Literature DB >> 18488261

Technological options for the management of biosolids.

Hailong Wang1, Sally L Brown, Guna N Magesan, Alison H Slade, Michael Quintern, Peter W Clinton, Tim W Payn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND, AIM, AND SCOPE: Large quantities of biosolids (sewage sludge), which are produced from municipal wastewater treatment, are ever-increasing because of the commissioning of new treatment plants and continuous upgrades of the existing facilities. A large proportion of biosolids are currently landfilled. With increasing pressure from regulators and the general public, landfilling of biosolids is being phased out in many countries because of potential secondary pollution caused by leachate and the emission of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Biosolids contain nutrients and energy that can be used beneficially. Significant efforts have been made recently to develop new technologies to manage biosolids and make useful products from them. In this paper, we provide a review of the technologies in biosolids management.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey of literature was conducted.
RESULTS: At present, the most common beneficial use of biosolids is agricultural land application because of inherent fertilizer values found in biosolids. Expansion of land application, however, may be limited in the future because of more stringent regulatory requirements and public concern about food chain contamination in some countries. Perceived as a green energy source, the combustion of biosolids has received renewed interest. Anaerobic digestion is generally a more effective method than incineration for energy recovery, and digested biosolids are suitable for further beneficial use through land application. Although conventional incineration systems for biosolid management generally consume more energy than they produce because of the high moisture content in the biosolids, it is expected that more combustion systems, either monocombustion or cocombustion, will be built to cope with the increasing quantity of biosolids. DISCUSSION: Under the increasingly popular low-carbon economy policy, biosolids may be recognized as a renewable fuel and be eligible for 'carbon credits'. Because ash can be used to manufacture construction materials, combustion can provide a complete management for biosolids. A number of advanced thermal conversion technologies (e.g., supercritical water oxidation process and pyrolysis) are under development for biosolids management with a goal to generate useful products, such as higher quality fuels and recovery of phosphorus. With an ever-increasing demand for renewable energy, growing bioenergy crops and forests using biosolids as a fertilizer and soil amendment can not only contribute to the low-carbon economy but also maximize the nutrient and carbon value of the biosolids.
CONCLUSIONS: Land application of biosolids achieves a complete reuse of its nutrients and organic carbon at a relatively low cost. Therefore, land application should become a preferred management option where there is available land, the quality of biosolids meet regulatory requirements, and it is socially acceptable. Intensive energy cropping and forest production using biosolids can help us meet the ever-increasing demand for renewable energy, which can eliminate the contamination potential for food sources, a common social concern about land application of biosolids. In recent years, increasing numbers of national and local governments have adopted more stringent regulations toward biosolid management. Under such a political climate, biosolids producers will have to develop multireuse strategies for biosolids to avoid being caught because a single route management practice might be under pressure at a short notice. Conventional incineration systems for biosolids management generally consume more energy than they produce and, although by-products may be used in manufacturing, this process cannot be regarded as a beneficial use of biosolids. However, biosolids are likely to become a source of renewable energy and produce 'carbon credits' under the increasingly popular, low-carbon economy policy. RECOMMENDATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES: To manage biosolids in a sustainable manner, there is a need for further research in the following areas: achieving a higher degree of public understanding and acceptance for the beneficial use of biosolids, developing cost-efficient and effective thermal conversions for direct energy recovery from biosolids, advancing technology for phosphorus recovery, and selecting or breeding crops for efficient biofuel production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18488261     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-008-0012-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  33 in total

1.  Experience and lessons learned from sewage sludge pyrolysis in Australia.

Authors:  T R Bridle; S Skrypski-Mantele
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.915

2.  Dutch analysis for P-recovery from municipal wastewater.

Authors:  P Roeleveld; P Loeffen; H Temmink; B Klapwijk
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.915

3.  Temporal trends of total and potentially available element concentrations in sewage biosolids: a comparison of biosolid surveys conducted 18 years apart.

