| Literature DB >> 26338093 |
Leonard Grünwald1, Stephan Döbele1, Dankward Höntzsch1, Theddy Slongo2, Ulrich Stöckle1, Thomas Freude1, Steffen Schröter3.
Abstract
Correction of complex deformities is a challenging procedure. Long-term wearing of a fixator after correction and lengthening are inconvenient and has a high rate of complication. The goals of the surgical treatment in the presented case were: (1) correction of the deformity and lengthening of the left leg by the Taylor spatial frame (TSF, Smith and Nephew, Marl, Germany); (2) reduction in the time the patient wears the TSF by changing the fixation system to a plate (lengthening then plating-LTP) and using a locking compression plate in conjunction with the 5.0 dynamic locking screws in order to accelerate bone healing.Entities:
Keywords: Distraction osteogenesis; Dynamic locking screw; Lengthening then plating; Multiplanar deformity; Taylor spatial frame
Year: 2015 PMID: 26338093 PMCID: PMC4570884 DOI: 10.1007/s11751-015-0233-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr ISSN: 1828-8928
Fig. 1Preoperative full-weight-bearing long-leg radiograph. Analysis of the deformity with the planning software mediCAD (Hectec, Germany), angles according to Dror Paley. Measurements are in Table 1
Preoperative analyses of the deformity
| Right leg | Left leg | |
|---|---|---|
| mTFA | −3.2° | 12.7° |
| MPTA | 83.7° | 80.1° |
| mLDFA | 85.8° | 70.5° |
| Femoral rotation (CT) | −34° | −51° |
| Tibial rotation (CT) | +29° | +37° |
| Tibial slope | 8.5° | −16.4° |
| TT–TG distance (CT, cm) | 1.16 | 2.15 |
| Length femur (mm) | 450 | 428 |
| Length tibia (mm) | 401 | 379 |
| Leg length (mm) | 858 | 803 |
mTFA mechanical tibiofemoral angle, MPTA medial proximal tibial angle, mLDFA mechanical lateral distal femur angle, femoral torsion was measured according to Waidelich [10]. Tibial slope according to Amendola [11]. TT–TG Tuberositas Tibiae–Trochlea groove distance
Fig. 2Preoperative CT scan. Analyses of the rotational deformity of the femur and the tibia using Osirix MD (Switzerland). Method of measurement according to Waidelich [10]
Fig. 3Preoperative knee lateral view. Tibial slope according to Amendola [11]
Fig. 4Clinical picture of the mounted double TSF, 4 weeks postoperatively
Fig. 5Follow-up radiographs. Osteosynthesis with a nine-hole LCP in conjunction with three DLS 5.0 proximal and four LS 5.0 distal. Continuous bone healing. After 2 months, criteria for a biomechanically stable situation are visible. After 5 months, complete homogenous bony structures are visible
Fig. 6Postoperative full-weight-bearing long-leg radiograph. Analysis of the deformity with the planning software mediCAD (Hectec, Germany), angles according to Dror Paley. Measurements are in Table 2
Postoperative analyses of the deformity
| Right leg | Left leg | |
|---|---|---|
| mTFA | −2.2° | 2.1° |
| MPTA | 85° | 92.5° |
| mLDFA | 85.2° | 90.8° |
| Tibial slope | 8.5° | 2.5° |
| Length femur (mm) | 450 | 421 |
| Length tibia (mm) | 395 | 414 |
| Leg length (mm) | 857 | 837 |
mTFA mechanical tibiofemoral angle, MPTA medial proximal tibial angle, mLDFA mechanical tibiofemoral angle. Tibial slope according to Amendola [11]
Fig. 7Clinical pictures at the final follow-up after 10 months