Literature DB >> 1391819

[Computed tomographic torsion-angle and length measurement of the lower extremity. The methods, normal values and radiation load].

H A Waidelich1, W Strecker, E Schneider.   

Abstract

Complex corrective osteotomies in the lower extremities require precise preoperative planning. Fifty patients (37 male, 13 female) with an average age of 31 years (13 to 61 years) who had suffered fractures of the lower limbs and had been treated by osteosynthetic or conservative methods were studied, using a GE 9800 Quick CT; accurate and reproducible measurements of the angles of torsion of the femur and tibia were obtained. Digital images were produced to standardise the planes of measurement and to measure the length of the limb. The normal extremities of patients older than 18 years showed internal torsion of -20.4 +/- 9 degrees of the femur and external torsion of 33.1 +/- 8 degrees of the tibia. The most important clinical measurement is the intra-individual difference of the torsional angles. Amongst normals this is 4.3 +/- 2.3 degrees in the femur and 6.1 +/- 4.5 degrees in the tibia. Consequently, only angles greater than 9 degrees in the femur and 15 degrees in the tibia should be regarded as abnormal. Radiation exposure was measured by a LiF-thermoluminescence dosimeter on an Alderson phantom. Skin dose was 6.3 +/- 1.2 mGy and gonadal dose for females was 2.5 +/- 0.3 mGy and for males 0.7 +/- 0.1 mGy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1391819     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1033007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  47 in total

1.  [Analysis and correction of leg deformities. 1: Analysis].

Authors:  W Strecker; P Keppler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Length and angle measurements of the lower extremity in digital composite overview images.

Authors:  M Boewer; H Arndt; P A W Ostermann; J Petersein; S Mutze
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Assessment of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) lower limb measurements in adults: Comparison of micro-dose and low-dose biplanar radiographs.

Authors:  Andrea B Rosskopf; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Florian M Buck
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  [Not Available].

Authors:  W Strecker; P Keppler; L Kinzl
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  [Not Available].

Authors:  W Strecker; P Keppler; L Kinzl
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  [Determining the femoral antetorsion angle with a fluoroscopy-based optoelectronic navigation system: a precision analysis].

Authors:  C Keil; J von Recum; L-P Nolte; A Wentzensen; P A Grützner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Differences in Femoral Torsion Among Various Measurement Methods Increase in Hips With Excessive Femoral Torsion.

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Till D Lerch; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast; Simon D Steppacher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Medial open wedge vs. lateral closed wedge high tibial osteotomy - Indications based on the findings of patellar height, leg length, torsional correction and clinical outcome in one hundred cases.

Authors:  Felix Ferner; Christoph Lutter; Joerg Dickschas; Wolf Strecker
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Estimation of pretraumatic femoral antetorsion in bilateral femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Musa Citak; Mustafa Citak; Daniel Kendoff; Padhraig F O'Loughlin; Frank Tavassol; Michael Jagodzinski; Christian Krettek; Tobias Hüfner
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  [Long-term results after conservative treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures].

Authors:  M Fuchs; A Losch; E Noak; K M Stürmer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.