Rishabh Sethia1, Gregory J Wiet. 1. aCollege of Medicine bDepartment of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University cDepartment of Otolaryngology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The field of temporal bone simulation (TBS) has largely focused on the development and validation of simulators as training and assessment tools. As technology has progressed over the years, researchers have, however, envisioned new clinical applications for simulators extending to preoperative surgical planning and case rehearsal. The purpose of this article was to review the current state of the art in TBS and to highlight recent advancements in the field. Because of space limitations, we will limit our discussion to computer-based virtual reality simulators. RECENT FINDINGS: A review of the recent literature on TBS revealed very limited application of virtual reality simulators for preoperative preparation. Current evidence suggests limitations in fidelity preclude successful patient-specific case rehearsal using virtual reality simulation. Further investigation and clinical evaluation are required to validate its use outside of training and skill assessment. SUMMARY: This article provides an overview of the current use of virtual reality simulators with emphasis on preoperative planning. We evaluate the limitations of the technology, and discuss potential areas of improvement for the future. More studies are necessary to assess the value of virtual reality simulation for preoperative preparation.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The field of temporal bone simulation (TBS) has largely focused on the development and validation of simulators as training and assessment tools. As technology has progressed over the years, researchers have, however, envisioned new clinical applications for simulators extending to preoperative surgical planning and case rehearsal. The purpose of this article was to review the current state of the art in TBS and to highlight recent advancements in the field. Because of space limitations, we will limit our discussion to computer-based virtual reality simulators. RECENT FINDINGS: A review of the recent literature on TBS revealed very limited application of virtual reality simulators for preoperative preparation. Current evidence suggests limitations in fidelity preclude successful patient-specific case rehearsal using virtual reality simulation. Further investigation and clinical evaluation are required to validate its use outside of training and skill assessment. SUMMARY: This article provides an overview of the current use of virtual reality simulators with emphasis on preoperative planning. We evaluate the limitations of the technology, and discuss potential areas of improvement for the future. More studies are necessary to assess the value of virtual reality simulation for preoperative preparation.
Authors: Gregory J Wiet; Don Stredney; Dennis Sessanna; Jason A Bryan; D Bradley Welling; Petra Schmalbrock Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Yi Chen Zhao; Gregor Kennedy; Kumiko Yukawa; Brian Pyman; Stephen O'Leary Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2010-12-30 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Austin S Rose; Julia S Kimbell; Caroline E Webster; Ola L A Harrysson; Eric J Formeister; Craig A Buchman Journal: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Date: 2015-02-06 Impact factor: 1.547
Authors: Asit Arora; Sam Khemani; Neil Tolley; Arvind Singh; James Budge; David A Diaz Voss Varela; Howard W Francis; Ara Darzi; Nasir I Bhatti Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2011-11-03 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Andreas Frithioff; Martin Frendø; Kenneth Weiss; Søren Foghsgaard; David Bue Pedersen; Mads Sølvsten Sørensen; Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen Journal: OTO Open Date: 2021-12-13
Authors: Georges Hattab; Adamantini Hatzipanayioti; Anna Klimova; Micha Pfeiffer; Peter Klausing; Michael Breucha; Felix von Bechtolsheim; Jens R Helmert; Jürgen Weitz; Sebastian Pannasch; Stefanie Speidel Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 4.379