Literature DB >> 26304612

Pathologic Assessment of Pancreatic Fibrosis for Objective Prediction of Pancreatic Fistula and Management of Prophylactic Drain Removal After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Hidenori Kiyochi1, Shouichi Matsukage2, Taro Nakamura3, Naoki Ishida3, Yasutsugu Takada4, Shinsuke Kajiwara3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Soft pancreatic texture is a commonly accepted risk factor associated with pancreatic fistula (PF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). However, its evaluation is subjective and its predictive value is limited. The present study was performed to establish intraoperative PF prediction parameter: the pathological assessment of pancreatic fibrosis, which was an objective evaluation that was strongly related to pancreatic consistency.
METHODS: Based on the results of a retrospective investigation on grades of pancreatic fibrosis and PF occurrence in 51 consecutive patients, an algorithm for intraoperative selection of early prophylactic drain removal was established. Prophylactic drains of patients with pancreatic fibrosis ≥ 30 % in the frozen section of pancreatic stump were removed on postoperative day (POD) 4. As CRP ≥ 10 mg/dL on POD 4 was a strong risk factor for PF in patients with fibrosis <30 %, the drains of these patients were maintained.
RESULTS: The algorithm was applied to 26 consecutive patients. Prophylactic drains were removed in 14 patients and retained in 12 patients on POD 4. No PF was observed in patients with pancreatic fibrosis ≥ 30 % (n = 8). Among six patients with fibrosis <30 %, CRP <10 mg/dL, and without infection in the drain fluid, only two developed grade A PF. All nine patients with pancreatic fibrosis <30 % and CRP ≥ 10 mg/dL developed grade B PF. No grade C PF was observed in any group.
CONCLUSIONS: The pathological evaluation of pancreatic fibrosis could objectively predict PF occurrence. Intraoperative assessment of pancreatic fibrosis could be applied to tailor postoperative drain management after PD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26304612     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3211-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  27 in total

1.  History of pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy: development of a more reliable anastomosis technique.

Authors:  A Kakita; M Yoshida; T Takahashi
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2001

2.  Infection control for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Shin Kobayashi; Naoto Gotohda; Yuichiro Kato; Shinichiro Takahashi; Masaru Konishi; Taira Kinoshita
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2013-06

3.  Incidence of pancreatic anastomotic failure and delayed gastric emptying after pancreatoduodenectomy in 507 consecutive patients: use of a web-based calculator to improve homogeneity of definition.

Authors:  Yasushi Hashimoto; L William Traverso
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Early versus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections: results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Enrico Molinari; Giuseppe Malleo; Stefano Crippa; Giovanni Butturini; Roberto Salvia; Giorgio Talamini; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Multivariate logistic regression analysis for prediction of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula in the early phase after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Hisashi Kosaka; Nobukazu Kuroda; Kazuhiro Suzumura; Yasukane Asano; Toshihiro Okada; Jiro Fujimoto
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 7.027

6.  Histomorphological features of the pancreatic remnant as independent risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula: a matched-pairs analysis.

Authors:  Orlin Belyaev; Johanna Munding; Torsten Herzog; Dominique Suelberg; Andrea Tannapfel; Wolfgang E Schmidt; Christophe A Mueller; Waldemar Uhl
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.996

7.  Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula.

Authors:  John W Lin; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Taylor S Riall; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  An analysis of risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: clinical impact of bile juice infection on day 1.

Authors:  Takahiro Kajiwara; Yoshihiro Sakamoto; Noriaki Morofuji; Satoshi Nara; Minoru Esaki; Kazuaki Shimada; Tomoo Kosuge
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  The latent presentation of pancreatic fistulas.

Authors:  W B Pratt; M P Callery; C M Vollmer
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Fatty pancreas: a factor in postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Authors:  Abhishek Mathur; Henry A Pitt; Megan Marine; Romil Saxena; C Max Schmidt; Thomas J Howard; Attila Nakeeb; Nicholas J Zyromski; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  6 in total

1.  Pathologic Assessment of Pancreatic Fibrosis in Predicting Pancreatic Fistula and Management of Prophylactic Drain Removal After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Xiaofei Lu; Yuxin Chen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Pathologic Assessment of Pancreatic Fibrosis for Objective Prediction of Pancreatic Fistula and Management of Prophylactic Drain Removal After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Reply.

Authors:  Hidenori Kiyochi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Prediction of Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy Based on Cross-Sectional Images.

Authors:  Ye Rim Chang; Jae Seung Kang; Jin-Young Jang; Woo Hyun Jung; Mee Joo Kang; Kyung Bun Lee; Sun-Whe Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Development and validation of risk prediction nomogram for pancreatic fistula and risk-stratified strategy for drainage management after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Jie Yin; Qicong Zhu; Kai Zhang; Wentao Gao; Junli Wu; Zipeng Lu; Kuirong Jiang; Yi Miao
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-01

5.  Dynamic prediction for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula: a novel prediction model for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Runwen Liu; Yunqiang Cai; He Cai; Yajia Lan; Lingwei Meng; Yongbin Li; Bing Peng
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Prediction of clinically relevant Pancreatico-enteric Anastomotic Fistulas after Pancreatoduodenectomy using deep learning of Preoperative Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Wei Mu; Chang Liu; Feng Gao; Yafei Qi; Hong Lu; Zaiyi Liu; Xianyi Zhang; Xiaoli Cai; Ruo Yun Ji; Yang Hou; Jie Tian; Yu Shi
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 11.556

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.