Henk van der Poel1, Willem Brinkman2, Ben van Cleynenbreugel3, Panagiotis Kallidonis4,5, Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg4, Evangelos Liatsikos5, Kamran Ahmed6,7, Oliver Brunckhorst6,7, Mohammed Shamim Khan6,7, Minh Do4, Roman Ganzer4, Declan G Murphy8,9,10, Simon Van Rij8, Philip E Dundee9,10, Prokar Dasgupta6,7. 1. Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Urology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Urology, University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 4. Department of Urology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. 5. Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece. 6. MRC Centre for Transplantation, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, King's College London, London, UK. 7. Department of Urology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's Health Partners, London, UK. 8. Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia. 9. Epworth Prostate Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, SA, Australia. 10. Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe the progress being made in training for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in urology. METHODS: A group of experts in the field provided input to agree on recommendations for MIS training. A literature search was carried out to identify studies on MIS training, both in general and specifically for urological procedures. RESULTS: The literature search showed the rapidly developing options for e-learning, box and virtual training, and suggested that box training is a relatively cheap and effective means of improving laparoscopic skills. Development of non-technical skills is an integral part of surgical skills training and should be included in training curricula. The application of modular training in surgical procedures showed more rapid skills acquisition. Training curricula for MIS in urology are being developed in both the USA and Europe. CONCLUSION: Training in MIS has shifted from 'see-one-do-one-teach-one' to a structured learning, from e-learning to skills laboratory and modular training settings.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the progress being made in training for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in urology. METHODS: A group of experts in the field provided input to agree on recommendations for MIS training. A literature search was carried out to identify studies on MIS training, both in general and specifically for urological procedures. RESULTS: The literature search showed the rapidly developing options for e-learning, box and virtual training, and suggested that box training is a relatively cheap and effective means of improving laparoscopic skills. Development of non-technical skills is an integral part of surgical skills training and should be included in training curricula. The application of modular training in surgical procedures showed more rapid skills acquisition. Training curricula for MIS in urology are being developed in both the USA and Europe. CONCLUSION: Training in MIS has shifted from 'see-one-do-one-teach-one' to a structured learning, from e-learning to skills laboratory and modular training settings.
Authors: Erika Palagonia; Elio Mazzone; Geert De Naeyer; Frederiek D'Hondt; Justin Collins; Pawel Wisz; Fijs W B Van Leeuwen; Henk Van Der Poel; Peter Schatteman; Alexandre Mottrie; Paolo Dell'Oglio Journal: World J Urol Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Bartosz Brzoszczyk; Tomasz Milecki; Piotr Jarzemski; Andrzej Antczak; Artur Antoniewicz; Anna Kołodziej Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Date: 2019-01-22 Impact factor: 1.195
Authors: Cora Griffin; Abdullatif Aydın; Oliver Brunckhorst; Nicholas Raison; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed Journal: World J Urol Date: 2019-09-17 Impact factor: 4.226