Literature DB >> 26316390

Functional Restoration of gp91phox-Oxidase Activity by BAC Transgenesis and Gene Targeting in X-linked Chronic Granulomatous Disease iPSCs.

Magdalena Laugsch1, Maria Rostovskaya2, Sergiy Velychko2, Cornelia Richter1, Ariane Zimmer1, Barbara Klink3, Evelin Schröck3, Michael Haase4, Katrin Neumann2, Sebastian Thieme1, Joachim Roesler1, Sebastian Brenner1, Konstantinos Anastassiadis2.   

Abstract

Chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) is an inherited immunodeficiency, caused by the inability of neutrophils to produce functional NADPH oxidase required for fighting microbial infections. The X-linked form of CGD (X-CGD), which is due to mutations in the CYBB (gp91phox) gene, a component of NADPH oxidase, accounts for about two-thirds of CGD cases. We derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from X-CGD patient keratinocytes using a Flp recombinase excisable lentiviral reprogramming vector. For restoring gp91phox function, we applied two strategies: transposon-mediated bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) transgenesis and gene targeting using vectors with a fixed 5' homology arm (HA) of 8 kb and 3'HA varying in size from 30 to 80 kb. High efficiency of homologous recombination (up to 22%) was observed with increased size of the 3'HA. Both, BAC transgenesis and gene targeting resulted in functional restoration of the gp91phox measured by an oxidase activity assay in X-CGD iPSCs differentiated into the myeloid lineage. In conclusion, we delivered an important milestone towards the use of genetically corrected autologous cells for the treatment of X-CGD and monogenic diseases in general.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26316390      PMCID: PMC4886927          DOI: 10.1038/mt.2015.154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ther        ISSN: 1525-0016            Impact factor:   11.454


Introduction

Chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) is a rare heritable disorder that affects 1 in 250,000 individuals.[1] Patients with CGD suffer from severe infections and deregulated inflammation, both often associated with granuloma formation.[2] After phagocytosis of pathogens by neutrophils, the multienzyme NADPH oxidase complex normally generates reactive oxygen species, which are indispensible for effective killing of certain opportunistic pathogens such as Aspergillus spp. and Staphylococcus aureus. Mutations in any of the five genes (CYBB, gp91phox; CYBA, p22phox; NCF1, p47phox; NCF2, p67phox; and NCF4, p40phox), all encoding components of the NADPH oxidase complex, lead to reduced or abolished function of this enzyme. The X-linked form of CGD (X-CGD) is caused by mutations in the Xp21.1-located gene CYBB coding for gp91phox (91-kDa subunit of the phagocyte oxidase) and accounts for two-thirds of CGD cases. Mutations in the CYBB gene are scattered in exons but also in other genomic regions including promoter, introns, and splice sites.[3,4,5,6,7] Mutations in exonic regions include deletions or insertions causing frameshifts and nonsense and missense substitutions. Most of the mutations result in absence of gp91phox expression (X910). While the outcome of human leukocyte antigen–matched allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning regimens for CGD patients has improved considerably, for many patients, a suitable donor is missing.[8] Because only a small fraction of circulating neutrophils (less than 10%) with normal gp91phox levels is enough to fight microbial infections, treatment of CGD by gene therapy holds great promise.[9] Initial attempts to treat X-CGD using gamma-retroviral vectors did not exceed the 0.2% long-term gene marking, and later trials with preconditioning of the bone marrow did not result in significant long-term engraftment of gene-corrected cells without side effects.[10] Unfortunately, the classical pitfalls associated with retroviral-mediated gene therapy, such as insertional transactivation of proto-oncogenes with clonal expansion, prevailed and led to undesired outcomes.[11,12,13,14] This stimulated the development of safer alternatives based on self-inactivating retroviral or lentiviral vectors.[15] The advent of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) opened new therapeutic concepts for the treatment of monogenic diseases. Patient-specific iPSCs can be derived from various somatic cell types, expanded, and genetically manipulated without losing their potential to differentiate into various lineages.[16,17] By these means, it is conceivable to transplant autologous differentiated cells produced from genetically corrected iPSCs back to the patient. So far, iPSCs have been generated from different forms of CGD, including X-CGD and could be successfully differentiated in vitro into neutrophils and macrophages.[18,19,20,21] Currently, there are two strategies to compensate for loss of gene function caused by a mutation in human pluripotent stem cells. The first strategy aims at the correction of the mutation by homologous recombination and has been successfully applied in different types of disease-specific iPSCs, including beta-thalassemia, laminopathy, and gyrate atrophy.[16,17,22] The second strategy entangles the targeted insertion of a normal copy of the affected gene into a “safe harbor” locus, such as AAVS1, the genomic site of adeno-associated virus type 2 integration.[23,24] So far, the NADPH oxidase activity in X-CGD neutrophils produced from iPSCs has been restored by zinc-finger nuclease–mediated targeting of the CYBB minigene into a “safe harbor” locus.[18,21] However, this strategy does not guarantee long-term physiological levels of gp91phox expression because a constitutive heterologous promoter regulates the CYBB minigene. Myeloid-specific promoters similar to the ones used in viral vectors for restoring gp91phox expression in iPSCs generated from a mouse model of X-CGD[25] or for transducing HSCs from X-CGD patients[26] represent promising alternatives. Here, we describe the restoration of the NADPH oxidase activity in X-CGD patient iPSCs by two different genetic approaches: (i) transposon-mediated integration of a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) vector carrying the genomic region of the CYBB gene and (ii) by correcting the X-CGD–causing mutation in the CYBB gene via homologous recombination. With both approaches, we could show that the genetically manipulated cells were functionally corrected and NADPH oxidase activity was restored after differentiation into neutrophils.

