Jarlath Christopher Bolger1, Michael Eamon Kelly2, Kevin Barry2,3. 1. Department of Surgery, Mayo General Hospital, Saolta University Hospital Group, Castlebar, Co Mayo, Ireland. jarbolger@rcsi.ie. 2. Department of Surgery, Mayo General Hospital, Saolta University Hospital Group, Castlebar, Co Mayo, Ireland. 3. Discipline of Surgery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Acute appendicitis represents the commonest cause of acute intra-abdominal pathology. Appendectomy and antibiotics are the mainstay of therapy for appendicitis. Evidence is emerging that antibiotics alone may adequately treat most cases of appendicitis. Decision analysis is a quantitative method of examining alternate treatment strategies. This study describes a modelled decision analysis comparing operative and conservative management of appendicitis. METHODS: The base case patient is a healthy, 23-year-old male presenting with migratory pain to the right iliac fossa (RIF) and elevated inflammatory markers. A decision tree was constructed comparing operative and conservative treatment. Rates of complications, failure of conservative therapy, recurrence and utilities were calculated via a systematic literature review. Variables were tested for sensitivity. RESULTS: Overall, conservative management gives a significantly better outcome (51.51 vs 49.87 QALYs). Three variables proved sensitive. Once operative complication rates are lower than 11.5 %, surgical treatment becomes the optimal strategy. If rates of failure of conservative management exceed 12.9 %, surgery becomes optimal. If the utility assigned to a post-operative complication exceeds 0.44, surgery becomes optimal. CONCLUSIONS: This decision analysis supports a conservative strategy, albeit with caveats. If operative complications are low or rates of failure of conservative management remain high, surgery is the preferable strategy.
INTRODUCTION: Acute appendicitis represents the commonest cause of acute intra-abdominal pathology. Appendectomy and antibiotics are the mainstay of therapy for appendicitis. Evidence is emerging that antibiotics alone may adequately treat most cases of appendicitis. Decision analysis is a quantitative method of examining alternate treatment strategies. This study describes a modelled decision analysis comparing operative and conservative management of appendicitis. METHODS: The base case patient is a healthy, 23-year-old male presenting with migratory pain to the right iliac fossa (RIF) and elevated inflammatory markers. A decision tree was constructed comparing operative and conservative treatment. Rates of complications, failure of conservative therapy, recurrence and utilities were calculated via a systematic literature review. Variables were tested for sensitivity. RESULTS: Overall, conservative management gives a significantly better outcome (51.51 vs 49.87 QALYs). Three variables proved sensitive. Once operative complication rates are lower than 11.5 %, surgical treatment becomes the optimal strategy. If rates of failure of conservative management exceed 12.9 %, surgery becomes optimal. If the utility assigned to a post-operative complication exceeds 0.44, surgery becomes optimal. CONCLUSIONS: This decision analysis supports a conservative strategy, albeit with caveats. If operative complications are low or rates of failure of conservative management remain high, surgery is the preferable strategy.
Authors: Johan Styrud; Staffan Eriksson; Ingemar Nilsson; Gunnar Ahlberg; Staffan Haapaniemi; Gunnar Neovius; Lars Rex; Ibrahim Badume; Lars Granström Journal: World J Surg Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Lindsay A Bliss; Catherine J Yang; Tara S Kent; Sing Chau Ng; Jonathan F Critchlow; Jennifer F Tseng Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-10-08 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Conor Brosnan; Jarlath C Bolger; Eamonn M Bolger; Michael E Kelly; Roisin Tully; Mohamed AlAzzawi; William B Robb Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-08-21 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Joachim Wilfried Heise; Heiner Kentrup; Christoph Gerhart Dietrich; Ansgar Cosler; Dolores Hübner; Werner Krumholz Journal: Visc Med Date: 2020-10-05