Literature DB >> 31579532

Management of Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Use of a Stepped, Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeve.

Marc R Angerame1, Jason M Jennings2,3, David C Holst4, Douglas A Dennis2,3,5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Revision total knee arthroplasty is a costly operation associated with many challenges including bone loss in the distal end of the femur and proximal end of the tibia1,2. Reconstruction of bone defects remains a difficult problem that may require more extensive reconstruction techniques to restore mechanical stability and ensure long-term fixation. Use of porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves is a modern technique to address bone deficiency in revision total knee arthroplasty3,4. Midterm reports have shown excellent survivorship and osseointegration5-7. DESCRIPTION: The use of a porous-coated metaphyseal sleeve begins with intramedullary canal reaming to determine the diameter of the diaphyseal-engaging stem. Bone loss is assessed followed by broaching of the tibial and/or femoral metaphyses. Broaching continues until axial and rotational stability are achieved. The sleeve typically occupies most, if not all, of the proximal tibial and distal femoral cavitary osseous defects often encountered during revision total knee arthroplasty. However, a sleeve does not address all distal and posterior femoral condylar bone loss, for which augments are often required. ALTERNATIVES: Previously described methods to address various bone deficiencies include use of morselized or structural bone-grafting, reinforcing screws within cement, metal augments, and metaphyseal cone fixation8-17. RATIONALE: Structural allografts or metal augments remain a suitable option for uncontained metaphyseal defects. Metaphyseal structural allografts may undergo stress-shielding, resorption, and late fracture. Metaphyseal sleeves offer long-term biologic fixation to host bone while creating a stable platform to receive a cemented femoral and/or tibial component7. This hybrid combination may provide mechanically protective properties to decrease the loads at the cement-bone interfaces and enhance loads to metaphyseal bone to ensure long-term implant fixation in the setting of substantial bone deficiencies18-20.
Copyright © 2019 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31579532      PMCID: PMC6687494          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech        ISSN: 2160-2204


  22 in total

1.  Impaction grafting for bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul A Lotke; Gregory F Carolan; Neil Puri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Why do revision knee arthroplasties fail?

Authors:  Juan Suarez; William Griffin; Bryan Springer; Thomas Fehring; J Bohannon Mason; Susan Odum
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Tantalum cones and bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  F Boureau; S Putman; A Arnould; G Dereudre; H Migaud; G Pasquier
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.256

4.  No Difference Between Trabecular Metal Cones and Femoral Head Allografts in Revision TKA: Minimum 5-year Followup.

Authors:  Nemandra A Sandiford; Peter Misur; Donald S Garbuz; Nelson V Greidanus; Bassam A Masri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeves for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Loss in Revision TKA.

Authors:  Tyler S Watters; John R Martin; Daniel L Levy; Charlie C Yang; Raymond H Kim; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Catastrophic Varus Collapse of the Tibia in Obese Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas K Fehring; Keith A Fehring; Lucas A Anderson; Jesse E Otero; Bryan D Springer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  The use of metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  David F Dalury; William P Barrett
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Underestimation of osteolysis in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew C Nadaud; Thomas K Fehring; Keith Fehring
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Distribution of bone strength in the proximal tibia.

Authors:  Y Harada; H W Wevers; T D Cooke
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Use of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty in knees with severe tibial bone loss.

Authors:  Gerard A Engh; Deborah J Ammeen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  6 in total

1.  Novel metaphyseal porous titanium cones allow favorable outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ittai Shichman; Christian Oakley; Jore H Willems; Gijs G van Hellemondt; Petra Heesterbeek; Joshua Rozell; Scott Marwin; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Early Survivorship of Newly Designed Highly Porous Metaphyseal Tibial Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian P Chalmers; Christina M Malfer; David J Mayman; Geoffrey H Westrich; Peter K Sculco; Mathias P Bostrom; Seth A Jerabek
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-02-23

3.  Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves used in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ron Gurel; Samuel Morgan; Etay Elbaz; Itay Ashlenazi; Nimrod Snir; Assaf Kadar; Aviram Gold; Yaniv Warschawski
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-04

4.  Conversion From Knee Arthrodesis Back to Arthroplasty: A Particular Challenge in Combination With Fungal Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Sven Frieler; Emre Yilmaz; Ryan Goodmanson; Yannik Hanusrichter; Thomas A Schildhauer; Hinnerk Baecker
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-12-05

5.  Porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves and MBT implant for severe bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: a mean 2.4-year follow-up.

Authors:  Yushun Wu; Eryou Feng; Yiyuan Zhang; Feitai Lin; Liqiong Lin; Zhanglai Li; Lili Xiao
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-04-20

6.  Metaphyseal sleeves in arthroplasty of the knee : A suitable tool in management of major metaphyseal bone loss.

Authors:  Christian Lycke; Dirk Zajonz; Alexander Brand; Torsten Prietzel; Christoph-E Heyde; Andreas Roth; Mohamed Ghanem
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 1.087

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.