Results

Derivation of X-CGD iPSCs

We isolated keratinocytes from plucked hair of a patient with X-CGD (X910) carrying a double mutation c.958delG and c.962T > G in exon 9 of the CYBB gene. For the generation of iPSCs, we transduced keratinocytes with the LV-OKSM-Tomato vector, which contains the four reprogramming factors (OCT4, KLF4, SOX2, and c-MYC separated by 2A peptides) (,). Two stable iPSC clones from this patient were chosen for further validation (S22 and J14). Southern blot analysis showed that clone S22 contained three and clone J14 two lentiviral integrations (). Cytokeratin-14 (K14), which marks primary keratinocytes, was not detectable in iPSCs (Supplementary Figure S1a) and the expression of the exogenous reprogramming factors was silenced (Supplementary Figure S1b). Both clones expressed endogenous pluripotency-associated genes (,) and markers (SSEA-3, SSEA-4, TRA-1–60, TRA-1–81) and did not express the differentiation-associated glycoprotein SSEA-1 (). To test the in vivo differentiation potential of the iPSC clones, we performed teratoma assays by injecting cells intramuscularly into immunodeficient mice. Histological analysis of teratoma sections revealed the presence of cells of all three germ layers (endoderm, mesoderm, and ectoderm; ). The above results confirm the establishment of iPSCs from keratinocytes of X-CGD patients.

Compensation of the gp91phox deficiency by BAC transposition

As a first approach for restoring the gp91phox deficiency, we transfected a BAC containing the CYBB gene into the X-CGD iPSCs. To guarantee a single-copy, full-length BAC integration into the genome, we used the BAC transposition method, which was pioneered previously in our lab.[27] For this, we retrofitted the BAC bacterial backbone with piggyBac (PB) inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) using recombineering technology. On one side of the bacterial backbone, we inserted the PB3 ITR together with a blasticidin resistance gene driven by the Ubiquitin-C promoter. On the other side, we inserted the PB5 ITR together with the ampicillin resistance gene and the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-TK) gene driven by the HSV promoter for negative selection (). The modified BACs were transfected together with the hyperactive version of the PB transposase (hyPBase) by lipofection into human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) for testing transgenesis efficiency and then into X-CGD iPSCs. Blasticidin-resistant colonies were screened by PCR for transposition events as described previously.[27] Upon transposition, the BAC integrates as a single copy, extending from PB3 ITR to PB5 ITR and excluding the bacterial backbone (). We detected transposition events in both iPSC clones (S22 and J14) and in one clone (S22), transposition efficiency was comparable to the H7.S6 hESC line (). We identified the genomic integration site of the BAC in 12 out of 15 clones analyzed by Splinkerette PCR from both sides. BAC integrations were randomly distributed across the genome (), being both in intragenic and intergenic regions (Supplementary Table S1). Moreover, all sites revealed the consensus motif (TTAA) of PB integration (). In three of the clones (#5, #6, and #21), we also confirmed the integration of the BAC in the long arms of chromosome 2, 1, and 8, respectively, by fluorescence in situ hybridization. A representative fluorescence in situ hybridization for clone #5 is shown in . Conventional cytogenetic analysis (G-banding) displayed an apparently normal male karyotype (46,XY) in all three clones.

