Literature DB >> 26734114

Assessment of the biocompatibility of three-dimensional-printed polymers using multispecies toxicity tests.

Feng Zhu1, Timo Friedrich2, Dayanthi Nugegoda, Jan Kaslin2, Donald Wlodkowic.   

Abstract

Additive manufacturing was adopted in multiple fields of life sciences. It is also becoming a popular tool for rapid prototyping of microfluidic and biomedical devices. Limited studies have been performed to investigate the biological implications of using 3D printed polymers. Here we assessed the biocompatibility of seven commercially available polymers, using a battery of standardized bioassays for chemical risk assessment. Our data show that leachates from photopolymers substrata appear to be very toxic to vertebrates and several invertebrate indicator organisms. These results demonstrate significant consequences for the use of selected photopolymers in the fabrication of bio-devices.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26734114      PMCID: PMC4691254          DOI: 10.1063/1.4939031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomicrofluidics        ISSN: 1932-1058            Impact factor:   2.800


  13 in total

Review 1.  3D printed microfluidics for biological applications.

Authors:  Chee Meng Benjamin Ho; Sum Huan Ng; King Ho Holden Li; Yong-Jin Yoon
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 6.799

2.  Three-dimensional printed millifluidic devices for zebrafish embryo tests.

Authors:  Feng Zhu; Joanna Skommer; Niall P Macdonald; Timo Friedrich; Jan Kaslin; Donald Wlodkowic
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  3D printed microfluidic devices with integrated versatile and reusable electrodes.

Authors:  Jayda L Erkal; Asmira Selimovic; Bethany C Gross; Sarah Y Lockwood; Eric L Walton; Stephen McNamara; R Scott Martin; Dana M Spence
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  3D printed microfluidic devices with integrated valves.

Authors:  Chad I Rogers; Kamran Qaderi; Adam T Woolley; Gregory P Nordin
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  Cost-effective three-dimensional printing of visibly transparent microchips within minutes.

Authors:  Aliaa I Shallan; Petr Smejkal; Monika Corban; Rosanne M Guijt; Michael C Breadmore
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  3D-printed microfluidic automation.

Authors:  Anthony K Au; Nirveek Bhattacharjee; Lisa F Horowitz; Tim C Chang; Albert Folch
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 6.799

7.  Is the fish embryo toxicity test (FET) with the zebrafish (Danio rerio) a potential alternative for the fish acute toxicity test?

Authors:  E Lammer; G J Carr; K Wendler; J M Rawlings; S E Belanger; Th Braunbeck
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.228

8.  Mail-order microfluidics: evaluation of stereolithography for the production of microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Anthony K Au; Wonjae Lee; Albert Folch
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 6.799

9.  Automated Lab-on-a-Chip Technology for Fish Embryo Toxicity Tests Performed under Continuous Microperfusion (μFET).

Authors:  Feng Zhu; Adriana Wigh; Timo Friedrich; Alain Devaux; Sylvie Bony; Dayanthi Nugegoda; Jan Kaslin; Donald Wlodkowic
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Predicting the behavior of microfluidic circuits made from discrete elements.

Authors:  Krisna C Bhargava; Bryant Thompson; Danish Iqbal; Noah Malmstadt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  The upcoming 3D-printing revolution in microfluidics.

Authors:  Nirveek Bhattacharjee; Arturo Urrios; Shawn Kang; Albert Folch
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 6.799

2.  A 3D-printed microbial cell culture platform with in situ PEGDA hydrogel barriers for differential substrate delivery.

Authors:  Andrea L Kadilak; Jessica C Rehaag; Cameron A Harrington; Leslie M Shor
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  A millifluidic chip for cultivation of fish embryos and toxicity testing fabricated by 3D printing technology.

Authors:  Petr Panuška; Zuzana Nejedlá; Jiří Smejkal; Petr Aubrecht; Michaela Liegertová; Marcel Štofik; Jaromír Havlica; Jan Malý
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.036

4.  Class II biocompatible E-Shell 300 3D printing material causes severe developmental toxicity in Danio rerio embryos and reduced cell proliferation in vitro - implications for 3D printed microfluidics.

Authors:  Zuzana Nejedlá; David Poustka; Regina Herma; Michaela Liegertová; Marcel Štofik; Jiří Smejkal; Václav Šícha; Pavel Kaule; Jan Malý
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.036

5.  3D-printing of transparent bio-microfluidic devices in PEG-DA.

Authors:  Arturo Urrios; Cesar Parra-Cabrera; Nirveek Bhattacharjee; Alan M Gonzalez-Suarez; Luis G Rigat-Brugarolas; Umashree Nallapatti; Josep Samitier; Cole A DeForest; Francesc Posas; José L Garcia-Cordero; Albert Folch
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  Characterization of 3D-Printed Moulds for Soft Lithography of Millifluidic Devices.

Authors:  Nurul Mohd Fuad; Megan Carve; Jan Kaslin; Donald Wlodkowic
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 7.  3D-Printed Chips: Compatibility of Additive Manufacturing Photopolymeric Substrata with Biological Applications.

Authors:  Megan Carve; Donald Wlodkowic
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  Study of Microchannels Fabricated Using Desktop Fused Deposition Modeling Systems.

Authors:  Muhammad Asif Ali Rehmani; Swapna A Jaywant; Khalid Mahmood Arif
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 2.891

9.  Cytotoxicity of polymers intended for the extrusion-based additive manufacturing of surgical guides.

Authors:  Felix Burkhardt; Benedikt C Spies; Christian Wesemann; Carl G Schirmeister; Erik H Licht; Florian Beuer; Thorsten Steinberg; Stefano Pieralli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  Biocompatibility of Blank, Post-Processed and Coated 3D Printed Resin Structures with Electrogenic Cells.

Authors:  Cacie Hart; Charles M Didier; Frank Sommerhage; Swaminathan Rajaraman
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.