Literature DB >> 18370912

Noninvasive quantitative imaging of lymph function in mice.

Sunkuk Kwon1, Eva M Sevick-Muraca.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whereas functional lymph imaging in rodents is imperative for drug discovery of lymph therapeutics, noninvasive imaging of propulsive lymph function in rodents has not been reported previously. Herein, we present a noninvasive and rapid approach to measure lymphatic function in a rodent model using a near-infrared (NIR) dye to minimize background autofluorescence and maximize tissue penetration. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Mice were dynamically imaged following intradermal (i.d.) injection of 2 to 10 microL of 1.3 mM of indocyanine green (IC-Green) into the tail and the limb. Our results demonstrate the ability to image the IC-Green trafficking from the lymph plexus, through lymph vessels and lymphangions, to the ischial nodes in the tail, and to the axillary nodes in the limb. Our results show that lymph flow velocity from the propelled IC-Green "packet" in the lymph vessels in the tail ranged from 1.3 to 3.9 mm/s and the fluorescence intensity peaks repeated on an average of every 51.3 +/- 17.4 seconds in five animals. While pulsatile lymph flow was detected in the deep lymph vessels, lymph propulsion was not visualized in the superficial lymphatic network in the tail. In axillary lymphatic imaging, propulsive lymph flow was also detected. The intensity profile shows that the lymph flow velocity ranged from 0.28 to 1.35 mm/s at a frequency ranging from 0.72 to 11.1 pulses per minute in five animals.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the ability to noninvasively and quantitatively image propulsive lymph flow, which could provide a new method to investigate lymph function and its change in response to potential therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18370912     DOI: 10.1089/lrb.2007.1013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol        ISSN: 1539-6851            Impact factor:   2.589


  54 in total

Review 1.  Preclinical lymphatic imaging.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Gang Niu; Guangming Lu; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Effects of dynamic shear and transmural pressure on wall shear stress sensitivity in collecting lymphatic vessels.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kornuta; Zhanna Nepiyushchikh; Olga Y Gasheva; Anish Mukherjee; David C Zawieja; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Nodal lymph flow quantified with afferent vessel input function allows differentiation between normal and cancer-bearing nodes.

Authors:  Alisha V DSouza; Jonathan T Elliott; Jason R Gunn; Richard J Barth; Kimberley S Samkoe; Kenneth M Tichauer; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 4.  New horizons for imaging lymphatic function.

Authors:  Ruchi Sharma; Juliet A Wendt; John C Rasmussen; Kristen E Adams; Milton V Marshall; Eva M Sevick-Muraca
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Lymphatic abnormalities are associated with RASA1 gene mutations in mouse and man.

Authors:  Patricia E Burrows; Manuel L Gonzalez-Garay; John C Rasmussen; Melissa B Aldrich; Renie Guilliod; Erik A Maus; Caroline E Fife; Sunkuk Kwon; Philip E Lapinski; Philip D King; Eva M Sevick-Muraca
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Lymphedema evaluation using noninvasive 3T MR lymphangiography.

Authors:  Rachelle Crescenzi; Paula M C Donahue; Katherine G Hartley; Aditi A Desai; Allison O Scott; Vaughn Braxton; Helen Mahany; Sarah K Lants; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  Lymphatic imaging in humans with near-infrared fluorescence.

Authors:  John C Rasmussen; I-Chih Tan; Milton V Marshall; Caroline E Fife; Eva M Sevick-Muraca
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 9.740

8.  Minimally invasive method for determining the effective lymphatic pumping pressure in rats using near-infrared imaging.

Authors:  Tyler S Nelson; Ryan E Akin; Michael J Weiler; Timothy Kassis; Jeffrey A Kornuta; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.619

9.  Optical tracer size differences allow quantitation of active pumping rate versus Stokes-Einstein diffusion in lymphatic transport.

Authors:  Alisha V DSouza; Kayla Marra; Jason R Gunn; Kimberley S Samkoe; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 3.170

10.  Non-invasive optical imaging of the lymphatic vasculature of a mouse.

Authors:  Holly A Robinson; SunKuk Kwon; Mary A Hall; John C Rasmussen; Melissa B Aldrich; Eva M Sevick-Muraca
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.