Literature DB >> 26343917

Template-based protein structure prediction in CASP11 and retrospect of I-TASSER in the last decade.

Jianyi Yang1,2, Wenxuan Zhang1,2, Baoji He1,2, Sara Elizabeth Walker1,2, Hongjiu Zhang1,2, Brandon Govindarajoo1,2, Jouko Virtanen1,2, Zhidong Xue1,2, Hong-Bin Shen1,2, Yang Zhang3,4.   

Abstract

We report the structure prediction results of a new composite pipeline for template-based modeling (TBM) in the 11th CASP experiment. Starting from multiple structure templates identified by LOMETS based meta-threading programs, the QUARK ab initio folding program is extended to generate initial full-length models under strong constraints from template alignments. The final atomic models are then constructed by I-TASSER based fragment reassembly simulations, followed by the fragment-guided molecular dynamic simulation and the MQAP-based model selection. It was found that the inclusion of QUARK-TBM simulations as an intermediate modeling step could help improve the quality of the I-TASSER models for both Easy and Hard TBM targets. Overall, the average TM-score of the first I-TASSER model is 12% higher than that of the best LOMETS templates, with the RMSD in the same threading-aligned regions reduced from 5.8 to 4.7 Å. Nevertheless, there are nearly 18% of TBM domains with the templates deteriorated by the structure assembly pipeline, which may be attributed to the errors of secondary structure and domain orientation predictions that propagate through and degrade the procedures of template identification and final model selections. To examine the record of progress, we made a retrospective report of the I-TASSER pipeline in the last five CASP experiments (CASP7-11). The data show no clear progress of the LOMETS threading programs over PSI-BLAST; but obvious progress on structural improvement relative to threading templates was witnessed in recent CASP experiments, which is probably attributed to the integration of the extended ab initio folding simulation with the threading assembly pipeline and the introduction of atomic-level structure refinements following the reduced modeling simulations. Proteins 2016; 84(Suppl 1):233-246.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CASP11; I-TASSER; QUARK; protein structure prediction; threading

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26343917      PMCID: PMC4781680          DOI: 10.1002/prot.24918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  40 in total

1.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions.

Authors:  Krzysztof Ginalski; Arne Elofsson; Daniel Fischer; Leszek Rychlewski
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  TOUCHSTONE II: a new approach to ab initio protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Andrzej Kolinski; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-12-01

6.  Structure of Burkholderia cepacia UDP-glucose dehydrogenase (UGD) BceC and role of Tyr10 in final hydrolysis of UGD thioester intermediate.

Authors:  Joana Rocha; Alma O Popescu; Patrícia Borges; Dalila Mil-Homens; Leonilde M Moreira; Isabel Sá-Correia; Arsénio M Fialho; Carlos Frazão
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  CASP10 results compared to those of previous CASP experiments.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Krzysztof Fidelis; John Moult
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-12-17

8.  I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction.

Authors:  Yang Zhang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography.

Authors:  Vincent B Chen; W Bryan Arendall; Jeffrey J Headd; Daniel A Keedy; Robert M Immormino; Gary J Kapral; Laura W Murray; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-12-21

10.  LOMETS: a local meta-threading-server for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Sitao Wu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  26 in total

1.  Template-based and free modeling of I-TASSER and QUARK pipelines using predicted contact maps in CASP12.

Authors:  Chengxin Zhang; S M Mortuza; Baoji He; Yanting Wang; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-11-14

2.  In silico prediction of prolactin molecules as a tool for equine genomics reproduction.

Authors:  A Neis; F S Kremer; L S Pinto; P M M Leon
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 2.943

3.  Comparative evaluation of structure and characteristic of peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase proteins and their function in Salmonella Typhimurium stress responses and virulence.

Authors:  Manoj Kumawat; Piyush Kumar Singh; Supriya Rajendra Rananaware; Sushma Ahlawat
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 2.099

4.  Performance of protein-structure predictions with the physics-based UNRES force field in CASP11.

Authors:  Paweł Krupa; Magdalena A Mozolewska; Marta Wiśniewska; Yanping Yin; Yi He; Adam K Sieradzan; Robert Ganzynkowicz; Agnieszka G Lipska; Agnieszka Karczyńska; Magdalena Ślusarz; Rafał Ślusarz; Artur Giełdoń; Cezary Czaplewski; Dawid Jagieła; Bartłomiej Zaborowski; Harold A Scheraga; Adam Liwo
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Identification of the High-affinity Substrate-binding Site of the Multidrug and Toxic Compound Extrusion (MATE) Family Transporter from Pseudomonas stutzeri.

Authors:  Laiyin Nie; Ernst Grell; Viveka Nand Malviya; Hao Xie; Jingkang Wang; Hartmut Michel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Why Is There a Glass Ceiling for Threading Based Protein Structure Prediction Methods?

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Hongyi Zhou
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  PREFMD: a web server for protein structure refinement via molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Lim Heo; Michael Feig
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  High-resolution structure prediction of β-barrel membrane proteins.

Authors:  Wei Tian; Meishan Lin; Ke Tang; Jie Liang; Hammad Naveed
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Structural and functional divergence of GDAP1 from the glutathione S-transferase superfamily.

Authors:  Matthew R Googins; Aigbirhemwen O Woghiren-Afegbua; Michael Calderon; Claudette M St Croix; Kirill I Kiselyov; Andrew P VanDemark
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 5.834

10.  CASP11--An Evaluation of a Modular BCL::Fold-Based Protein Structure Prediction Pipeline.

Authors:  Axel W Fischer; Sten Heinze; Daniel K Putnam; Bian Li; James C Pino; Yan Xia; Carlos F Lopez; Jens Meiler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.