Literature DB >> 27748116

Why Is There a Glass Ceiling for Threading Based Protein Structure Prediction Methods?

Jeffrey Skolnick1, Hongyi Zhou1.   

Abstract

Despite their different implementations, comparison of the best threading approaches to the prediction of evolutionary distant protein structures reveals that they tend to succeed or fail on the same protein targets. This is true despite the fact that the structural template library has good templates for all cases. Thus, a key question is why are certain protein structures threadable while others are not. Comparison with threading results on a set of artificial sequences selected for stability further argues that the failure of threading is due to the nature of the protein structures themselves. Using a new contact map based alignment algorithm, we demonstrate that certain folds are highly degenerate in that they can have very similar coarse grained fractions of native contacts aligned and yet differ significantly from the native structure. For threadable proteins, this is not the case. Thus, contemporary threading approaches appear to have reached a plateau, and new approaches to structure prediction are required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27748116      PMCID: PMC5398921          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b09517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  50 in total

1.  Further evidence for the likely completeness of the library of solved single domain protein structures.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Hongyi Zhou; Michal Brylinski
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  A threading-based method (FINDSITE) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation.

Authors:  Michal Brylinski; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Benchmarking of TASSER_2.0: an improved protein structure prediction algorithm with more accurate predicted contact restraints.

Authors:  Seung Yup Lee; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  CASP9 results compared to those of previous CASP experiments.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Krzysztof Fidelis; John Moult
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-14

5.  3DLigandSite: predicting ligand-binding sites using similar structures.

Authors:  Mark N Wass; Lawrence A Kelley; Michael J E Sternberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction.

Authors:  Yang Zhang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Fr-TM-align: a new protein structural alignment method based on fragment alignments and the TM-score.

Authors:  Shashi Bhushan Pandit; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Evaluation of free modeling targets in CASP11 and ROLL.

Authors:  Lisa N Kinch; Wenlin Li; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-01-20

9.  LOMETS: a local meta-threading-server for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Sitao Wu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  RaptorX-Property: a web server for protein structure property prediction.

Authors:  Sheng Wang; Wei Li; Shiwang Liu; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  3 in total

1.  Computational Methods for the Elucidation of Protein Structure and Interactions.

Authors:  Nicholas S Edmunds; Liam J McGuffin
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 2.  The role of local versus nonlocal physicochemical restraints in determining protein native structure.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Mu Gao
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 7.786

3.  DESTINI: A deep-learning approach to contact-driven protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Mu Gao; Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.