Literature DB >> 25294554

Appendicitis in the modern era: universal problem and variable treatment.

Lindsay A Bliss1, Catherine J Yang, Tara S Kent, Sing Chau Ng, Jonathan F Critchlow, Jennifer F Tseng.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is the second most common gastrointestinal diagnosis mandating urgent operation in the U.S. The current state of adult appendectomy, including patient and hospital characteristics, complications, and predictors for complications, are unknown.
METHODS: Retrospective review of U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2003-2011 for appendectomy in ≥18-year-olds was performed. Primary outcomes measures included postoperative complications, length of stay, and patient mortality. Categorical variables were analyzed by χ2, trend analyses by Cochran-Armitage. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for predictors of developing complications.
RESULTS: 1,663,238 weighted appendectomy discharges occurred. Over the study period, complications increased from 3.2 to 3.8% (p < 0.0001), but the overall mortality decreased from 0.14 to 0.09% (p < 0.0001) and mean LOS decreased from 3.1 to 2.6 days (p < 0.0001). The proportion of laparoscopic appendectomy increased over time, 41.7-80.1% (p < 0.0001). Patients were increasingly older (≥65 years: 9.4-11.6%, p < 0.0001), more obese (3.8-8.9%, p < 0.0001), and with more comorbidities (Elixhauser score ≥3: 4.7-9.8%, p < 0.0001). After adjustment, independent predictors for postoperative complications included: open surgery (OR 1.5, 95% C.I. 1.4-1.5), male sex (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.5-1.6), black race (vs. white: OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.4-1.6), perforated appendix (OR 2.8, 95% CI 2.7-3.0), greater comorbidity (Elixhauser ≥3 vs. 0, OR 11.3, 95% CI 10.5-12.1), non-private insurance status (vs. private: Medicaid OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.4; Medicare OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.6-1.8), increasing age (>52 years vs. ≤27: OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.2-1.4), and hospital volume (vs. high: low OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.3). Predictors of laparoscopic appendectomy were age, ethnicity, insurance status, comorbidities, and hospital location.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic appendectomy is increasing but is unevenly deployed across patient groups. Appendectomy patients were increasingly older, with more comorbidities and with increasing rates of obesity. Black patients and patients with public insurance had less utilization of laparoscopy and inferior outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25294554     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3882-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  14 in total

1.  Identification of in-hospital complications from claims data. Is it valid?

Authors:  A G Lawthers; E P McCarthy; R B Davis; L E Peterson; R H Palmer; L I Iezzoni
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Disparities in access to basic laparoscopic surgery at U.S. academic medical centers.

Authors:  J Esteban Varela; Ninh T Nguyen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Nationwide trends of severe sepsis in the 21st century (2000-2007).

Authors:  Gagan Kumar; Nilay Kumar; Amit Taneja; Thomas Kaleekal; Sergey Tarima; Emily McGinley; Edgar Jimenez; Anand Mohan; Rumi Ahmed Khan; Jeff Whittle; Elizabeth Jacobs; Rahul Nanchal
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Thirty-day outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in elderly using ACS/NSQIP database.

Authors:  Ashkan Moazzez; Rodney J Mason; Namir Katkhouda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Patient selection and the volume effect in pancreatic surgery: unequal benefits?

Authors:  Lindsay A Bliss; Catherine J Yang; Zeling Chau; Sing Chau Ng; David W McFadden; Tara S Kent; A James Moser; Mark P Callery; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Racial disparities in outcomes after appendectomy for acute appendicitis.

Authors:  John E Scarborough; Kyla M Bennett; Theodore N Pappas
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in older patients.

Authors:  Eleanor Southgate; Nicola Vousden; Alan Karthikesalingam; Sheraz R Markar; Stephen Black; Ahsan Zaidi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-06

9.  Emergency appendicectomy in the era of laparoscopy: a one-year audit.

Authors:  Z Al Hilli; R S Prichard; G Roche-Nagle; M Leader; D A McNamara; J Deasy
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Intra-abdominal collections following laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: an experience of 516 consecutive cases at a district general hospital.

Authors:  Daniel G G Wilson; Amanda K Bond; Nikhil Ladwa; Muhammad S Sajid; Mirza K Baig; Parvinderpal Sains
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  9 in total

1.  Robotic approaches may offer benefit in colorectal procedures, more controversial in other areas: a review of 168,248 cases.

Authors:  Maria S Altieri; Jie Yang; Dana A Telem; Jiawen Zhu; Caitlin Halbert; Mark Talamini; Aurora D Pryor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Severe Complications of Laparoscopic and Conventional Appendectomy Reported to the Finnish Patient Insurance Centre.

Authors:  Sannamari Kotaluoto; Satu-Liisa K Pauniaho; Mika T Helminen; Juhani A Sand; Tuomo K Rantanen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Antibiotics-First Versus Surgery for Appendicitis: A US Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Allowing Outpatient Antibiotic Management.

Authors:  David A Talan; Darin J Saltzman; William R Mower; Anusha Krishnadasan; Cecilia M Jude; Ricky Amii; Daniel A DeUgarte; James X Wu; Kavitha Pathmarajah; Ashkan Morim; Gregory J Moran
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2016-12-11       Impact factor: 5.721

4.  Managing acute cholecystitis among Medicaid insured in New York State: opportunities to optimize care.

Authors:  Anne M Stey; Alexander J Greenstein; Arthur Aufses; Alan J Moskowitz; Natalia N Egorova
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Imaging in acute appendicitis: What, when, and why?

Authors:  Jyotindu Debnath; R A George; R Ravikumar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2016-03-29

6.  Long-term follow-up after single-incision laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Atakan Görkem Barutcu; Denis Klein; Maik Kilian; Matthias Biebl; Roland Raakow; Johann Pratschke; Jonas Raakow
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Acute Appendicitis in the Adult Population: Modelled Decision Analysis Supports a Conservative Approach.

Authors:  Jarlath Christopher Bolger; Michael Eamon Kelly; Kevin Barry
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF C-REACTIVE PROTEIN AND THE INFLUENCE OF VISCERAL FAT IN PATIENTS WITH OBESITY AND ACUTE APPENDICITIS.

Authors:  Adham do Amaral E Castro; Thelma Larocca Skare; Fernando Ide Yamauchi; Adriano Tachibana; Suheyla Pollyana Pereira Ribeiro; Eduardo Kaiser Ururahy Nunes Fonseca; Andressa Tamy Sakuma; Milena Rocha Peixoto; Mariana Athaniel Silva Rodrigues; Maria Angela M Barreiros
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2018-03-01

9.  Plasma calprotectin level: usage in distinction of uncomplicated from complicated acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Murat Cikot; Kivanc Derya Peker; Mehmet Abdussamet Bozkurt; Ali Kocatas; Osman Kones; Sinan Binboga; Asuman Gedikbasi; Halil Alis
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.469

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.