmuth; Chiara Visentin; Arianna Astolfi; Nicola Prodi; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Learning effect when using the Danish Hagerman sentences (Dantale II) to determine speech reception threshold.

Authors:  Lotte Hagen Hernvig; Steen Ostergaard Olsen
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Speech-in-noise tests for multilingual hearing screening and diagnostics1.

Authors:  Melanie A Zokoll; Sabine Hochmuth; Anna Warzybok; Kirsten C Wagener; Michael Buschermöhle; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.493

6.  Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment.

Authors:  B Kollmeier; M Wesselkamp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology (ICRA) recommendations for the construction of multilingual speech tests. ICRA Working Group on Multilingual Speech Tests.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd; Stig Arlinger; Ruth A Bentler; Arthur Boothroyd; Norbert Dillier; Wouter A Dreschler; Jean-Pierre Gagné; Mark Lutman; Jan Wouters; Lena Wong; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.

Authors:  Anna Warzybok; Melanie Zokoll; Nina Wardenga; Edward Ozimek; Maria Boboshko; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  [Indication for and verification of hearing aid benefit using modern methods of speech audiometry in German].

Authors:  B Kollmeier; T Lenarz; A Winkler; M A Zokoll; H Sukowski; T Brand; K C Wagener
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  Sentence intelligibility in noise for listeners with normal hearing and hearing impairment: influence of measurement procedure and masking parameters.

Authors:  Kirsten Carola Wagener; Thomas Brand
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  4 in total

1.  The CAPOS mutation in ATP1A3 alters Na/K-ATPase function and results in auditory neuropathy which has implications for management.

Authors:  Lisbeth Tranebjærg; Nicola Strenzke; Sture Lindholm; Nanna D Rendtorff; Hanne Poulsen; Himanshu Khandelia; Wojciech Kopec; Troels J Brünnich Lyngbye; Christian Hamel; Cecile Delettre; Beatrice Bocquet; Michael Bille; Hanne H Owen; Toke Bek; Hanne Jensen; Karen Østergaard; Claes Möller; Linda Luxon; Lucinda Carr; Louise Wilson; Kaukab Rajput; Tony Sirimanna; Katherine Harrop-Griffiths; Shamima Rahman; Barbara Vona; Julia Doll; Thomas Haaf; Oliver Bartsch; Hendrik Rosewich; Tobias Moser; Maria Bitner-Glindzicz
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Current audiological diagnostics.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth; Izet Baljić
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

3.  Speech Audiometry at Home: Automated Listening Tests via Smart Speakers With Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Jasper Ooster; Melanie Krueger; Jörg-Hendrik Bach; Kirsten C Wagener; Birger Kollmeier; Bernd T Meyer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 4.  Duration of deafness impacts auditory performance after cochlear implantation: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikolai Bernhard; Ulrich Gauger; Eugenia Romo Ventura; Florian C Uecker; Heidi Olze; Steffen Knopke; Toni Hänsel; Annekatrin Coordes
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.