Literature DB >> 26328202

The relationship between histopathology and age factor in patients who were operated for renal masses.

Taha Numan Yıkılmaz1, Okan Baş1, Ali İhsan Arık1, Fatih Hızlı1, Halil Başar1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Renal neoplasms have a predilection to occur in older patients and they are often malignant. They may have different structural characteristics according to age groups. In our study, we have investigated age-related demographic characteristics of the patients who were operated because of suspected malignant renal masses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2010 and 2014, 129 patients were treated surgically for suspected malignant renal masses at our institution. These cases had undergone open radical, open partial, and laparoscopic radical nephrectomies. Patients were divided into two groups based on their ages and evaluated accordingly as Group 1 (≤50 years) and Group 2 (>50 years). Groups were compared based on their clinical and pathological features.
RESULTS: Group 1 and Group 2 consisted of 29 (22.4%) and 91 (77.6%) patients, respectively. The mean age of younger patients was 43.1 years (23-49 years), with a male to female ratio of 19/10, while the average tumor size was 57.6 mm (20-120 mm). Twenty-four patients (83%) had a malignant pathology and five patients (17%) had a benign pathology. Clear cell carcinoma was diagnosed in 67% of the patients in both groups. There was no significant difference with respect to age and tumor size of male and female patients in the younger age group, while younger female adults tended to have a more benign pathology than their male counterparts (40% and 5%, respectively, p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference with respect to gender, tumor size, laterality, and surgical and pathologic features between younger and older patients. An organ- sparing approach should be strongly considered when treatment for renal tumors in young females is performed because of a potentially higher incidence of a benign pathology of renal masses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; benign pathology; kidney tumor; nephrectomy; renal mass; younger patients

Year:  2015        PMID: 26328202      PMCID: PMC4548664          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2015.54521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  15 in total

1.  Validation of the 2009 TNM version in a large multi-institutional cohort of patients treated for renal cell carcinoma: are further improvements needed?

Authors:  Giacomo Novara; Vincenzo Ficarra; Alessandro Antonelli; Walter Artibani; Roberto Bertini; Marco Carini; Sergio Cosciani Cunico; Ciro Imbimbo; Nicola Longo; Guido Martignoni; Giuseppe Martorana; Andrea Minervini; Vincenzo Mirone; Francesco Montorsi; Riccardo Schiavina; Roberto Schiavina; Claudio Simeone; Sergio Serni; Alchiede Simonato; Salvatore Siracusano; Alessandro Volpe; Giorgio Carmignani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Current TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma evaluated: revising stage T3a.

Authors:  S Siemer; J Lehmann; A Loch; F Becker; U Stein; G Schneider; M Ziegler; M Stöckle
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Renal neoplasms in younger adults: analysis of 112 tumors from a single institution according to the new 2004 World Health Organization classification and 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System.

Authors:  Ying Cao; Gladell P Paner; Kent T Perry; Robert C Flanigan; Steven C Campbell; Maria M Picken
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.534

4.  Sporadic renal cell carcinoma in young adults: presentation, treatment, and outcome.

Authors:  Hazem I Abou El Fettouh; Edward E Cherullo; Mohamed El-Jack; Youssef Al Maslamani; Andrew C Novick
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Renal cell carcinomas in children and young adults: increased incidence of papillary architecture and unique subtypes.

Authors:  A A Renshaw; S R Granter; J A Fletcher; H P Kozakewich; C L Corless; A R Perez-Atayde
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 6.  Renal cell carcinoma in young adults: incidence, disease outcome and review of the literature.

Authors:  Alejandro Rodríguez; Jean-Jacques Patard; Bernard Lobel
Journal:  Arch Esp Urol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 0.436

7.  Comparison of presentation and outcome for patients 18 to 40 and 60 to 70 years old with solid renal masses.

Authors:  Michael D Gillett; John C Cheville; R Jeffrey Karnes; Christine M Lohse; Eugene D Kwon; Bradley C Leibovich; Horst Zincke; Michael L Blute
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Outcome of renal tumors in young adults.

Authors:  S Siemer; M Hack; J Lehmann; F Becker; M Stöckle
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Young age is an independent prognostic factor for survival of sporadic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ricardo F Sánchez-Ortiz; Charles J Rosser; Lydia T Madsen; David A Swanson; Christopher G Wood
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Clinical efficacy of radical nephrectomy versus nephron-sparing surgery on localized renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Wentao Li; Yanlei Cheng; Yi Cheng; Hui Ren; Na Han
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.175

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.