Literature DB >> 17404467

Statistical reconstruction for x-ray computed tomography using energy-integrating detectors.

Giovanni M Lasio1, Bruce R Whiting, Jeffrey F Williamson.   

Abstract

Statistical image reconstruction (SR) algorithms have the potential to significantly reduce x-ray CT image artefacts because they use a more accurate model than conventional filtered backprojection and can incorporate effects such as noise, incomplete data and nonlinear detector response. Most SR algorithms assume that the CT detectors are photon-counting devices and generate Poisson-distributed signals. However, actual CT detectors integrate energy from the x-ray beam and exhibit compound Poisson-distributed signal statistics. This study presents the first assessment of the impact on image quality of the resultant mismatch between the detector and signal statistics models assumed by the sinogram data model and the reconstruction algorithm. A 2D CT projection simulator was created to generate synthetic polyenergetic transmission data assuming (i) photon-counting with simple Poisson-distributed signals and (ii) energy-weighted detection with compound Poisson-distributed signals. An alternating minimization (AM) algorithm was used to reconstruct images from the data models (i) and (ii) for a typical abdominal scan protocol with incident particle fluence levels ranging from 10(5) to 1.6 x 10(6) photons/detector. The images reconstructed from data models (i) and (ii) were compared by visual inspection and image-quality figures of merit. The reconstructed image quality degraded significantly when the means were mismatched from the assumed model. However, if the signal means are appropriately modified, images from data models (i) and (ii) did not differ significantly even when SNR is very low. While data-mean mismatches characteristic of the difference between particle-fluence and energy-fluence transmission can cause significant streaking and cupping artefacts, the mismatch between the actual and assumed CT detector signal statistics did not significantly degrade image quality once systematic data means mismatches were corrected.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17404467     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/8/014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  26 in total

1.  Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Xin Liu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Mingliang Qu; Jodie Christner; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2009-10

2.  Validation of CT dose-reduction simulation.

Authors:  Parinaz Massoumzadeh; Steven Don; Charles F Hildebolt; Kyongtae T Bae; Bruce R Whiting
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Electronic noise modeling in statistical iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Jingyan Xu; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 10.856

4.  Noise-resolution tradeoffs in x-ray CT imaging: a comparison of penalized alternating minimization and filtered backprojection algorithms.

Authors:  Joshua D Evans; David G Politte; Bruce R Whiting; Joseph A O'Sullivan; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Metal artifact correction for x-ray computed tomography using kV and selective MV imaging.

Authors:  Meng Wu; Andreas Keil; Dragos Constantin; Josh Star-Lack; Lei Zhu; Rebecca Fahrig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Dose reduction in oncological staging multidetector CT: effect of iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  M Karpitschka; D Augart; H-C Becker; M Reiser; A Graser
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Variance analysis of x-ray CT sinograms in the presence of electronic noise background.

Authors:  Jianhua Ma; Zhengrong Liang; Yi Fan; Yan Liu; Jing Huang; Wufan Chen; Hongbing Lu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Regularization strategies in statistical image reconstruction of low-dose x-ray CT: A review.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Jing Wang; Dong Zeng; Xi Tao; Jianhua Ma
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Mixed Confidence Estimation for Iterative CT Reconstruction.

Authors:  David S Perlmutter; Soo Mee Kim; Paul E Kinahan; Adam M Alessio
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Adaptive-weighted total variation minimization for sparse data toward low-dose x-ray computed tomography image reconstruction.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Jianhua Ma; Yi Fan; Zhengrong Liang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.