Correction of the X-CGD–causing mutation by gene targeting

As a second approach, we aimed to correct the X-CGD–causing mutation by gene targeting in iPSCs. The CYBB gene is not expressed in human pluripotent stem cells (assayed by reverse transcription–PCR; data not shown), therefore we used a promoter-driven selection strategy for targeting. First, we inserted in the CYBB-containing BAC a PGK-neo-pA selection cassette flanked by FRT sites in intron 8, in a position that does not interfere with splicing and which is close to the mutations found in exon 9 of the gene in this patient. Then we subcloned from the BAC a targeting vector with short homology arms (HAs) (2.7-kb 5′HA and 1.7-kb 3′HA) using recombineering technology. We tested the targeting efficiency in H7.S6 hESCs but could not obtain any correct targeted events out of 168 screened colonies (data not shown). Consequently, we changed our targeting strategy and trimmed the modified BAC containing the PGK-neo-pA cassette from the 5′ end and obtained a targeting vector that has a short 5′HA (8 kb). The maximal length of the 3′HA from the downstream FRT site until the end of the genomic fragment in the BAC is 80 kb. Using single restriction sites in the 3′ region, we could shorten the length of the 3′HA to 54 kb (SbfI) and to 32 kb (SalI), respectively. This strategy allowed the use of a 5′ external probe for detecting correct targeting events by Southern blot (). We tested the BAC-based targeting vector in H7.S6 hESCs and experienced an increase in targeting frequency with longer 3′HAs (). Consequently, we decided to use the version with the longer 3′HA (80 kb) for targeting the iPSC clones. We confirmed correct targeting by Southern blot () and detected relatively high targeting frequencies (5 and 22% in two clones) for a gene that is not expressed in human pluripotent stem cells ().

Removal of the selection cassette and of the reprogramming vectors by Flp-mediated recombination

The lentiviral vector used for reprogramming of the patient keratinocytes into iPSCs and the selection cassette (PGK-neo-pA) of our BAC-based targeting vector are both flanked by FRT sites. Hence, we aimed at excising the reprogramming vector and the selection cassette in the targeted clones simultaneously by lipofection of a codon-optimized Flp recombinase (Flpo) expression plasmid.[28] To confirm excision, we screened the transfected clone (S22 #77) by Southern blot and for sensitivity to G418. As expected upon Flp-mediated excision of the selection cassette, the targeted band (11.6 kb—ApaLI digestion with 5′ external probe) shifted to the same size as the wild-type band (, upper blot). Surprisingly, in 56 out of 94 screened colonies (59.6%), we detected simultaneous excision of the selection cassette and all three copies of the reprogramming vector (, middle blot; BsrGI digestion with PRE lentiviral probe). In 2 colonies out of 94, we detected either excision of the selection cassette or of the reprogramming vector only (Supplementary Figure S2). All colonies that excised the selection cassette also lost resistance to G418. To show that the absence of signal is not due to absence of DNA in the respective lanes, we hybridized the membrane in which the genomic DNA was digested by BsrGI with the 5′ external probe (, lower blot). Finally, to confirm that our gene targeting approach corrected the mutation, we PCR-amplified a region surrounding the mutation and sequenced it. In all targeted and Flp-recombined clones, we confirmed the correction of the X-CGD–causing mutation () (and also the presence of the single FRT site; Supplementary Figure S3a,b). Conventional cytogenetics (G-banding) of one correctly targeted and Flp-recombined clone revealed a normal male karyotype (46,XY), which was further confirmed by spectral karyotyping analysis.[29] No recurrent structural (in particular, no translocations) or numerical aberrations were observed ( and Supplementary Figure S3c).

