Literature DB >> 30374670

Vision for the future on urolithiasis: research, management, education and training-some personal views.

A Rodgers1,2, A Trinchieri3,2, M H Ather4,2, N Buchholz5,6.   

Abstract

The field of urolithiasis has undergone many rapid changes in the last 3 decades. In this article, three eminent experts in various fields of urolithiasis research describe their respective visions for the future in stone research, stone treatment and surgical training. Many stone researchers have seen and regretted that there has not been a real breakthrough for decades now. Exceptions are the application of citrate prophylaxis and the abandonment of calcium-avoiding diet in stone formers. Certain areas of stone research have been exhausted and the body of literature available should suffice as background knowledge in those. Yet, to find meaningful mechanisms of clinically applicable stone prevention, the limited funds which are currently available should be used to research priority areas, of which crystal-cell interaction is envisioned by one of the present authors as being a crucial direction in future stone research. In the opinion of the second author, surgical stone treatment is very much technology-driven. This applies to the evolution of existing technologies and instruments. In addition, robotics, IT and communication software, and artificial intelligence are promising and are steadily making a meaningful impact in medicine in general, and endourology in particular. Finally, the third author believes that despite the exciting advances in technology, the role of the surgeon can never be replaced. The idea of a fully automated, artificially thinking and robotically performing system treating patients medically and surgically will not appeal to urologists or patients but may at least be a partial reality. His vision therefore is that surgical training will have to take on a new dimension, away from the patient and towards virtual reality, until the skill set is acceptably developed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Education; Future; Managment; Research; Training; Urolithiasis; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30374670     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-018-1086-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  74 in total

1.  Remote percutaneous renal access using a new automated telesurgical robotic system.

Authors:  J Bauer; B R Lee; D Stoianovici; J T Bishoff; S Micali; F Micali; L R Kavoussi
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000.

Authors:  A Hesse; E Brändle; D Wilbert; K-U Köhrmann; P Alken
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Robotic percutaneous access to the kidney: comparison with standard manual access.

Authors:  Li-Ming Su; Dan Stoianovici; Thomas W Jarrett; Alexandru Patriciu; William W Roberts; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Sanjay Ramakumar; Stephen B Solomon; Louis R Kavoussi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Robotically driven interventions: a method of using CT fluoroscopy without radiation exposure to the physician.

Authors:  Stephen B Solomon; Alexandru Patriciu; Mark E Bohlman; Louis R Kavoussi; Dan Stoianovici
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Observations on the analysis of ten thousand urinary calculi.

Authors:  L C HERRING
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Artificial intelligence in medicine.

Authors:  A N Ramesh; C Kambhampati; J R T Monson; P J Drew
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994.

Authors:  Kiriaki K Stamatelou; Mildred E Francis; Camille A Jones; Leroy M Nyberg; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 10.612

8.  Relationship of frequency, age, sex, stone weight and composition in 15,624 stones: comparison of resutls for 1980 to 1983 and 1995 to 1998.

Authors:  M H Gault; L Chafe
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Increase in the prevalence of symptomatic upper urinary tract stones during the last ten years.

Authors:  A Trinchieri; F Coppi; E Montanari; A Del Nero; G Zanetti; E Pisani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 10.  Modulators of urinary stone formation.

Authors:  Saeed R Khan; Dirk J Kok
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2004-05-01
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Novel Education and Simulation Tools in Urologic Training.

Authors:  Brandon S Childs; Marc D Manganiello; Ruslan Korets
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Application of Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Mixed Reality in Endourology and Urolithiasis: An Update by YAU Endourology and Urolithiasis Working Group.

Authors:  B M Zeeshan Hameed; Shraddha Somani; Etienne Xavier Keller; R Balamanigandan; Satyasundara Mahapatra; Amelia Pietropaolo; Şenol Tonyali; Patrick Juliebø-Jones; Nithesh Naik; Dilip Mishra; Sarvesh Kumar; Piotr Chlosta; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-01

3.  Oral chemolysis is an effective, non-invasive therapy for urinary stones suspected of uric acid content.

Authors:  Arman Tsaturyan; Elizaveta Bokova; Piet Bosshard; Olivier Bonny; Daniel G Fuster; Beat Roth
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.436

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.