Literature DB >> 34071662

Improvements in Hearing and in Quality of Life after Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in a Consecutive Sample of Adult Patients with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Ville Sivonen1, Saku T Sinkkonen1, Tytti Willberg2,3, Satu Lamminmäki1, Hilkka Jääskelä-Saari1, Antti A Aarnisalo1, Aarno Dietz4.   

Abstract

Bilateral cochlear implantation is increasing worldwide. In adults, bilateral cochlear implants (BICI) are often performed sequentially with a time delay between the first (CI1) and the second (CI2) implant. The benefits of BICI have been reported for well over a decade. This study aimed at investigating these benefits for a consecutive sample of adult patients. Improvements in speech-in-noise recognition after CI2 were followed up longitudinally for 12 months with the internationally comparable Finnish matrix sentence test. The test scores were statistically significantly better for BICI than for either CI alone in all assessments during the 12-month period. At the end of the follow-up period, the bilateral benefit for co-located speech and noise was 1.4 dB over CI1 and 1.7 dB over CI2, and when the noise was moved from the front to 90 degrees on the side, spatial release from masking amounted to an improvement of 2.5 dB in signal-to-noise ratio. To assess subjective improvements in hearing and in quality of life, two questionnaires were used. Both questionnaires revealed statistically significant improvements due to CI2 and BICI. The association between speech recognition in noise and background factors (duration of hearing loss/deafness, time between implants) or subjective improvements was markedly smaller than what has been previously reported on sequential BICI in adults. Despite the relatively heterogeneous sample, BICI improved hearing and quality of life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adult patients; bilateral; cochlear implant; consecutive sample; correlation; etiology of hearing loss; sequential; speech recognition in noise; subjective improvement

Year:  2021        PMID: 34071662     DOI: 10.3390/jcm10112394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  27 in total

1.  Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant.

Authors:  P Schleich; P Nopp; P D'Haese
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Characteristics and international comparability of the Finnish matrix sentence test in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Aarno Dietz; Michael Buschermöhle; Ville Sivonen; Tytti Willberg; Antti A Aarnisalo; Thomas Lenarz; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 3.  Soft cochlear implantation: rationale for the surgical approach.

Authors:  David R Friedland; Christina Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

Review 4.  A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bilateral multichannel cochlear implants in adults with severe-to-profound hearing loss.

Authors:  L Crathorne; M Bond; C Cooper; J Elston; G Weiner; R Taylor; K Stein
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.597

Review 5.  The effectiveness of bilateral cochlear implants for severe-to-profound deafness in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jelmer van Schoonhoven; Marloes Sparreboom; Bert G A van Zanten; Rob J P M Scholten; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Wouter A Dreschler; Wilko Grolman; Bert Maat
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  The long-term learning effect related to the repeated use of the Finnish matrix sentence test and the Finnish digit triplet test.

Authors:  Tytti Willberg; Ville Sivonen; Saija Hurme; Antti A Aarnisalo; Heikki Löppönen; Aarno Dietz
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL): Development of a Profile Instrument (CIQOL-35 Profile) and a Global Measure (CIQOL-10 Global).

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Craig A Velozo; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.

Authors:  Roman D Laske; Dorothe Veraguth; Norbert Dillier; Andrea Binkert; David Holzmann; Alexander M Huber
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Cost-Utility of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Yvette E Smulders; Alice van Zon; Inge Stegeman; Gijsbert A van Zanten; Albert B Rinia; Robert J Stokroos; Rolien H Free; Bert Maat; Johan H M Frijns; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Wendy J Huinck; Vedat Topsakal; Wilko Grolman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Geerte G J Ramakers; Yvette E Smulders; Alice van Zon; Gijsbert A Van Zanten; Wilko Grolman; Inge Stegeman
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2017-11-28
View more
  1 in total

1.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire into Turkish language: validity, reliability and effects of demographic variables.

Authors:  Asuman Alnıaçık; Eda Çakmak; Okan Öz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.236

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.