Restoration of the NADPH oxidase activity in iPSC-differentiated neutrophils

To confirm functional restoration of the oxidase activity in the corrected X-CGD iPSCs, we performed differentiation into the myeloid lineage (). To monitor the differentiation efficiency into the hematopoietic lineage, we analyzed the cells for expression of CD34 and CD45 between days 18 and 20. As a positive control, we used human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells from healthy donors. We detected high levels of CD34/CD45 expression (40–50% double-positive cells) in both patient X-CGD iPSCs and those carrying the BAC transgene (). For terminal differentiation, the cells were further cultured on OP9 feeder cells in differentiation medium III for 8–10 days until suspension cells appeared, followed by culture in medium supplemented with G-CSF for additional 18–24 days. At this stage, the differentiated cells were assayed for the expression of CD45 and CD13, a marker for the myeloid lineage. We detected high levels of CD13 (>90%) expression in the differentiated iPSCs, confirming the efficiency of our differentiation protocol (). We also monitored the expression of CD10, CD31, and CD123 (IL-3 receptor) at days 20 and 49 of iPSC differentiation. The expression of CD31 and CD123 was maintained at day 49 of differentiation, whereas expression of the lymphoid precursor–specific marker CD10 was lost (Supplementary Figure S4a). To see whether the X-CGD patient's iPSCs carrying the transgenic BAC have restored gp91phox expression, we analyzed the cells by flow cytometry. As expected, we did not detect gp91phox expression in granulocytes isolated from the X-CGD patient, confirming that the c.958delG and c.962T > G mutations lead to complete loss of the protein (X910). In contrast, the patient's differentiated iPSCs carrying the BAC transgene and the ones corrected by targeting expressed high levels of gp91phox ( and Supplementary Figure S4b). As expected, the corrected iPSCs expressed gp91phox after differentiation into myeloid cells (day 43) but not before (day 16) (Supplementary Figure S4b). To further test whether the restored gp91phox expression is also functional, we performed an oxidase activity assay based on chemiluminescence. As expected, the X-CGD patient granulocytes did not show any oxidase activity as compared to healthy donor granulocytes, which produced superoxide in a cell-number–dependent manner (). Importantly, the oxidase activity in X-CGD iPSCs was also restored by the BAC transgene to levels comparable to the in vitro differentiated normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (). Physiological levels of NADPH oxidase activity were also detected in the differentiated X-CGD iPSCs in which the mutation was corrected by gene targeting and the selection cassette together with the reprogramming vectors had been removed by Flp recombination (). We have also analyzed the colony-forming unit potential of the differentiated patient's iPSCs and of one BAC transgenic and one targeted iPSC clone. We only obtained granulocyte macrophage megakaryocyte (GMM) colonies, which in the case of the corrected cells showed reactive oxygen species activity as determined by nitroblue tetrazolium staining after phorbol myristate acetate stimulation (Supplementary Figure S5a). We next asked the question how many of the BAC transgenic iPSC clones were functional. We chose six BAC transgenic clones with intergenic integrations and performed nitroblue tetrazolium assay after differentiation into granulocytes. All clones that showed efficient differentiation to granulocytes (four out of six BAC transgenic and also five out of six targeted) were positive in nitroblue tetrazolium assay, whereas the patient cells were not (Supplementary Figure S5b,c).

