Literature DB >> 15794671

Renal neoplasms in younger adults: analysis of 112 tumors from a single institution according to the new 2004 World Health Organization classification and 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System.

Ying Cao1, Gladell P Paner, Kent T Perry, Robert C Flanigan, Steven C Campbell, Maria M Picken.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Adult renal neoplasms have a predilection for older patients and are clinically and morphologically distinct from renal neoplasms found in pediatric age groups. Relatively rare tumors occur in younger adults (18-45 years of age). Whether these renal tumors are morphologically and clinically distinct from those of older adults has been the subject of controversy. Recent modification of the World Health Organization histologic classification and the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system of adult renal tumors further highlighted the need for case analysis in this age group.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze renal tumors in younger adults based on a large surgical series from a single institution.
DESIGN: Of 780 renal mass nephrectomy (partial, total, or radical) specimens that were available for evaluation and had been obtained between 1986 and 2004 at Loyola University Medical Center, 112 specimens were from patients between 18 and 45 years of age. The tumors were reevaluated according to the 2004 World Health Organization classification and the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system.
RESULTS: The likelihood of clear cell renal cell carcinoma was significantly reduced from 65% in older adults to 53% in younger adults (18-45 years, P = .04). The reduction trend was more significant when comparing an even younger age group. The majority (64%) of clear cell renal cell carcinoma in younger adults was low stage, T1a. Seventeen percent of these tumors had multilocular cystic features involving more than 50% of the tumor volume (55%-85%). The number of oncocytomas was also significantly lower in younger adults than in older adults (2% vs 11%, P < .001), and this presumably age-related benign neoplasm was not identified in patients younger than 40 years in this study. In contrast, the miscellaneous tumor category showed a remarkable increase, from 4% in older adults to 26% in younger adults (P < .001). The youngest patient group (18-35 years) had a higher incidence of miscellaneous tumors, 37%. Younger female adults tended to have more benign miscellaneous neoplasms than did their male counterparts (64% vs 36%, P < .001). Clear cell and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma occurred more frequently in younger male adults than in female adults (2:1 and 8:1, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Renal neoplasms are more heterogeneous in younger adults and have a different distribution pattern compared with that in older adults. Malignant and benign renal neoplasms tend to have a contrasting sex distribution in younger adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15794671     DOI: 10.5858/2005-129-487-RNIYAA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  13 in total

Review 1.  Systemic therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in older adults.

Authors:  Sumanta K Pal; Ari Vanderwalde; Arti Hurria; Robert A Figlin
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Histopathology of surgically treated renal tumours in young adults: a developing country perspective.

Authors:  Muhammed Mubarak; Javed I Kazi; Rehan Mohsin; Altaf Hashmi; Syed Ali Anwer Naqvi; Syed Adeeb Ul Hassan Rizvi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 3.  Risk factors, classification, and staging of renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Damian A Laber
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Molecular-genetic analysis is essential for accurate classification of renal carcinoma resembling Xp11.2 translocation carcinoma.

Authors:  Malcolm Hayes; Kvetoslava Peckova; Petr Martinek; Milan Hora; Kristyna Kalusova; Lubomir Straka; Ondrej Daum; Bohuslava Kokoskova; Pavla Rotterova; Kristyna Pivovarčikova; Jindrich Branzovsky; Magdalena Dubova; Pavla Vesela; Michal Michal; Ondrej Hes
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 5.  Renal cell carcinoma in young patients: a review of recent literature.

Authors:  Michael Daugherty; Gennady Bratslavsky
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  High FOXM1 expression was associated with bladder carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Dongye Liu; Zhe Zhang; Chui-ze Kong
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-01-17

7.  Clinicopathologic features of renal cell carcinoma in young adults: a comparison study with renal cell carcinoma in older patients.

Authors:  Jae Hee Suh; Tina Oak; Jae Y Ro; Luan D Truong; Alberto G Ayala; Steven S Shen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-01-30

8.  The relationship between histopathology and age factor in patients who were operated for renal masses.

Authors:  Taha Numan Yıkılmaz; Okan Baş; Ali İhsan Arık; Fatih Hızlı; Halil Başar
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-06

9.  Thyroid follicular carcinoma-like renal tumor: a case report with morphologic, immunophenotypic, cytogenetic, and scintigraphic studies.

Authors:  William Sterlacci; Sterlacci William; Irmgard Verdorfer; Verdorfer Irmgard; Michael Gabriel; Gabriel Michael; Gregor Mikuz; Mikuz Gregor
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2007-08-18       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 10.  MRI phenotype in renal cancer: is it clinically relevant?

Authors:  Naomi Campbell; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.