Literature DB >> 2584982

Total knee arthroplasty following high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis.

A Amendola1, C H Rorabeck, R B Bourne, P M Apyan.   

Abstract

The authors assessed the effect of proximal tibial osteotomy on the results of a subsequent total knee arthroplasty. A retrospective, clinical and radiographic analysis was carried out between a study group of 39 patients with 42 total knee arthroplasties following osteotomy and a control group of 39 patients with 41 primary arthroplasties. Outcome was assessed using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score, pain, function, range of motion, and radiographic evaluation. The follow-up period averaged 37 months (range, 24-50 months). The study group had 88% good or excellent results using the HSS score, compared to 90% in the control group. Function and pain improved equally in both groups. The control group had, on average, 14 degrees greater range of motion (115 degrees v. 101 degrees) after arthroplasty. The control group had, on average, posterior inclination of the tibial plateau of 7 degrees before operation and 3 degrees after operation; the corresponding values in the study group were 2 degrees and 1 degree. Using the HSS score and pain and function as parameters, previous osteotomy does not seem to affect the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Conversely, range of motion following arthroplasty appears to be less in those with prior osteotomy. In addition, a high tibial osteotomy may alter the inclination of the tibial plateau.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2584982     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(89)80002-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  26 in total

1.  Wedge volume and osteotomy surface depend on surgical technique for high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Dietrich Pape; Klaus Dueck; Manuel Haag; Olaf Lorbach; Romain Seil; Henning Madry
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthrosis of the knee: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Federico Dettoni; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Filippo Castoldi; Matteo Bruzzone; Davide Blonna; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2010

3.  Flexion gap configuration in total knee arthroplasty following high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; C Lüring; C Perlick; J Grifka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Tibial slope and high tibial osteotomy using the circular external fixator.

Authors:  Taner Gunes; Cengiz Sen; Mehmet Erdem
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Complications of closing wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  James A W Tunggal; Gordon A Higgins; James P Waddell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Results of high tibial osteotomy: review of the literature.

Authors:  Annunziato Amendola; Davide Edoardo Bonasia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  The cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment of medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis in younger patients: a computer model-based evaluation.

Authors:  Joseph F Konopka; Andreas H Gomoll; Thomas S Thornhill; Jeffrey N Katz; Elena Losina
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  History of previous knee surgery does not affect the clinical outcomes of primary total knee arthroplasty in an Asian population.

Authors:  Jason Beng Teck Lim; Bryan Loh; Hwei Chi Chong; Andrew Hwee Chye Tan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-08

9.  Knee joint arthroplasty after tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Luca Amendola; Matteo Fosco; Elisabetta Cenni; Domenico Tigani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. A systematic review.

Authors:  Tom M van Raaij; Max Reijman; Andrea D Furlan; Jan A N Verhaar
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.