Literature DB >> 16536645

Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis.

Agnes Moors1, Jan De Houwer.   

Abstract

Several theoretical views of automaticity are discussed. Most of these suggest that automaticity should be diagnosed by looking at the presence of features such as unintentional, uncontrolled/uncontrollable, goal independent, autonomous, purely stimulus driven, unconscious, efficient, and fast. Contemporary views further suggest that these features should be investigated separately. The authors examine whether features of automaticity can be disentangled on a conceptual level, because only then is the separate investigation of them worth the effort. They conclude that the conceptual analysis of features is to a large extent feasible. Not all researchers agree with this position, however. The authors show that assumptions of overlap among features are determined by the other researchers' views of automaticity and by the models they endorse for information processing in general.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16536645     DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  156 in total

1.  Does intrinsic motivation strengthen physical activity habit? Modeling relationships between self-determination, past behaviour, and habit strength.

Authors:  Benjamin Gardner; Phillippa Lally
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-07-04

2.  Spontaneous prospective-memory processing: Unexpected fluency experiences trigger erroneous intention executions.

Authors:  Jan Rummel; Thorsten Meiser
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

3.  On the automaticity of relational stimulus processing.

Authors:  Niclas Heider; Adriaan Spruyt; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-02

4.  Offline and online automatic number comparison.

Authors:  Filip Van Opstal; Agnes Moors; Wim Fias; Tom Verguts
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2007-02-20

5.  Implicit attitudes to smoking are associated with craving and dependence.

Authors:  Andrew J Waters; Brian L Carter; Jason D Robinson; David W Wetter; Cho Y Lam; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Attitudes as Object-Evaluation Associations of Varying Strength.

Authors:  Russell H Fazio
Journal:  Soc Cogn       Date:  2007-10-01

7.  Trust and valence processing in the amygdala.

Authors:  Patrik Vuilleumier; David Sander
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Attention and amygdala activity: an fMRI study with spider pictures in spider phobia.

Authors:  Georg W Alpers; Antje B M Gerdes; Bernadette Lagarie; Katharina Tabbert; Dieter Vaitl; Rudolf Stark
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models.

Authors:  Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 10.  Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review.

Authors:  Josh M Cisler; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.