Literature DB >> 26352168

Ultra-low dose CT attenuation correction for PET/CT: analysis of sparse view data acquisition and reconstruction algorithms.

Xue Rui1, Lishui Cheng, Yong Long, Lin Fu, Adam M Alessio, Evren Asma, Paul E Kinahan, Bruno De Man.   

Abstract

For PET/CT systems, PET image reconstruction requires corresponding CT images for anatomical localization and attenuation correction. In the case of PET respiratory gating, multiple gated CT scans can offer phase-matched attenuation and motion correction, at the expense of increased radiation dose. We aim to minimize the dose of the CT scan, while preserving adequate image quality for the purpose of PET attenuation correction by introducing sparse view CT data acquisition.We investigated sparse view CT acquisition protocols resulting in ultra-low dose CT scans designed for PET attenuation correction. We analyzed the tradeoffs between the number of views and the integrated tube current per view for a given dose using CT and PET simulations of a 3D NCAT phantom with lesions inserted into liver and lung. We simulated seven CT acquisition protocols with {984, 328, 123, 41, 24, 12, 8} views per rotation at a gantry speed of 0.35 s. One standard dose and four ultra-low dose levels, namely, 0.35 mAs, 0.175 mAs, 0.0875 mAs, and 0.043 75 mAs, were investigated. Both the analytical Feldkamp, Davis and Kress (FDK) algorithm and the Model Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR) algorithm were used for CT image reconstruction. We also evaluated the impact of sinogram interpolation to estimate the missing projection measurements due to sparse view data acquisition. For MBIR, we used a penalized weighted least squares (PWLS) cost function with an approximate total-variation (TV) regularizing penalty function. We compared a tube pulsing mode and a continuous exposure mode for sparse view data acquisition. Global PET ensemble root-mean-squares-error (RMSE) and local ensemble lesion activity error were used as quantitative evaluation metrics for PET image quality.With sparse view sampling, it is possible to greatly reduce the CT scan dose when it is primarily used for PET attenuation correction with little or no measureable effect on the PET image. For the four ultra-low dose levels simulated, sparse view protocols with 41 and 24 views best balanced the tradeoff between electronic noise and aliasing artifacts. In terms of lesion activity error and ensemble RMSE of the PET images, these two protocols, when combined with MBIR, are able to provide results that are comparable to the baseline full dose CT scan. View interpolation significantly improves the performance of FDK reconstruction but was not necessary for MBIR. With the more technically feasible continuous exposure data acquisition, the CT images show an increase in azimuthal blur compared to tube pulsing. However, this blurring generally does not have a measureable impact on PET reconstructed images.Our simulations demonstrated that ultra-low-dose CT-based attenuation correction can be achieved at dose levels on the order of 0.044 mAs with little impact on PET image quality. Highly sparse 41- or 24- view ultra-low dose CT scans are feasible for PET attenuation correction, providing the best tradeoff between electronic noise and view aliasing artifacts. The continuous exposure acquisition mode could potentially be implemented in current commercially available scanners, thus enabling sparse view data acquisition without requiring x-ray tubes capable of operating in a pulsing mode.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26352168      PMCID: PMC5260824          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/19/7437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  43 in total

Review 1.  X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners.

Authors:  Paul E Kinahan; Bruce H Hasegawa; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  4D-CT imaging of a volume influenced by respiratory motion on multi-slice CT.

Authors:  Tinsu Pan; Ting-Yim Lee; Eike Rietzel; George T Y Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Model-based image reconstruction for four-dimensional PET.

Authors:  Tianfang Li; Brian Thorndyke; Eduard Schreibmann; Yong Yang; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Penalized-likelihood sinogram restoration for computed tomography.

Authors:  Patrick J La Rivière; Junguo Bian; Phillip A Vargas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Statistical reconstruction for x-ray computed tomography using energy-integrating detectors.

Authors:  Giovanni M Lasio; Bruce R Whiting; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Monitoring cancer treatment with PET/CT: does it make a difference?

Authors:  Wolfgang A Weber; Robert Figlin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  3D forward and back-projection for X-ray CT using separable footprints.

Authors:  Yong Long; Jeffrey A Fessler; James M Balter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Ordered subsets algorithms for transmission tomography.

Authors:  H Erdogan; J A Fessler
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  A splitting-based iterative algorithm for accelerated statistical X-ray CT reconstruction.

Authors:  Sathish Ramani; Jeffrey A Fessler
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients.

Authors:  C Burger; G Goerres; S Schoenes; A Buck; A H R Lonn; G K Von Schulthess
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-04-19       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  4 in total

1.  SPULTRA: Low-Dose CT Image Reconstruction With Joint Statistical and Learned Image Models.

Authors:  Siqi Ye; Saiprasad Ravishankar; Yong Long; Jeffrey A Fessler
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 2.  Operational and Dosimetric Aspects of Pediatric PET/CT.

Authors:  Frederic H Fahey; Alison Goodkind; Robert D MacDougall; Leah Oberg; Sonja I Ziniel; Richard Cappock; Michael J Callahan; Neha Kwatra; S Ted Treves; Stephan D Voss
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Fast analytical approach of application specific dose efficient spectrum selection for diagnostic CT imaging and PET attenuation correction.

Authors:  Xue Rui; Yannan Jin; Paul F FitzGerald; Mingye Wu; Adam M Alessio; Paul E Kinahan; Bruno De Man
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Low-dose CT for the spatial normalization of PET images: A validation procedure for amyloid-PET semi-quantification.

Authors:  Luca Presotto; Leonardo Iaccarino; Arianna Sala; Emilia G Vanoli; Cristina Muscio; Anna Nigri; Maria Grazia Bruzzone; Fabrizio Tagliavini; Luigi Gianolli; Daniela Perani; Valentino Bettinardi
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 4.881

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.