Discussion

In this study, we describe the derivation of iPSCs from a male patient with X-CGD and the subsequent restoration of the NADPH oxidase deficiency by BAC transgenesis or by homologous recombination–mediated correction of the mutation. The efficiency of iPSCs generation depends on the differentiation state of the somatic cell type and on the reprogramming protocol.[30] Here, we applied a noninvasive method by isolating keratinocytes from plucked hair of the patient to avoid any disease-related complications such as disturbed wound healing that could arise after skin biopsies in the CGD patient. An important prerequisite for using iPSCs in therapeutic applications is reprogramming by integration-free methods. This can be achieved by episomal vectors, by nonintegrating viral vectors and by mRNA transfection or protein transduction of the reprogramming factors, albeit with low efficiency.[31] An alternative to the above-mentioned methods is to transfect the cells with excisable vectors, which are either flanked by site-specific recombination target sites or transposon ITRs.[32] Our initial attempts to reprogram keratinocytes using the PB transposon vector containing the four reprogramming factors resulted in unstable iPSC colonies, which did not completely silence the exogenous factors (data not shown). Therefore, we decided to use a Flp recombinase excisable lentiviral vector and derived iPSCs in which the exogenous reprogramming factors were silenced and successfully removed. For restoration of the gp91phox activity in X-CGD iPSCs, we applied two strategies: BAC transgenesis and gene targeting by homologous recombination. In contrast to viral vectors in which either constitutively active heterologous promoters or myeloid-specific promoters express cDNAs, BACs depending on their size contain most of the regulatory sequences of the gene of interest and thus most likely provide physiological expression levels. Furthermore, transposon-mediated BAC transgenesis results in most of the cases in full-length, single-copy integrations.[27] The genomic integration site can be easily determined by Splinkerette PCR or other similar methods and thus allowing selection of clones in which BAC integration is most likely not mutagenic. However, to exclude that the BAC insertion is not mutagenic, transplantation of the differentiated cells into surrogate models in vivo is necessary. Moreover, BAC transgenesis can be universally applied to correct gp91phox deficiency irrespective of the underlying CYBB mutation. Nonetheless, depending on the site of genomic integration, BACs may also be prone to silencing and therefore long-term monitoring of the expression level of the gene of interest in the transfected cells is required. An alternative to BAC transgenesis is the correction of the genetic mutation by homologous recombination. However, the efficiency of gene targeting via homologous recombination in human pluripotent stem cells using classical nonviral vectors is low as compared to their mouse counterparts.[33] Targeting frequencies are improved by using helper-dependent adenoviral (HdAVs) or adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors,[16,34] BAC-based vectors,[17,35] and engineered nucleases.[24,36] HdAVs and BAC vectors carry long HAs, a parameter that influences positively the targeting efficiency. Targeting of the CYBB locus, which is not expressed in pluripotent cells with vectors containing short HAs, was not feasible. Also, a 3′HA of 32 kb was not sufficient for homologous recombination in the CYBB locus. By extending the 3′HA to 54 kb, we were able to detect homologous recombination events with an efficiency of 2.1% in hESCs, which was further increased to 8.7% with a 3′HA of 80 kb. This increase in homologous recombination efficiency can be due to the existence of open chromatin in the downstream genomic region. Indeed, 23 kb downstream of the last CYBB exon (33 kb from the end of the selection cassette) lies the last exon of the dynein light chain 3 (DYNLT3) gene, which is transcribed from the reverse strand and is expressed in hESCs (ENCODE database[37]). The promoter region of DYNLT3 is located more than 34 kb downstream of the last CYBB exon (43 kb from the selection cassette), implying that the 3′HA of 32 kb is not reaching this region. Our targeting strategy is not relying on the use of engineered nucleases which can increase targeting frequencies but can also generate new mutations due to off-target cleavage.[38] Another advantage of targeting vectors with long HAs is that they can be universally applied to correct other patient-specific mutations dispersed along the gene. The single FRT site left in the intronic sequence after Flp recombination did not interfere with CYBB gene expression, because the corrected cells showed functional gp91phox activity. Nevertheless, residual site-specific recombination target sites can disrupt regulatory elements, as was the case where insertion of a loxP/FRT site in the third intron of Tnr gene altered the expression of the neighboring gene Gas5.