Literature DB >> 15592020

Current TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma evaluated: revising stage T3a.

S Siemer1, J Lehmann, A Loch, F Becker, U Stein, G Schneider, M Ziegler, M Stöckle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: : Recent studies of rare cases of pT3a renal cell carcinoma extending directly into the adrenal gland showed worse survival than in other pT3a cases and recategorization as stage pT4 was suggested. We assessed the prognostic validity of a stage pT3a diagnosis based on perirenal fat infiltration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: : The records of 1,794 patients with renal cell carcinoma who underwent surgical resection between 1975 and 2000 at our institution were analyzed retrospectively. Focusing on pT3a tumors, as defined by perirenal fat infiltration, numerous clinical and histopathological parameters were investigated by univariate and multivariate statistical methods with cancer specific survival as the primary end point.
RESULTS: : We identified 237 of 1,794 patients with perirenal fat infiltration, classified as having pT3a disease. In patients with pT3a tumors tumor size was a significant parameter predicting survival. The most significant cutoff value for tumor size in pT3a disease was 7 cm. Patients with distant metastasis had a worse prognosis independent of T classification. Therefore, to assess the prognostic value of the current T classification in regard to T3a tumors we excluded patients with tumor stage cM+ for further subgroup analysis. Survival comparison of pT1 pNall, cM0 (744 of 1,794 cases) and pT3a pNall, cM0 7 cm or less (100 of 237) as well as pT2 pNall, cM0 (265 of 1,794) and pT3a pNall, cM0 greater than 7 cm (93 of 237) yielded similar results. After splitting pT3a into a modified T1/T2 classification a significant difference in 5-year survival analysis for a modified T1/T2 stage was found (pT1 plus pT3a less than 7 cm 90% vs pT2 plus pT3a greater than 7 cm 73%, p <0.001). Subsequently multivariate analysis in all 1,794 patients showed that modified T stage was an independent significant predictor of cancer specific survival.
CONCLUSIONS: : We suggest revising the current pT3a classification based on perirenal fat infiltration but rendering a modified pT1/pT2 classification, which resolves pT3a cases without the loss of prognostic validity. Perirenal fat infiltration should not be used to assign T category. Tumors directly infiltrating the adrenal gland should be reclassified as T4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15592020     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000146719.43269.e8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  20 in total

1.  [Renal cell carcinoma].

Authors:  A Haferkamp; D Rohde; S C Müller; H Rübben; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Use of the University of California Los Angeles Integrated Staging System (UISS) to predict survival in localized renal cell carcinoma in an Asian population.

Authors:  Chi-Fai Ng; Siu-Ho Wan; Annie Wong; Fernand M M Lai; Pun Hui; Chi-Wai Cheng
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Early renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Yoshihiko Tomita
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Risk factors, classification, and staging of renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Damian A Laber
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  The relationship between histopathology and age factor in patients who were operated for renal masses.

Authors:  Taha Numan Yıkılmaz; Okan Baş; Ali İhsan Arık; Fatih Hızlı; Halil Başar
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-06

6.  Prognostic significance of perirenal infiltration in renal cell carcinoma (<7 cm).

Authors:  Seongyub Oh; Jangho Yoon; Dongil Kang; Heung Lae Cho; Jae-il Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 7.  Long-term outcomes of the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  John S Lam; Arie S Belldegrun; Allan J Pantuck
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Approach to the small renal mass: weighing treatment options.

Authors:  Brian M Benway; Sam B Bhayani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  The importance of histology and cytogenetics in decision making for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Julia G Garcia; Maria M Picken; Robert C Flanigan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Staging of renal cell carcinoma: Current concepts.

Authors:  John S Lam; Tobias Klatte; Alberto Breda
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.