Literature DB >> 26310842

Construct and predictive validity of the German Örebro questionnaire short form for psychosocial risk factor screening of patients with low back pain.

Carsten Oliver Schmidt1, T Kohlmann2, M Pfingsten3, G Lindena4, U Marnitz5,6, K Pfeifer7, J F Chenot8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recognizing patients at risk of developing chronic low back pain is essential for targeted interventions. One of the best researched screening instruments for this purpose is the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire (ÖMSPQ). This work addresses psychometric properties of the German ÖMSPQ short form and its construct and prognostic validity.
METHODS: Analyses are based on a cluster-randomized trial assessing a risk tailored intervention for patients consulting for low back pain in 35 general practices. A total of 360 patients consulting for acute and sub-acute back pain, aged 20-60 years, were included. All patients received a 10-item German short version of the ÖMSPQ, and other generic instruments (Graded Chronic Pain Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-Depression, Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire). The construct validity was assessed based on the factorial structure of the items and correlations with generic instruments. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity were calculated as measures of prognostic validity.
RESULTS: ÖMSPQ items belonging to the same subscale correlated highest among each other. The internal consistency of the ÖMSPQ items was 0.80 (Cronbach's α). The factorial structure corresponds with theoretic expectations. ÖMSPQ subscales on pain related disability, depression, and fear-avoidance beliefs correlated highest with their counterpart generic scales. The AUC for three ÖMSPQ-based prediction models ranged from 0.77 to 0.81.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results support a satisfactory factorial and prognostic validity of the German short ÖMSPQ. The instrument may guide the provision of targeted interventions. Further research should link it to targeted treatments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Back pain; Construct validity; General practice; Screening; Yellow flags; Örebro musculoskeletal pain questionnaire

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26310842     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4196-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  27 in total

1.  [Fear avoidance beliefs in patients with back pain. Psychometric properties of the German version of the FABQ].

Authors:  M Pfingsten
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  The concurrent validity of brief screening questions for anxiety, depression, social isolation, catastrophization, and fear of movement in people with low back pain.

Authors:  Peter Kent; Saeida Mirkhil; Jenny Keating; Rachelle Buchbinder; Claus Manniche; Hanne Birgit Albert
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.442

3.  HKF-R 10 - screening for predicting chronicity in acute low back pain (LBP): a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Eva Neubauer; Astrid Junge; Peter Pirron; Hanne Seemann; Marcus Schiltenwolf
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 3.931

4.  Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain.

Authors:  S J Linton; K Halldén
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 5.  An updated overview of clinical guidelines for chronic low back pain management in primary care.

Authors:  Paolo Pillastrini; Ivan Gardenghi; Francesca Bonetti; Francesco Capra; Andrew Guccione; Raffaele Mugnai; Francesco S Violante
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  Letters. TO THE EDITOR: Linton SJ, Nicholas M, MacDonald S. Development of a short form of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:1891-5.

Authors:  Charles P Gabel; Jason Osborne; Brendan Burkett; Markus Melloh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Predictive value of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire and the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire for persisting problems.

Authors:  Martin Sattelmayer; Tobias Lorenz; Christoph Röder; Roger Hilfiker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire.

Authors:  Steven J Linton; Katja Boersma
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.442

9.  Risk factors of chronicity in lumbar disc patients. A prospective investigation of biologic, psychologic, and social predictors of therapy outcome.

Authors:  M Hasenbring; G Marienfeld; D Kuhlendahl; D Soyka
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Effects of two guideline implementation strategies on patient outcomes in primary care: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Annette Becker; Corinna Leonhardt; Michael M Kochen; Stefan Keller; Karl Wegscheider; Erika Baum; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff; Michael Pfingsten; Jan Hildebrandt; Heinz-Dieter Basler; Jean F Chenot
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  9 in total

1.  Validity and responsiveness of the French version of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  R Hilfiker; I A Knutti; B Raval-Roland; G Rivier; G Crombez; Emmanuelle Opsommer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Swiss chiropractic practice-based research network and musculoskeletal pain cohort pilot study: protocol of a nationwide resource to advance musculoskeletal health services research.

Authors:  Rahim Lalji; Léonie Hofstetter; Alice Kongsted; Viktor von Wyl; Milo A Puhan; Cesar A Hincapié
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 3.  [Psychosocial risk factors for chronic back pain in the general population and in competitive sports : From theory to clinical screening-a review from the MiSpEx network].

Authors:  M I Hasenbring; C Levenig; D Hallner; A-K Puschmann; A Weiffen; J Kleinert; J Belz; M Schiltenwolf; A-C Pfeifer; J Heidari; M Kellmann; P-M Wippert
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 4.  Can screening instruments accurately determine poor outcome risk in adults with recent onset low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma L Karran; James H McAuley; Adrian C Traeger; Susan L Hillier; Luzia Grabherr; Leslie N Russek; G Lorimer Moseley
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  The Persian Version of Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire: Translation and Evaluation of its Psychometric Properties.

Authors:  S Elham Sharafi; Sina Hafizi; Mohammad Hosein Pourgharib Shahi; Ramin Kordi; Ahmad Ali Noorbala; Mohammad Arbabi; Ali-Akbar Nejatisafa
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2017-03-07

6.  Validation of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain.

Authors:  Anke Langenfeld; Carolien Bastiaenen; Florian Brunner; Jaap Swanenburg
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-03-02

7.  Development of a short form of the Hong Kong Chinese orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire.

Authors:  Raymond C C Tsang; Edwin W C Lee; Jamie S Y Lau; Susane S F Kwong; Eric M L So; Thomas F Y Wong; Rainbow K Y Law
Journal:  Hong Kong Physiother J       Date:  2018-09-13

8.  Can the French version of the short Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire or its subsets predict the evolution of patients with acute, (sub) acute and chronic pain?

Authors:  Natalya Korogod; Arnaud Steyaert; Emmanuelle Opsommer; Anne Berquin; Olivier Nonclercq
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Validation of the German version of the STarT-MSK-Tool: A cohort study with patients from physiotherapy clinics.

Authors:  Sven Karstens; Jochen Zebisch; Johannes Wey; Roger Hilfiker; Jonathan C Hill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.