Literature DB >> 19681302

Australian and New Zealand perfusion survey: management and procedure.

Sigrid C Tuble1, Timothy W Willcox, Robert A Baker.   

Abstract

In this report, we will discuss management and procedural aspects of perfusion practice. This report allows us to compare and contrast recent trends and changes in perfusion with historic practices. A survey comprised of 233 single-answer and 12 open-ended questions was sent by e-mail to senior perfusionists or individuals in charge of perfusion in 40 hospital groups. The survey encompasses a review of the perfusion practices for the calendar year of 2003, and respondents were required to answer the survey based on the predominant practice in their institutions. Standard management of routine adult cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in 2003 consisted of perfusion strategies that achieved a target temperature of 32.0 degrees C (range, 28.0-35.0 degrees C), a flow index of 2.4 L/min/m2 (range, 1.6-3.0 L/min/m2) during normothermia and 1.8 L/min/m2 (range, 1.2-3.0 L/min/m2) during hypothermia, and a pressure during CPB between 50 (range, 30-65 mmHg) and 70 mmHg (range, 60-95 mmHg). Myocardial protection with blood cardioplegia was used in 77% of the 20,688 CPB cases, whereas in 53% cases, cardiotomy blood was never processed. Pre-operatively, 76% of perfusion groups assessed their patients (21% directly with the patient), and 85% responded that perfusionists performed or participated in a formal pre-bypass checklist. The majority of the perfusion groups used a handwritten perfusion record (62%), 12% used an electronic perfusion record, and 26% used both, whereas more than one half of the groups were involved in quality assurance (79%), incident reporting (74%), audits (62%), research (53%), participating in interdisciplinary meetings (53%), and morbidity and mortality meetings (65%). Only 26% conducted formal perfusion team meetings. This report outlines the status of clinical management and procedural performance for perfusion practices in Australia and New Zealand in 2003. Awareness of these trends will allow perfusionists to assess both individual practices and unit performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19681302      PMCID: PMC4680208     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol        ISSN: 0022-1058


  32 in total

1.  Specific bypass conditions determine safe minimum flow rate.

Authors:  Vesa Anttila; Ikuo Hagino; David Zurakowski; Yusuke Iwata; Lennart Duebener; Hart G W Lidov; Richard A Jonas
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Major factors in the controversy of pulsatile versus nonpulsatile flow during acute and chronic cardiac support.

Authors:  Akif Undar; Gerson Rosenberg; John L Myers
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 3.  Pro: during cardiopulmonary bypass for elective coronary artery bypass grafting, perfusion pressure should routinely be greater than 70 mmHg.

Authors:  G Hartman
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 4.  Con: during cardiopulmonary bypass for elective coronary artery bypass grafting, perfusion pressure should not routinely be greater than 70 mmHg.

Authors:  C R Cartwright; C M Mangano
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Australasian perfusion incident survey.

Authors:  O F Jenkins; R Morris; J M Simpson
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A survey of cardiopulmonary bypass perfusion practices in Australia in 1992.

Authors:  P R Wajon; R G Walsh; N L Symons
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.669

Review 7.  Management of temperature during and after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Nancy A Nussmeier
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2005

8.  Mortality associated with aprotinin during 5 years following coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Dennis T Mangano; Yinghui Miao; Alain Vuylsteke; Iulia C Tudor; Rajiv Juneja; Daniela Filipescu; Andreas Hoeft; Manuel L Fontes; Zak Hillel; Elisabeth Ott; Tatiana Titov; Cynthia Dietzel; Jack Levin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Improvement of outcomes after coronary artery bypass II: a randomized trial comparing intraoperative high versus customized mean arterial pressure.

Authors:  Mary E Charlson; Janey C Peterson; Karl H Krieger; Gregg S Hartman; James P Hollenberg; William M Briggs; Alan Z Segal; Manish Parikh; Stephen J Thomas; Rebecca G Donahue; Mary Helen Purcell; Paul A Pirraglia; O Wayne Isom
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.620

10.  The cardiotomy trial: a randomized, double-blind study to assess the effect of processing of shed blood during cardiopulmonary bypass on transfusion and neurocognitive function.

Authors:  Fraser D Rubens; Munir Boodhwani; Thierry Mesana; Denise Wozny; George Wells; Howard J Nathan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  7 in total

1.  D'où venons-nous/que somes nous/où allons nous? Accidents are inevitable.

Authors:  Timothy W Willcox
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2012-03

2.  A 2013 Survey on Pressure Monitoring in Adult Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits: Modes and Applications.

Authors:  Laura Rigg; Bruce Searles; Edward Morse Darling
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2014-12

3.  Observation and participation.

Authors:  Robert C Groom
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2009-06

4.  Global Cardioplegia Practices: Results from the Global Cardiopulmonary Bypass Survey.

Authors:  Jason M Ali; Lachlan F Miles; Yasir Abu-Omar; Carlos Galhardo; Florian Falter
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2018-06

5.  Is Conventional Bypass for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery a Misnomer?

Authors:  Donald S Likosky; Robert A Baker; Richard F Newland; Theron A Paugh; Timothy A Dickinson; David Fitzgerald; Joshua B Goldberg; Nicholas B Mellas; Alan F Merry; Paul S Myles; Gaetano Paone; Kenneth G Shann; Jane Ottens; Timothy W Willcox
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2018-12

6.  Using machine learning to predict perfusionists' critical decision-making during cardiac surgery.

Authors:  R D Dias; M A Zenati; G Rance; Rithy Srey; D Arney; L Chen; R Paleja; L R Kennedy-Metz; M Gombolay
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis       Date:  2021-12-03

7.  A survey of practices during cardiopulmonary bypass in India: An Indian association of cardiovascular and thoracic anesthesiologist endeavor.

Authors:  Deepak Prakash Borde; Shreedhar S Joshi; Murali Chakravarthy; Vishwas Malik; Ranjith B Karthekeyan; Antony George; Thomas Koshy; Uday Gandhe; Suresh G Nair
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.