[39] Therefore, a safer alternative is the use of selection cassettes flanked by ITRs of the PB transposon, which can be seamlessly excised after transfection of the transposase.[40] Although we show that correction of the X-CGD–causing mutation by homologous recombination in iPSCs and their subsequent differentiation to functional neutrophils is feasible, there is still a long way to go before employing this strategy for cell-based therapy. The reprogramming process and also the prolonged expansion required for the genetic manipulation of the iPSCs in culture may lead to the accumulation of new mutations,[41] some of which could lead to malignancies. Interestingly, Howden et al.[17] identified several mutations in iPSCs reprogrammed by episomal vectors as compared to the parental somatic cells, but the accumulation of new mutations by the subsequent expansion of the cells for gene targeting and excision of the selection cassette was minimal. Although the X-CGD–corrected iPSC clones were karyotypically normal in our study, a more careful in-depth analysis of their genomic integrity is required before using these cells for future therapeutic applications. In vivo testing in animal models will allow long-term assessment of the risk imposed by potential novel mutations acquired during iPSC generation and the risk of tumorigenesis by pluripotent cell contamination in the differentiated graft. A further prerequisite for the utility of genetically corrected disease-specific iPSCs in future therapeutic applications is their capacity to efficiently differentiate into the required cell type. Various differentiation protocols into the hematopoietic lineage have been established using hESCs.[42,43,44,45,46,47] However, iPSCs retain an epigenetic memory of their cell type of origin, which can compromise the differentiation efficiency into certain lineages.[48] We derived iPSCs from keratinocytes, which are of ectodermal origin and could show that they can be differentiated into the hematopoietic lineage. Using our modified differentiation media, we were able to achieve a yet unprecedented high percentage of CD34+CD45+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells from iPSCs. These cells demonstrated colony-forming unit potential and gave rise to myeloid cells in suspension cultures. However, we also experienced that not all iPSC clones could be efficiently differentiated into granulocytes. It has previously been reported that hematopoietic cells derived from X-GCD patients mimic the CGD.[18,19,20] Indeed, our iPSC-derived X-CGD neutrophils displayed complete oxidase deficiency as suggested from the initial analyses of the native X-CGD donor neutrophils that did not show any gp91phox expression nor oxidase function. Restoration of the gp91phox deficiency with both the BAC and homologous recombination approach resulted in a strong oxidase activity, comparable to that of peripheral blood granulocytes from a healthy donor. This high level of functional correction is due to the native promoter and enhancer elements leading to physiological levels of gp91phox expression. For future X-CGD gene therapy studies, the level of gp91phox expression per cell is crucial for therapeutic success, since the efficiency on eliminating pathogens depends on both, the ratio of engrafted corrected HSCs compared to the total number of resident HSCs and to the efficacy of each neutrophil to produce reactive oxygen species. Methods to generate readily transplantable HSCs have to be established to enable routine testing of the efficacy and safety of differentiated iPSCs in vivo. There are conflicting results about engraftment of iPSCs-derived HSCs. While Wang et al.[22] successfully report intraosseous injection and Hanna et al.[49] used intravenous transplantation of corrected hematopoietic cells into mice, most of other groups have not been able to achieve bone marrow reconstitution from iPSCs-derived hematopoietic cells, unless they used alternative techniques such as derivation of HSCs through teratoma formation.[44] In vivo testing in animal models will allow long-term assessment of the risk imposed by potential novel mutations acquired during iPSC generation and the risk of tumorigenesis by pluripotent cell contamination in the differentiated graft. In conclusion, we established a universal method for efficient correction of any mutation in the CYBB gene in X-CGD iPSCs by homologous recombination and BAC transgenesis. After differentiation into neutrophils, the repaired cells restored the capacity to produce physiological levels of oxidase activity.