Authors:  I W Oliver; M J McLaughlin; G Merrington
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Nutrient and trace element leaching following mine reclamation with biosolids.

Authors:  Richard Stehouwer; Rick L Day; Kirsten E Macneal
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 2.751

5.  Immersion frying for the thermal drying of sewage sludge: an economic assessment.

Authors:  Carlos Peregrina; Victor Rudolph; Didier Lecomte; Patricia Arlabosse
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 6.789

6.  A technical and economic evaluation of the pyrolysis of sewage sludge for the production of bio-oil.

Authors:  Y Kim; W Parker
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 9.642

7.  Lightweight aggregate made from sewage sludge and incinerated ash.

Authors:  Ing-Jia Chiou; Kuen-Sheng Wang; Ching-Ho Chen; Ya-Ting Lin
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 7.145

8.  Selection of a water-extractable phosphorus test for manures and biosolids as an indicator of runoff loss potential.

Authors:  Peter Kleinman; Dan Sullivan; Ann Wolf; Robin Brandt; Zhengxia Dou; Herschel Elliott; John Kovar; April Leytem; Rory Maguire; Philip Moore; Lou Saporito; Andrew Sharpley; Amy Shober; Tom Sims; John Toth; Gurpal Toor; Hailin Zhang; Tiequan Zhang
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 2.751

9.  Cumulative and residual effects of repeated sewage sludge applications: forage productivity and soil quality implications in South Florida, USA.

Authors:  Gilbert C Sigua; Martin B Adjei; Jack E Rechcigl
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Evaluation of sewage sludge, septic waste and sludge compost applications to corn and forage: yields and N, P and K content of crops and soils.

Authors:  P R Warman; W C Termeer
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.642

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Utilization of urban sewage sludge: Chinese perspectives.

Authors:  H Chen; S-H Yan; Z-L Ye; H-J Meng; Y-G Zhu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Techno-economic and environmental assessment of biogas production from banana peel (Musa paradisiaca) in a biorefinery concept.

Authors:  Jimmy Anderson Martínez-Ruano; Ashley Sthefanía Caballero-Galván; Daissy Lorena Restrepo-Serna; Carlos Ariel Cardona
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Probabilistic evaluation of integrating resource recovery into wastewater treatment to improve environmental sustainability.

Authors:  Xu Wang; Perry L McCarty; Junxin Liu; Nan-Qi Ren; Duu-Jong Lee; Han-Qing Yu; Yi Qian; Jiuhui Qu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Investigation of biosolids degradation under flooded environments for use in underwater cover designs for mine tailing remediation.

Authors:  Yu Jia; Peter Nason; Christian Maurice; Lena Alakangas; Björn Öhlander
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Emergy Analysis for the Sustainable Utilization of Biosolids Generated in a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Authors:  Natalia A Cano Londoño; Darío Gallego Suárez; Héctor I Velásquez; Gerardo J Ruiz-Mercado
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 9.297

6.  Abandoned coal mining sites: using ecotoxicological tests to support an industrial organic sludge amendment.

Authors:  Claudete G Chiochetta; Marilice R Radetski; Albertina X R Corrêa; Vinícius Tischer; Erasmo N Tiepo; Claudemir M Radetski
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 7.  Biosolids management strategies: an evaluation of energy production as an alternative to land application.

Authors:  Maureen Egan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Improvement of nitrogen utilization and soil properties by addition of a mineral soil conditioner: mechanism and performance.

Authors:  Xiaodan Yan; Lin Shi; Rumeng Cai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Variations in organic carbon, aggregation, and enzyme activities of gangue-fly ash-reconstructed soils with sludge and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi during 6-year reclamation.

Authors:  Ningning Yin; Zhen Zhang; Liping Wang; Kuimei Qian
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Co-digestion of sewage sludge with crude or pretreated glycerol to increase biogas production.

Authors:  Janaína Dos Santos Ferreira; Isaac Volschan; Magali Christe Cammarota
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.