Literature DB >> 26357797

A 2013 Survey on Pressure Monitoring in Adult Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits: Modes and Applications.

Laura Rigg, Bruce Searles, Edward Morse Darling.   

Abstract

Pressure data acquired from multiple sites of extracorporeal circuits can be an important parameter to monitor for the safe conduct of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Although previous surveys demonstrate that CPB circuit pressure monitoring is widely used, there are very little data cataloging specific applications of this practice. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to survey the perfusion community to catalog 1) primary CPB circuit site pressure monitoring locations; 2) type of manometers used; 3) pressure monitoring interface and servoregulation with pump console; and 4) the rationale and documentation associated with pressure monitoring during CPB. In June 2013, a validated 27-question online survey was sent directly through an e-mail link to the chief perfusionists in the northeast United States. Completed surveys were received from 75 of 117 surveys deployed yielding a 64% response rate. Arterial line pressure monitoring during CPB is reported by 99% with six distinct circuit site locations identified. Cardioplegia system pressure was monitored by 95% of the centers. For vacuum-assisted venous drainage (VAVD) users, the venous pressure was measured by 72% of the responding centers. Arterial line pressure servoregulation of the arterial pump was indicated by 61% of respondents and 75% of centers record arterial line pressure in their perfusion record. Most centers (77%) report the use of a transducer that is integrated into the pump console providing a digital pressure display, whereas 20% combine an aneroid gauge manometer with the integrated digital transducer. This study demonstrates that the practice of arterial line pressure monitoring during CPB is nearly universal. However, the selection of the pressure monitoring site on the circuit, modes of monitoring pressure, and their applications are highly variable across the perfusion community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 26357797      PMCID: PMC4557472     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol        ISSN: 0022-1058


  6 in total

1.  A retrospective study on perfusion incidents and safety devices.

Authors:  B L Mejak; A Stammers; E Rauch; S Vang; T Viessman
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Richard E. Clark Award. Aortic dissection as a complication of cardiac surgery: report from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database.

Authors:  Matthew L Williams; Shubin Sheng; James S Gammie; J Scott Rankin; Peter K Smith; G Chad Hughes
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Dutch perfusion incident survey.

Authors:  Ingrid Groenenberg; Patrick W Weerwind; Peter A M Everts; Jos G Maessen
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Australasian perfusion incident survey.

Authors:  O F Jenkins; R Morris; J M Simpson
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  International pediatric perfusion practice: 2011 survey results.

Authors:  Brian Harvey; Kenneth G Shann; David Fitzgerald; Brian Mejak; Donald S Likosky; Luc Puis; Robert A Baker; Robert C Groom
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2012-12

6.  Australian and New Zealand perfusion survey: management and procedure.

Authors:  Sigrid C Tuble; Timothy W Willcox; Robert A Baker
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2009-06
  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Unexplained Obstruction of an Integrated Cardiotomy Filter During Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

Authors:  Cory M Alwardt; Donald S Wilson; Octavio E Pajaro
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2017-03

2.  Coronary Perfusion Pressure during Antegrade Cardioplegia in On-Pump CABG Patients.

Authors:  Jackson Brandão Lopes; Carlos Cezar Monteiro Dos Santos
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017 May-Jun
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.