Materials and Methods

Outgrowths of keratinocytes from the X-CGD patient's hair carrying the deletion c.958delG and the substitution c.962T > G in exon 9, classified as X910, were done as previously described.[50] The use of human material in this study is approved by the ethics committee of the Technische Universität Dresden (EK 99032010) and is in compliance with the guidelines of the Federal Government of Germany and the Declaration of Helsinki concerning Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. The pRRL.PPT.SF.hOct34.hKlf4.hSox2.hcmyc.i2dTomato.pre (LV-OKSM-Tomato) vector containing human reprogramming factors—OCT4, KLF4, SOX2, and c-MYC—was kindly donated by Axel Schambach (MHH, Universität Hannover).[51] Virus vector particle production was performed as previously described.[52] Human keratinocytes from X-CGD patient were cultured on Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Brussels, Belgium) for 2–3 days before and 3–4 days after lentiviral vector transduction in Keratinocyte Growth Medium 2 (PromoCell, Heidelberg, Germany). Thereafter, the cells were cultured in mTeSR1 (Stem Cell Technologies, Cologne, Germany) with daily medium change until colonies appeared. The iPSCs were validated by immunostaining and quantitative reverse transcription–PCR for the expression of pluripotency-associated genes and by teratoma formation assays. All BAC modifications and the subsequent generation of targeting vectors were done using recombineering technology.[53] Detailed information is presented in Supplementary Materials and Methods. Oligonucleotides were purchased from Biomers (Ulm, Germany) and are listed in Supplementary Table S2. PB transposase expression vector (hyPBase), a kind gift from Alan Bradley, Sanger Institute, UK[54] and BAC co-lipofection was performed as previously described.[27] Positive selection with 2 µg/ml blasticidin (Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany) and negative selection with 200 nmol/l FIAU (Fialuridine; Moravek Biochemicals, Brea, CA) started 2 and 6 days after transfection, respectively. Colonies were picked after 2 weeks, expanded, and screened by PCR for transposition events. The BAC integration sites were determined using Splinkerette PCR and sequencing as already described.[27,55] For electroporation, plasmid DNA or trimmed BAC were linearized, purified by phenolchloroform extraction, and dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline. About 3 × 106 cells were electroporated in 750 µl culture medium with 25 µg DNA at 320 V and 250 µF using a Biorad Gene Pulser. Selection with 100 µg/ml G418 started 2 days after transfection and after 2 weeks, resistant colonies were picked, expanded, and screened by Southern blot. G-banding and spectral karyotyping analysis was performed as described previously.[29] Metaphase chromosomes were hybridized with a self-made spectral karyotyping hybridization probe cocktail for human chromosomes as described.[56] For fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of the integration site, the CYBB BAC was labeled via nick translation using tetramethyl-rhodamine-5-dUTP (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and hybridized on chromosome spreads together with a commercial probe targeting the centromere of chromosome X labeled in green (DXZ1; Kreatech, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). In vitro For the in vitro differentiation of hiPSCs into the hematopoietic lineage, we adapted the protocol provided by Stem Cell Technologies based on Ng et al.[46] and Chadwick et al.[45] with small modifications. Detailed composition of the differentiation media are found in Supplementary Materials and Methods. In brief, cells were incubated with differentiation medium I and after 4–5 days with differentiation medium II. Between days 18 and 20, cells were analyzed for expression of hematopoietic markers (CD34/CD45). For further differentiation, we followed the protocol published by Yokoyama et al.[47] with slight modifications. Cells were dissociated and replated on Mitomycin-C (Sigma-Aldrich, Schnelldorf, Germany) inactivated OP9 cells in differentiation medium III. From day 28 to 30 onwards, the cells were cultured with 50 ng/ml G-CSF (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) in RPMI medium (PAA, Cölbe, Germany). Between days 43 and 44, cells were analyzed by flow cytometry for expression of CD13 and gp91phox as well as for oxidase activity. Freshly isolated normal or X-CGD neutrophils, differentiated normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells as well as in vitro differentiated patient-specific and genetically corrected iPSCs were stimulated with phorbol myristate acetate and analyzed for superoxide production by chemiluminescence using the Diogenes kit (National Diagnostics, Atlanta, GA) according to the manufacturers instructions. About 1 × 104 to 1 × 105 cells were placed into a 96-well plate and the response was measured sequentially on a Mithras LB940 (Berthold, Bad Wildbad, Germany). Figure S1. Expression of K14 and exogenous reprogramming factors in iPSCs. Figure S2. Flp-mediated excision of the selection cassette and lentiviral integrations. Figure S3. Confirmation of the genetic correction by sequencing. Figure S4. Expression of surface markers and gp91phox during differentiation. Figure S5. ROS activity in CFUs and differentiated granulocytes assayed by NBT staining. Table S1. CYBB-BAC genomic integration sites. Table S2. List of recombineering oligos and primers. Materials and Methods
Table 1

Gene targeting efficiency

  56 in total

1.  A novel mutation in the CYBB gene resulting in an unexpected pattern of exon skipping and chronic granulomatous disease.

Authors:  D Noack; P G Heyworth; J T Curnutte; J Rae; A R Cross
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1999-08-30

2.  Copy number variation and selection during reprogramming to pluripotency.

Authors:  Samer M Hussein; Nizar N Batada; Sanna Vuoristo; Reagan W Ching; Reija Autio; Elisa Närvä; Siemon Ng; Michel Sourour; Riikka Hämäläinen; Cia Olsson; Karolina Lundin; Milla Mikkola; Ras Trokovic; Michael Peitz; Oliver Brüstle; David P Bazett-Jones; Kari Alitalo; Riitta Lahesmaa; Andras Nagy; Timo Otonkoski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Recombineering, transfection, Western, IP and ChIP methods for protein tagging via gene targeting or BAC transgenesis.

Authors:  Helmut Hofemeister; Giovanni Ciotta; Jun Fu; Philipp Martin Seibert; Alexander Schulz; Marcello Maresca; Mihail Sarov; Konstantinos Anastassiadis; A Francis Stewart
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 3.608

4.  A protocol describing the use of a recombinant protein-based, animal product-free medium (APEL) for human embryonic stem cell differentiation as spin embryoid bodies.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Ng; Richard Davis; Edouard G Stanley; Andrew G Elefanty
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  In vivo generation of transplantable human hematopoietic cells from induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Giovanni Amabile; Robert S Welner; Cesar Nombela-Arrieta; Anna Morena D'Alise; Annalisa Di Ruscio; Alexander K Ebralidze; Yevgenya Kraytsberg; Min Ye; Olivier Kocher; Donna S Neuberg; Konstantin Khrapko; Leslie E Silberstein; Daniel G Tenen
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Treatment of sickle cell anemia mouse model with iPS cells generated from autologous skin.

