Literature DB >> 31428847

The safety of urologic robotic surgery depends on the skills of the surgeon.

Erika Palagonia1,2, Elio Mazzone1,2,3, Geert De Naeyer1,2, Frederiek D'Hondt1,2, Justin Collins1, Pawel Wisz1,2, Fijs W B Van Leeuwen1,4,5, Henk Van Der Poel5, Peter Schatteman1,2, Alexandre Mottrie1,2, Paolo Dell'Oglio6,7,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the available literature evidence that discusses the effect of surgical experience on patient outcomes in robotic setting. This information is used to help understand how we can develop a learning process that allows surgeons to maximally accommodate patient safety.
METHODS: A literature search of the MEDLINE/PubMed and Scopus database was performed. Original and review articles published in the English language were included after an interactive peer-review process of the panel.
RESULTS: Robotic surgical procedures require high level of experience to guarantee patient safety. This means that, for some procedures, the learning process might be longer than originally expected. In this context, structured training programs that assist surgeons to improve outcomes during their learning processes were extensively discussed. We identified few structured robotic curricula and demonstrated that for some procedures, curriculum trained surgeons can achieve outcomes rates during their initial learning phases that are at least comparable to those of experienced surgeons from high-volume centres. Finally, the importance of non-technical skills on patient safety and of their inclusion in robotic training programs was also assessed.
CONCLUSION: To guarantee safe robotic surgery and to optimize patient outcomes during the learning process, standardized and validated training programs are instrumental. To date, only few structured validated curricula exist for standardized training and further efforts are needed in this direction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Learning curve; Robot-assisted surgery; Safety; Surgical skills; Training

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31428847     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02901-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  71 in total

Review 1.  Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review.

Authors:  H W R Schreuder; R Wolswijk; R P Zweemer; M P Schijven; R H M Verheijen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Contemporary National Assessment of Robot-Assisted Surgery Rates and Total Hospital Charges for Major Surgical Uro-Oncological Procedures in the United States.

Authors:  Elio Mazzone; Francesco A Mistretta; Sophie Knipper; Zhe Tian; Alessandro Larcher; Hugues Widmer; Kevin Zorn; Umberto Capitanio; Markus Graefen; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Fred Saad; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Cancer control and functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy as markers of surgical quality: analysis of heterogeneity between surgeons at a single cancer center.

Authors:  Andrew Vickers; Caroline Savage; Fernando Bianco; John Mulhall; Jaspreet Sandhu; Bertrand Guillonneau; Angel Cronin; Peter Scardino
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  The evolution of long noncoding RNA acceptance in prostate cancer initiation, progression, and its clinical utility in disease management.

Authors:  Varune Rohan Ramnarine; Maxim Kobelev; Ewan A Gibb; Mannan Nouri; Dong Lin; Yuzhuo Wang; Ralph Buttyan; Elai Davicioni; Amina Zoubeidi; Colin C Collins
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Reply from Authors re: Jens. J. Rassweiler, Marcel Fiedler-Hruza. The Learning Curve for Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: There is Much Beyond a Trifecta. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.022: The Clinical Implications of Surgical Learning Curve Analysis: Can We Optimize Patient Outcomes Using Structured Training Programs?

Authors:  Alessandro Larcher; Fabio Muttin; Gianfranco Baiamonte; Benoit Peyronnet; Geert De Naeyer; Zine-Eddine Khene; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Cristina Ferreiro; Peter Schatteman; Umberto Capitanio; Frederiek D'Hondt; Francesco Montorsi; Karim Bensalah; Alexandre Mottrie
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Developing a comprehensive, proficiency-based training program for robotic surgery.

Authors:  Genevieve Dulan; Robert V Rege; Deborah C Hogg; Kristine M Gilberg-Fisher; Nabeel A Arain; Seifu T Tesfay; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Superior Biochemical Recurrence and Long-term Quality-of-life Outcomes Are Achievable with Robotic Radical Prostatectomy After a Long Learning Curve-Updated Analysis of a Prospective Single-surgeon Cohort of 2206 Consecutive Cases.

Authors:  James E Thompson; Sam Egger; Maret Böhm; Amila R Siriwardana; Anne-Maree Haynes; Jayne Matthews; Matthijs J Scheltema; Phillip D Stricker
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal neobladder - what is the effect of the learning curve on outcomes?

Authors:  Justin W Collins; Stavros Tyritzis; Tommy Nyberg; Martin C Schumacher; Oscar Laurin; Christofer Adding; Martin Jonsson; Dinyar Khazaeli; Gunnar Steineck; Peter Wiklund; Abolfazl Hosseini
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Development of a standardised training curriculum for robotic surgery: a consensus statement from an international multidisciplinary group of experts.

Authors:  Kamran Ahmed; Reenam Khan; Alexandre Mottrie; Catherine Lovegrove; Ronny Abaza; Rajesh Ahlawat; Thomas Ahlering; Goran Ahlgren; Walter Artibani; Eric Barret; Xavier Cathelineau; Ben Challacombe; Patrick Coloby; Muhammad S Khan; Jacques Hubert; Maurice Stephan Michel; Francesco Montorsi; Declan Murphy; Joan Palou; Vipul Patel; Pierre-Thierry Piechaud; Hendrik Van Poppel; Pascal Rischmann; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Stefan Siemer; Michael Stoeckle; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Jean-Etienne Terrier; Joachim W Thüroff; Christophe Vaessen; Henk G Van Der Poel; Ben Van Cleynenbreugel; Alessandro Volpe; Christian Wagner; Peter Wiklund; Timothy Wilson; Manfred Wirth; Jörn Witt; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 10.  Training in Robotic Surgery-an Overview.

Authors:  Ashwin N Sridhar; Tim P Briggs; John D Kelly; Senthil Nathan
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.092

View more
  6 in total

1.  Robotic surgery in urology: the way forward.

Authors:  Riccardo Autorino; Francesco Porpiglia
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Non-technical skills in robotic surgery and impact on near-miss events: a multi-center study.

Authors:  Anthony Manuguerra; Charles Mazeaud; Nicolas Hubert; Pascal Eschwège; Mathieu Roumiguié; Julia Salleron; Jacques Hubert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Machine learning in the optimization of robotics in the operative field.

Authors:  Runzhuo Ma; Erik B Vanstrum; Ryan Lee; Jian Chen; Andrew J Hung
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.808

4.  Surgical safety.

Authors:  Siska Van Bruwaene
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Five Years of the CC-ERUS Fellowship: A Survey of the Experiences and Post-fellowship Work of the Fellows.

Authors:  Alexander J W Beulens; Paulo Dell'Oglio; Hannah Kiss; Willem M Brinkman; Alessandro Larcher; Alexandre Mottrie; Christian Wagner; Henk G van der Poel
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2020-05-04

6.  Objective assessment of intraoperative skills for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): results from the ERUS Scientific and Educational Working Groups Metrics Initiative.

Authors:  Alexandre Mottrie; Elio Mazzone; Peter Wiklund; Markus Graefen; Justin W Collins; Ruben De Groote; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Stefano Puliatti; Anthony G Gallagher
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 5.588

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.