Authors:  Jacob Hanna; Marius Wernig; Styliani Markoulaki; Chiao-Wang Sun; Alexander Meissner; John P Cassady; Caroline Beard; Tobias Brambrink; Li-Chen Wu; Tim M Townes; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Notch signaling enhances osteogenic differentiation while inhibiting adipogenesis in primary human bone marrow stromal cells.

Authors:  Fernando Ugarte; Martin Ryser; Sebastian Thieme; Fernando A Fierro; Katrin Navratiel; Martin Bornhäuser; Sebastian Brenner
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Genetic correction and analysis of induced pluripotent stem cells from a patient with gyrate atrophy.

Authors:  Sara E Howden; Athurva Gore; Zhe Li; Ho-Lim Fung; Benjamin S Nisler; Jeff Nie; Goukai Chen; Brian E McIntosh; Daniel R Gulbranson; Nicole R Diol; Seth M Taapken; David T Vereide; Karen Dyer Montgomery; Kun Zhang; David M Gamm; James A Thomson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Genetic engineering of human pluripotent cells using TALE nucleases.

Authors:  Dirk Hockemeyer; Haoyi Wang; Samira Kiani; Christine S Lai; Qing Gao; John P Cassady; Gregory J Cost; Lei Zhang; Yolanda Santiago; Jeffrey C Miller; Bryan Zeitler; Jennifer M Cherone; Xiangdong Meng; Sarah J Hinkley; Edward J Rebar; Philip D Gregory; Fyodor D Urnov; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Stepwise development of hematopoietic stem cells from embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Kenji Matsumoto; Takayuki Isagawa; Toshinobu Nishimura; Takunori Ogaeri; Koji Eto; Satsuki Miyazaki; Jun-ichi Miyazaki; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Hiromitsu Nakauchi; Hideo Ema
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Targeted Repair of CYBB in X-CGD iPSCs Requires Retention of Intronic Sequences for Expression and Functional Correction.

Authors:  Colin L Sweeney; Jizhong Zou; Uimook Choi; Randall K Merling; Alexander Liu; Aaron Bodansky; Sandra Burkett; Jung-Woong Kim; Suk See De Ravin; Harry L Malech
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 11.454

2.  A New Chapter on Targeted Gene Insertion for X-CGD: Do Not Skip the Intro(n).

Authors:  Giorgia Santilli; Adrian J Thrasher
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 3.  Chronic Granulomatous Disease.

Authors:  Amit Rawat; Sagar Bhattad; Surjit Singh
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 1.967

4.  Therapeutic effects of proteoliposomes on X-linked chronic granulomatous disease: proof of concept using macrophages differentiated from patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Julie Brault; Guillaume Vaganay; Aline Le Roy; Jean-Luc Lenormand; Sandra Cortes; Marie José Stasia
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-03-20

5.  Efficient Generation and Correction of Mutations in Human iPS Cells Utilizing mRNAs of CRISPR Base Editors and Prime Editors.

Authors:  Duran Sürün; Aksana Schneider; Jovan Mircetic; Katrin Neumann; Felix Lansing; Maciej Paszkowski-Rogacz; Vanessa Hänchen; Min Ae Lee-Kirsch; Frank Buchholz
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 6.  Stem Cell-Based Disease Models for Inborn Errors of Immunity.

Authors:  Aline Zbinden; Kirsten Canté-Barrett; Karin Pike-Overzet; Frank J T Staal
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 7.  Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells as a Tool for Modeling Hematologic Disorders and as a Potential Source for Cell-Based Therapies.

Authors:  Ponthip Pratumkaew; Surapol Issaragrisil; Sudjit Luanpitpong
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 8.  Hematopoietic Cells from Pluripotent Stem Cells: Hope and Promise for the Treatment of Inherited Blood Disorders.

Authors:  Ilaria Rao; Laura Crisafulli; Marianna Paulis; Francesca Ficara
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 6.600

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.